"Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
I hate to see a wounded deer get eaten and mauled by a hungry lion, but........
tough fucking shit, that is the law of nature.
Now we all have to "bail out"/"empathize with"/"help" the fucking deer? We're all gonna die anyway, so FUCK THAT DEER AND LET THE LION HAVE A FUCKING MEAL!
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
now b4 any knee-jerk, PC correct, BLH, rabid reactionism happens, let me say I have helped out various people over the years at a soup kitchen in Paterson, NJ, as well as have made and handed out hundreds of sandwiches around the Bowery in NYC to the homeless for several years in a row around Christmas time.
However when these people become a burden on society in so, so many ways, I will not pay for them.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
now b4 any knee-jerk, PC correct, BLH, rabid reactionism happens, let me say I have helped out various people over the years at a soup kitchen in Paterson, NJ
Community service? hahaha
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
When gay marriage became legal
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
now b4 any knee-jerk, PC correct, BLH, rabid reactionism happens, let me say I have helped out various people over the years at a soup kitchen in Paterson, NJ
Community service? hahaha
MAO MAO MAO MAO TSE-TUNG BWAHA
no actually trying to save the world STARTING from my late 20's until about 35 and then said ::::
FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKK KKKKKKKK IT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Oh Brockton, the ghastly days you're longing for were just ever so brutal...what of empathy for the poor able bodied surfing musician? What of Old Dirty Bastard and all his baby mama? How on Earth will they survive?
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Only the strong survive, but only the good die young... :o
1 Attachment(s)
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Nothing wrong with helping those who need it. We are not Spartans, we don't cull the herds. A society can in part be judged on how it takes care of its sick and disabled. It is a difficult line, some will always want to take the easy way out. Let us not kill off those who need a hand. Let us take our fellow man by the hand, try to help him to understand we will all be together shaking our heads when we make it to the promised land, brothers.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Nothing wrong with helping those who need it. We are not Spartans, we don't cull the herds. A society can in part be judged on how it takes care of its sick and disabled. It is a difficult line, some will always want to take the easy way out. Let us not kill off those who need a hand. Let us take our fellow man by the hand, try to help him to understand we will all be together shaking our heads when we make it to the promised land, brothers.
ABSOLUTELY. I totally support helping people in need. We know who is in need, who cannot help it, and who are the lazy moochers. I totally support and HAVE supported those in real need, and I will continue to do so.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Nothing wrong with helping those who need it. We are not Spartans, we don't cull the herds. A society can in part be judged on how it takes care of its sick and disabled. It is a difficult line, some will always want to take the easy way out. Let us not kill off those who need a hand. Let us take our fellow man by the hand, try to help him to understand we will all be together shaking our heads when we make it to the promised land, brothers.
ABSOLUTELY. I totally support helping people in need. We know who is in need, who cannot help it, and who are the lazy moochers. I totally support and HAVE supported those in real need, and I will continue to do so.
I once gave up my seat on a bus to an obese person
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Nothing wrong with helping those who need it. We are not Spartans, we don't cull the herds. A society can in part be judged on how it takes care of its sick and disabled. It is a difficult line, some will always want to take the easy way out. Let us not kill off those who need a hand. Let us take our fellow man by the hand, try to help him to understand we will all be together shaking our heads when we make it to the promised land, brothers.
ABSOLUTELY. I totally support helping people in need. We know who is in need, who cannot help it, and who are the lazy moochers. I totally support and HAVE supported those in real need, and I will continue to do so.
Then why post threads as though you were writing headlines for the Daily Mail ? We are in this country (Great Britain) being ruled by a bunch of old Etonians and this is the philosophy with which they are tearing apart Britain and the society that our fathers and grandfathers fought to defend. How do you measure strength ? I do not even have half the will power of the love of my life who is paralyzed down one side or a tenth of the strength of one of my friends who despite being so twisted with cerebral palsy that he can not use his arms or hands is so determined to live independently that he uses one foot to propel his wheelchair backwards through the city we both live in. Not an electric wheelchair, a manual one, and the government I live under announced the withdrawal of the independent living allowance he gets, just last week. He could end up in a home. This is a guy who has been a European councillor, has run for MP, acted in a TV drama and choreographed dance troops. We are in an ideological war where "Only the strong survive" has been used as the justification of retaining privilege of birth, inherited wealth and the trampling of people's right to make a meaningful contribution to society.
So excuse me if It seems personal but right now it is.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Nothing wrong with helping those who need it. We are not Spartans, we don't cull the herds. A society can in part be judged on how it takes care of its sick and disabled. It is a difficult line, some will always want to take the easy way out. Let us not kill off those who need a hand. Let us take our fellow man by the hand, try to help him to understand we will all be together shaking our heads when we make it to the promised land, brothers.
