https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2AOiSLzuFhw
He's done that quicker than; fury, Charr, Chambers and Parker. He looked good too, very strong powerful fighter. He's awkward Nascimento so that was a solid win.
Printable View
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2AOiSLzuFhw
He's done that quicker than; fury, Charr, Chambers and Parker. He looked good too, very strong powerful fighter. He's awkward Nascimento so that was a solid win.
Thanks for ruining the fight by revealing the result in the title. :appl:
The fight was ages ago ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
Did every member of Saddo's know the result? Why give it away?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tam SeddonThe fight was ages ago ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
Did any saddo member even know he boxed this weekend? There wasn't one thread about it , so I don't see the harm in sharing a result of a fight where nobody really knew it was happening anyway and there's a video for it too. Can't complain with that surely ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ruthless roccoDid every member of Saddo's know the result? Why give it away?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tam SeddonThe fight was ages ago ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
I think what you meant to respond with was:
Yeah, I guess it's kind of a dumbass thing to do. I'll stop and consider my fellow members in the future and not reveal the outcomes of fights in the titles of threads. Thanks for pointing that out Rocco. You're a swell guy.
I'd never reveal a fight on the day but if I didn't post this thread would anybody have know Whyte boxed this weekend? I doubt itQuote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
Post away. Just have the courtesy to not reveal the outcome in the title of the thread.
Well I don't do it for a clearly obvious big fight where a lot of people might be interested or haven't seen. But I think days after a fight where nobody has once talked about it, might have slipped under peoples radars. So I posted the thread so people could watch it. Instead your moaning as if I have ruined the biggest fight of the year or something. Makes no sense and I'm sure people would agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
I'm sure people would agree that you could post a title like
"Whyte vs Nascimento - Great Fight Yesterday!" (with Video)
You're acting like a baby because you did something inconsiderate and someone is calling you on it.
Learn from it and move on.
In your opinion. And I do posts threads like that for a significant fight , I understand that. But I bet if I didn't post this nobody would have even known he had boxed. And it's against Nasimento anyway would you have expected anything else but a whyte win?Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
But you should never reveal the results of the fights in the title. It's courtesy. I'm asking you. There's no point to revealing the outcome of fights. Just say there was a good fight. People will watch it.
Why are you having trouble understanding?
I do understand but it's not a fight of any significance , so I doubt anybody actually gives a shit about from you that I've posted the result.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
But it's about respecting peoples desire to not know the outcome of a fight.
Who are you to decide what fight I want to know the outcome of?
Why do you think you should be able to choose for me which fights I know the result of or not?
Listen it was A fight not fights, it wasn't significant and nobody has discussed it. If this has ruined your day I apologise. But Whyte - Nascimento is hardly Mayweather - Pacquiao, so I'm sure you won't cry yourself to sleep over being told a result from a small venue in London which had an inevitable outcome anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
So in the future you won't post the outcomes of fights in the title of the thread?
No matter how insignificant YOU think the fight is...
It depends on how significant the fight is and how long after the fight taking place.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
So you aren't going to respect the Saddo members desire to not know the outcomes of fights?
The Whyte Nascimento fight was fought 2 days ago. That's not very far in the past.
A fight where nobody had talked about, get over the fact I've posted the result it's hardly important. I understand spoiling but this isn't spoiling anything. I'm not going to reply anymore as we are going round in pointless circles and I've got better things to do with my time than have a stupid argument with you that's not going anywhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
Why don't you just agree to leave the one little detail out of the title then you fucking donkey!
Go under your rock and cry about itQuote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
What a loser.
Couldn't care less what you think about meQuote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
It's not what I think about you.
It's the way you're being with regard to the other members of the forum. You're being a selfish loser who won't just agree to respect what everyone already knows and an unwritten rule that everyone follows.
Don't give away the results of fights in the title of the thread.
Every few months a new member joins and posts the results and they are kindly asked to not do it and they always hear the reason and agree not to. Out of respect for the way the forum runs. You've been a member for 9 years and can't seem to understand that you're being a jerk.
