Floyd Mayweather 48-0

Sorry guys.

I know it can be annoying.

But I want to revive this thread after the fight.

I'm so confident in Floyd's abilities whether its now or 6 years ago it will always be the same result against a nice person but flawed fighter in manny pac.

May the best man win but let's save this thread for the pro mayweather fans and the "told you so" smug mode that is due in May.

Let's keep this thread about the various ways that floyd will breakdown manny and how you feel he will intend to do it.

It's not going to be hard...just follow the marquez blueprint or any of the other 4 losses. (Dont be angry about this, just accept it)

Floyd is older than manny and should have faded as well but will be soooooo sharp in this fight.

I look forward to a fantastic 10 week build up excuses and déjà vu arguements...

Apparently the MGM sold out in 15 minutes. Have not seen the fine print but it appears to be a trilogy. I think Floyd might get stopped in the first go and be reborn and win two straight.

The fight may not really mean that much historically based on its timing but Floyd winning 3 straight over Manny and finishing with 50 and 0 would be something else.

Pacquioa has shown that he hasn't got much without PEDs. Floyd by SD but should be UD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ruthless rocco

Pacquioa has shown that he hasn't got much without PEDs. Floyd by SD but should be UD.

---

In mannys defence, it was never proven that he took peds but it does seem strange why he hasn't left top rank and also why his performance has dropped after ariza departure.

Either way, he would never have beaten floyd and this will close the arguement forever.

And yet Floyd looked half spent twice against Maidana with the same man on his payroll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ruthless rocco

Pacquioa has shown that he hasn't got much without PEDs. Floyd by SD but should be UD.

---

In mannys defence, it was never proven that he took peds but it does seem strange why he hasn't left top rank and also why his performance has dropped after ariza departure.

Either way, he would never have beaten floyd and this will close the arguement forever.

---

I'm not naive, I know it won't Stop but the allegations of Pac using peds without proof is unjust. Guys who used have been caught, Manny passed every test ever taken. The rumours will continue but with no proof, doesn't seem right to me. I'll say no more about this here as I know it is a Floyd thread. May the best man win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IamInuit

And yet Floyd looked half spent twice against Maidana with the same man on his payroll.

---

Thats true but manny is not an mma fighter and doesn't fight dirty.

The sad fact is that manny should have changed trainers along time ago like khan did as Freddie roach has no new tricks up his sleeve.

It's not Ariza that makes him seem guilty. It's the failure to accept a $100 million payday coupled with rediculous excuses like a fear a needles that all but indicts him. Not to mention an obvious drop in performance since he's voluntarily submitted himself to drug testing.

If Maidana and Cotto can take 5 rounds off of Mayweather, then Pac can take more and likely stop Floyd along the way. Mayweather is a great, but is fading and I can see Pac buzzing him all night long. I see Floyd getting beaten up and retired.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

If Maidana and Cotto can take 5 rounds off of Mayweather, then Pac can take more and likely stop Floyd along the way. Mayweather is a great, but is fading and I can see Pac buzzing him all night long. I see Floyd getting beaten up and retired.

---

You think Suede and Manic Street Preachers are still recording compelling music. Your judgement is sorely lacking!!!

This fight will change both fighters lives.

It will be worse for floyd but just another loss for manny.

Manny is a winner either way as he's fans will always come up with any excuse why he never won.

There was no excuse after the marquez loss though..funny that.

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

---

Ali had losses and he is still the goat in my opinion for different reasons.

Let's not excuse the fact that retaining that 0 doesnt matter!

Every fighter in history wants to keep their 0 but for whatever reason it doesn't always work out that way.

In this era floyd happens to be undefeated and is the best of THIS era.

Ray leonard has losses but was the best of HIS era..leonard would have loved to remained undefeated but Duran had his number that night.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

---

I love carl froch who HAS losses but is he better than JC without any losses.

JC undefeated record meant everything to him and he is arguably one of the best super middles of all time.

Where are you going with this?

There will be a rematch if it is mildly close, just to milk it even more.

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goti71

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

---

Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D

This fight just had to happen, but it's five years too late in my humble opinion.

Floyd and Pac have both slipped a bit, but I think Manny has dipped more than Mayweather. A fighter of constant pressure, high energy and with a furious attack will usually start to deteriorate quicker than a defensive counterpuncher.