ABSOLUTELY. I totally support helping people in need. We know who is in need, who cannot help it, and who are the lazy moochers. I totally support and HAVE supported those in real need, and I will continue to do so.
I once gave up my seat on a bus to an obese person
I could swear Beanz once said that that word is OUT, now, its not cool. We have to say "cellulite-challenged" person. Dude has an adjective list and shit. check with him, not sure about "obese"
MAO MAO MAO MAO - DUCK-FUCKY
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
I am the Rosa Parks of obesity.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Beanz you are WAY too touchy about this shit. The day you learn not to look for hidden, sinister signs in what people are saying and most importantly not to take it so personally, you will be a happier person mate.
Now go get a massage or something, dammit.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Beanz you are WAY too touchy about this shit. The day you learn not to look for hidden, sinister signs in what people are saying and most importantly not to take it so personally, you will be a happier person mate.
Now go get a massage or something, dammit.
Not really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Beanz you are WAY too touchy about this shit. The day you learn not to look for hidden, sinister signs in what people are saying and most importantly not to take it so personally, you will be a happier person mate.
Now go get a massage or something, dammit.
Not really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.
I'm happy to see you are a happy person. It's good you have never posted negative, divisive shit.
{Rod Serling: "That signpost up ahead---you have entered the ......."} :-X
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Beanz you are WAY too touchy about this shit. The day you learn not to look for hidden, sinister signs in what people are saying and most importantly not to take it so personally, you will be a happier person mate.
Now go get a massage or something, dammit.
Not really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.
I'm happy to see you are a happy person. It's good you have never posted negative, divisive shit.
{Rod Serling: "That signpost up ahead---you have entered the ......."} :-X
I think my signature may not help things but I really do not see myself as the moral PC guardian that you make me out to be. I can't stand sychophancy. Maybe because I had to learn the lesson quite early I am not at all worried about standing out like a sore thumb or disagreeing with the general consensus. I don't have a problem with going against the tide or making an unpopular point. I haven't really fallen out with any British posters (other than Miles who is a very singular individual) because I think they can pick out the content without inferring the intention that many others don't. For somebody like you who makes his living by speaking different languages that may surprise you, but I really don't give a toss what you or other people think of me or whether they are politically correct or not. This is a forum at the end of the day and one in which everybody agreed 100% would be as dull as dishwater.
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Beanz you are WAY too touchy about this shit. The day you learn not to look for hidden, sinister signs in what people are saying and most importantly not to take it so personally, you will be a happier person mate.
Now go get a massage or something, dammit.
Not really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.
I'm happy to see you are a happy person. It's good you have never posted negative, divisive shit.
{Rod Serling: "That signpost up ahead---you have entered the ......."} :-X
I think my signature may not help things but I really do not see myself as the moral PC guardian that you make me out to be. I can't stand sychophancy. Maybe because I had to learn the lesson quite early I am not at all worried about standing out like a sore thumb or disagreeing with the general consensus. I don't have a problem with going against the tide or making an unpopular point. I haven't really fallen out with any British posters (other than Miles who is a very singular individual) because I think they can pick out the content without inferring the intention that many others don't. For somebody like you who makes his living by speaking different languages that may surprise you, but I really don't give a toss what you or other people think of me or whether they are politically correct or not. This is a forum at the end of the day and one in which everybody agreed 100% would be as dull as dishwater.
why should you or anyone give a shit about what people think of you or anyone? agreed. 100%
Re: "Only the Strong Survive" --- when did this become "wrong"?
It is wrong because life shouldn't be about strength. Those that are looting the system are the least among us and the least deserving and they are not 'strong'. They simply have a well serviced propaganda system and a useful bunch of idiots protecting them. That doesn't make them strong. They are cowardly, hateful people who start wars and cause suffering because they simply have no heart or connection with reality. Is Ian Duncan Smith strong? After all he has money, is doing very well and yet 'strong' is the last adjective you would cast his way. Is Prince Charles 'strong'? You know as well as anyone that the system is wrong and that the survival of the fittest ideology is a despicable one and when you reach inside yourself you know what is right and wrong. You cannot attack the poor without first coming to terms with the inherent failings of the system. Did the 'strong' systematically dismantle the economy and family values over a 30 year period and try to convince us that it was the fault of the weak? Too right they did. Brock, everyone knows there are lazy poor people, but being born with money doesn't make anyone strong. There are lazy rich people and they are being given far more than the weak poor people ever have. In fact the system exists entirely for them.