Stiverne and Arreola arranged a verbal skirmish on the Press Conference
Printable View
Stiverne and Arreola arranged a verbal skirmish on the Press Conference
Fuck yea Arreola!! fuck that nigga up
Arreola 239 lbs
Stiverne 239 ½ lbs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjLsdwcacFo
The thing I like about Chris is he is not only a great personality for the division but he always dishes out the necessary respects for his opponents before the bout and keeps it about the sport.
Then guys like Stiverne try to throw it back in his face basically calling him a loser and shit. I bet Don King probably urged Stiverne to do that, he sure changed his tune since last conference. King probably wanted to boost PPV sales lol.
Fuck that nigga up! Fuck him up good! lol
Stiverene wins again. Can't see this fight really deviating from the script of the first fight.
Bermaine Stiverne is going to fucking decapitate that Burrito Bum Ass-Fucker. Haiti! Haiti! Haiti! Ayiti!
Li ale travay nan maten Il va au travail le matin.
Li dòmi aswè Il dort le soir.
Li li bib la Il lit la Bible.
Mwen fè manje Je fais à manger.
Nou toujou etidye
Every now and then Don King reminds us that he can still put up quality fights.... here we have it now, salivating at the precipice of a SECOND fight between two non-title holding heavyweights, in a division that lacks talent, where the combatants aren't even at the top of the contender list, but here we are talking about it and waiting on it as if its the defining fight of the division- the American HW ranks, at least. lololol....
It's a very strong era, there can be no doubt. Show me the lack of talent? When most of the opponents in this era could obliterate most of the opponents of most others, what does that tell ya?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
I can't think of a single boxer pre 1970 that would even be competitive with let alone beat either Arreola or Stiverne. In fact I know there is none. Weak era argument is like 5 years old now man, it is completely smashed now.
As for the 2 of them they definitely are top boxers.
Of all 8 of the top boys or so besides Klitschko and Haye, Arreola and Stiverne, along with Pulev are proven and have durable qualities. Fury, Jennings, Wilder, Perez, Chisora etc still have huge question marks.
Max Power fuck off with the bollocks about these fighters being better than the 70's boxers. These are second rate fighters fighting on ESPN.
Stop using the word niga, it does not suit you.
Well I'm looking forward to this fight. Arreola is a solid fighter and I think he's going to take this rematch.
Good to see he's taking his physical fitness seriously and showing up at a more reasonable weight.
He's not the most agile and athletic guy in there anyway, there's no need to make it worse by coming in 250-260.
So agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
I find it pathetic when fans slate off boxers for being mouthy before the fight..its a fight FFS!
Say whatever you need to say to get under an opponents skin!
Wilder fights the winner and then we can see what deontay is all about.
I don't think psychological warfare will really affect Arreola to a great extent, he is a different cut than that.
And @Master, they are top contenders fighting for a world HW title, they are not backyard fighters and this is not a backyard fight.
You keep believing that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
It's kinda sad I'm completely impatient waiting for a fight between men with tits. I hear about better physical fitness but I still see tits. It isn't hard to not have tits
A few young limp-d!<ks say Heavyweights today are far superior to anyone from the 1990s and earlier, but those contenders back then didn't have t!t$ !!!
I think you over extended my analysis just a little bit there..Quote:
Originally Posted by bradlee180
And just what is the issue with the fat levels of either fighter here? Besides aesthetic?
They are "Heavyweight boxers" not models! A lot of those cut guys you are talking about got completely smashed by chubby boxers didn't they!
All thats important is that they have performance and durability which they do!
Andy Ruiz eats cut, ripped guys for breakfast. Michael Grant was ripped to the tee....Quote:
Originally Posted by Max PowerI think you over extended my analysis just a little bit there..Quote:
Originally Posted by bradlee180
And just what is the issue with the fat levels of either fighter here? Besides aesthetic?
They are "Heavyweight boxers" not models! A lot of those cut guys you are talking about got completely smashed by chubby boxers didn't they!
All thats important is that they have performance and durability which they do!
It's like this.
You can only be as lean in HW boxing as you have the luxury of being tall.
And at HW you can compensate for your lack of height by being chubby!
Chubby boxers are often the more dangerous opponents because they still have the weight for power but have better stamina because less muscles burning oxygen which are really only useful for grappling in the clinch and bullying. Plus they can most times take a harder punch because of well oiled tissues and padding.
Obviousy this only applies to a HW boxer who is also an elite trained athlete. He has the conditioning and the neuromuscular adaptions. Not to a fighter who is fat because he is untrained, only too one that is trained very hard but eats his way chubby. There's a BIG difference.
finished badly Arreola