It's an intriguing clash of styles, the irresistible force meeting the immovable object. Neither guy is in his prime anymore but they are the two outstanding boxers of their generation.

Early prediction ..... and I reserve the right to change my mind several times over the next few months!

Pac starts quickly and wins the first few rounds, surprising Mayweather with his speed and unusual punching angles. He might buzz Floyd s couple of times of even score a flash knockdown.

However, he is ageing and a naturally smaller man, so he can't sustain that pace. Floyd begins to work him out and start to time him with the straight right as he comes in. This makes Pac more cautious, which plays into Mayweathers hands.

Floyd begins to dominate the pace and distance of the fight, by the 9th there is only going to be one winner. Floyd gets a decision or even a late stoppage.

After the fight, Mannys fans say he had aged and Mayweather could never have defeated the 'real' Pacquiao.

I hope Manny gets drugged up with inspiration and just throws punches for ever second of every round and overwhelms the woman beater that is Floyd. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goti71

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

---

Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.

---

I thought he was invincible...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goti71

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

---

Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.

---

I thought he was invincible...

---

Floyd is but he is also a diva and I would not be surprised he has chosen the judges, referee and gloves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

---

I love carl froch who HAS losses but is he better than JC without any losses.

JC undefeated record meant everything to him and he is arguably one of the best super middles of all time.

Where are you going with this?

---

I am not going anywhere ? Even if Froch had never lost and Calzaghe had. I could still rate Calzaghe above him. Floyd seems obsessed by the idea, doesn't mean we have to be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goti71

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

---

I've read its a three fight deal so hopefully we get the skinny. The MGM being sold out in 15 minutes seems to be a lark. Hotels rooms that were 2 bills a night are now 7. Seats that were 250 to 500 are now 3,000 to 5,000. I dont understand the reluctance on this side of the world to hold something like this in an arena. At least that way every day working stiffs that actually follow the sport might be able to go.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D

---

Nacho has predicted against Floyd before. On multiple occasions. If you want to build a case it's best to point at how much worse Floyd's legs looked last fight than Mannys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D

---

Nacho has predicted against Floyd before. On multiple occasions. If you want to build a case it's best to point at how much worse Floyd's legs looked last fight than Mannys.

---

Yep.

Nacho knows best.

Close the thread.

Jeez.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IamInuit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goti71

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

---

I've read its a three fight deal so hopefully we get the skinny. The MGM being sold out in 15 minutes seems to be a lark. Hotels rooms that were 2 bills a night are now 7. Seats that were 250 to 500 are now 3,000 to 5,000. I dont understand the reluctance on this side of the world to hold something like this in an arena. At least that way every day working stiffs that actually follow the sport might be able to go.

---

I must have seen it on Bleacher Report or something. Don't know really, but I'm hoping they'll do at least one more for us fans then (if it's close).

It's amusing how eveyone's checking those hotel vacancies. I looked up the Venetian myself, just in case I win the lottery ;D but I obviously won't be going. And those prices for front seats! Crazy world innit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I hope Manny gets drugged up with inspiration and just throws punches for ever second of every round and overwhelms the woman beater that is Floyd. :)

---

If he gets drugged up its a 5million fine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ruthless rocco

It's not Ariza that makes him seem guilty. It's the failure to accept a $100 million payday coupled with rediculous excuses like a fear a needles that all but indicts him. Not to mention an obvious drop in performance since he's voluntarily submitted himself to drug testing.

---

so getting older doesnt count? i guess u are a republican conspiracy theorist cause you dont need facts to make your judgements

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D

---

Nacho has predicted against Floyd before. On multiple occasions. If you want to build a case it's best to point at how much worse Floyd's legs looked last fight than Mannys.

---

Yep.

Nacho knows best.

Close the thread.

Jeez.

---

yep imp knows best:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D

---

Nacho has predicted against Floyd before. On multiple occasions. If you want to build a case it's best to point at how much worse Floyd's legs looked last fight than Mannys.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D

---

Nacho has predicted against Floyd before. On multiple occasions. If you want to build a case it's best to point at how much worse Floyd's legs looked last fight than Mannys.

---

Yep.

Nacho knows best.

Close the thread.

Jeez.