So it's not what I think of you. It's how you're being @Tam Seddon .
A LOSER.
I'm aware of that and where have you ever seen me do it before? I've done it once for a fight that nobody had talked about and your making a massive big deal out of it Like I have ruined some super fight. That's my point it has no significance at all this fight, not one thread was made about it. Nobody clearly gave a fuck about it and why would they? It's a fight that had an extremely obvious outcome and you are crying like a little bitch saying I have spoiled a fight because an undefeated challenger took on a bum journey man. If it was a true 50/50 fight I'd understand , I would never do that. But as I have said about a million times it's not a significant fight and it only had one outcome. So stop crying over nothing and get over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
Still being a loser... I guess you just gotta be who you are.
Your just being pathetic, like your really bothered that I spoiled the result of this fight. I've never had an arguement with anybody on this forum , you must enjoy themQuote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
So let's review.
You posted the results of a fight which is something that is not welcome on the forum.
You think it's your prerogative to decide which fights are spoiled for the other members.
You won't agree to follow the unwritten rules if the forum.
And you tell me I'm trying to fight with you.
I'm going to fall asleep if this carries on worlds most pointless back and forth , that has gone nowhere and will go no where.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
I'm glad we had this time to talk.
Your level of respect for the forum and it's members is pathetic.
I'd really appreciate it if you wouldn't do that again. Thanks.
The words "destroys" and "in 2" are the main reason a lot of people clicked and opened the thread. If you typed Dillian Whyte professionally competes against Nascimento in a 12 round contest that may or may not go the distance". There's no way im clicking that to sit through 12 rounds of a majority draw at work or home unless the fighters are super relevant and have a fight coming up on the weekend so I can do some scouting. Just my personal preference....Credit, Tam.
Toothless Taco needs to step up his troll game or commit suicide imo. Used to think he was kinda funny now and then, but maybe it wasn't intentional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Undisputed
Here are a few suggestions for possible thread titles that may be more appropriate:
"Check Out This Amazing Fight From Last Night!"
"Whyte vs Nascimento - Amazing KO!"
"Nascimento vs Whyte - 2nd Round Annaihilation!!!"
These all convey the excitement of the fight without spoiling. Don't you think?
Still on repeat mode?Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless roccoQuote:
Originally Posted by J_Undisputed
Here are a few suggestions for possible thread titles that may be more appropriate:
"Check Out This Amazing Fight From Last Night!"
"Whyte vs Nascimento - Amazing KO!"
"Nascimento vs Whyte - 2nd Round Annaihilation!!!"
These all convey the excitement of the fight without spoiling. Don't you think?
I found the fight you and Rocco had more entertaining :)
Why was Whyte looking gassed part way through round 1?
I'll say this for it, that had some overhand right cricket deliveries that Chris Eubank would have been ashamed of.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rcuc8Zy_guk
Whyte's views of the fight
Whyte looks in bad shape to me and very limited, he's got power but i think AJ would murder him if they fought.
((If you don't want to know a boxing result don't go on a boxing forum))
Pretty good result for Whyte on paper - considering he beat him quicker than some bigger names have - but he certainly doesn't look in good shape and I burst out laughing at the bowler right hand that got him in some barney
Umm, how are the latter 2 not giving away anything? KO still tells us the official result and the word "2nd round annihilation" still implies the result as destroys in 2..Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless roccoQuote:
Originally Posted by J_Undisputed
Here are a few suggestions for possible thread titles that may be more appropriate:
"Check Out This Amazing Fight From Last Night!"
"Whyte vs Nascimento - Amazing KO!"
"Nascimento vs Whyte - 2nd Round Annaihilation!!!"
These all convey the excitement of the fight without spoiling. Don't you think?
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by J_UndisputedUmm, how are the latter 2 not giving away anything? KO still tells us the official result and the word "2nd round annihilation" still implies the result as destroys in 2..Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
I've learned that boxing fans aren't the brightest people in the world, and I shouldn't have high expectations of intelligence or ability to apply logic or to have much in the way of empathy, sympathy or even a base level of morality...but are you really that stunted?