---

Relax, buds, it's too early to get rattled. Just to calm your nerves, I'd say Floyd does have a chance and don't you forget that.;D

Floyd will be TKOed and I am very, very happy with the thought that he will retire after his fight with Manny . :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brucelee

Floyd will be TKOed and I am very, very happy with the thought that he will retire after his fight with Manny . :cool:

---

You tell 'em Bruce Lee. I hope you are right, but I fear there is a rematch in the small print.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

---

Ali had losses and he is still the goat in my opinion for different reasons.

Let's not excuse the fact that retaining that 0 doesnt matter!

Every fighter in history wants to keep their 0 but for whatever reason it doesn't always work out that way.

In this era floyd happens to be undefeated and is the best of THIS era.

Ray leonard has losses but was the best of HIS era..leonard would have loved to remained undefeated but Duran had his number that night.

---

Floyd doesn't care one tenny-wenny-tinny bit if we care about that "0", he does! Floyd does not give a rat's ass about eras!
Floyd wants that 50-0 record and that's all there is to it, end of story!
Floyd is not stupid, he knows he'll be an ATG and in the Hall of Fame without the 0. And he knows he will be so much more with that 0.
That's a record that will transcend boxing, it will be something extraordinary. People who despise boxing will know about Floyd and that 0! Do not say that 0 does not matter, because in my opinion, it's the only thing that does matter to Floyd.
Who knows when someone with Floyd's talent and hellacious cherry picking abilities will come along again?! Lol Just kidding, there will be plenty of guys come along with his talent. Lol Just fucking with you.
To tell the truth, I don't care much for Floyd, but I'd hate to see him come this close and get separated from that 0.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beenKOed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

---

Ali had losses and he is still the goat in my opinion for different reasons.

Let's not excuse the fact that retaining that 0 doesnt matter!

Every fighter in history wants to keep their 0 but for whatever reason it doesn't always work out that way.

In this era floyd happens to be undefeated and is the best of THIS era.

Ray leonard has losses but was the best of HIS era..leonard would have loved to remained undefeated but Duran had his number that night.

---

Floyd doesn't care one tenny-wenny-tinny bit if we care about that "0", he does! Floyd does not give a rat's ass about eras!
Floyd wants that 50-0 record and that's all there is to it, end of story!
Floyd is not stupid, he knows he'll be an ATG and in the Hall of Fame without the 0. And he knows he will be so much more with that 0.
That's a record that will transcend boxing, it will be something extraordinary. People who despise boxing will know about Floyd and that 0! Do not say that 0 does not matter, because in my opinion, it's the only thing that does matter to Floyd.
Who knows when someone with Floyd's talent and hellacious cherry picking abilities will come along again?! Lol Just kidding, there will be plenty of guys come along with his talent. Lol Just fucking with you.
To tell the truth, I don't care much for Floyd, but I'd hate to see him come this close and get separated from that 0.

---

Floyd cares about his 0 about as much as calzaghe cared about his..

The only threat to floyds 0 is himself.

If he gets old in the ring..its over.

If you was a fighter, you would want to be undefeated as much as anyone else..no one wants to loose.

Manny has had lots of experience in loosing but it still doesn't make him a bad fighter..manny has many flaws but lets hope he can put up a worthwhile performance that can keep his fans from saying he has past it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IamInuit

And yet Floyd looked half spent twice against Maidana with the same man on his payroll.

---

Thats true but manny is not an mma fighter and doesn't fight dirty.

The sad fact is that manny should have changed trainers along time ago like khan did as Freddie roach has no new tricks up his sleeve.

---

Floyd not an MMA fighter?? No he's a WWE superstar with his forearm smash. Floyd is a DIRTY FIGHTER!! After all don't forget he KO"d the BIG SHOW!! ROFLMAO. Told a big porkie saying he got paid $20 mil for it too Vince McMahon LHAO at that one

There'll be drama but Floyd's boxing and ring IQ is too much for Pac. Pac gets outclassed.

After manny takes his 6th loss, he needs to retire before he seriously hurts himself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

---

if floyd loses he wont be able to say - 49 have tried and like all 49 he will fail

or something along those lines

what a twat

just so i never hear that again i want him to lose

I feel butterflies and tingles inside.

1 week away and i need to book this fight on virgin media after the 27th!

Surely they should have had these showtime and Hbo Series on a bit sooner rather than leaving it to the last week!

Manny will be at his very best in this fight and I really believe he has a great chance to cause some drama in the early rounds.

Good luck to both of them but I expect nothing less than 48-0