He's had his critics, but I've always found Watt to be a much better commentator than John Rawling, who is repetitive, monotone, boring and biased.
Printable View
He's had his critics, but I've always found Watt to be a much better commentator than John Rawling, who is repetitive, monotone, boring and biased.
No man should have to endure what he has went through, losing both of his children. He has many detractors but you could never question his love of boxing. He knew that entertainment was part of the job and what the business side entailed in order to be a successful prize fighter. He was not Reg Gutteridge or Harry Carpenter but he was the last of that generation of commentators here in the UK. He could fight a bit too and I could never begrudge an old fighter a chance to make a second career behind the mic, however off target he was. In fact I think I liked him even all the more for it. In a world of bland celebs it was nice to have the familiar voice there, connecting me to my youth. My cat died recently at 18, she wasn't overly affectionate and massacred her fair share of wild life as well as, swiping at your ankles for no good reason sometimes, but I miss her for it.
Will miss Jim's voice as well, the daft old bugger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Genius ;D
It is difficult not be repetitive and entertaining when you are a commentator.
I like John Rawling on Eurosport and box nation.
In his earlier days commentating I found him engaging and insightful on what was likely going on for each fighter technically and in their mind during dramatic moments.
I always recall how he quickly changed his view early in Tyson vs Holyfield I "I've changed my mind already...."
Holding up his hands to be punched by Azumah Nelson and then being on the following program with bandages.
Well done Jim Watt. Played Sir.
Jim Watt is a legend, i've always liked him on the mic, he's been there and got the t shirt which comes through when he talks.
Ritchie Woodhall would be my choice to fill his boots, never understood why he wasn't snapped up ages ago by Sky Sports.
Can't argue with him as a boxer!
Is a commentater I always found that he said a lot of what I was thinking, yet still managed to score a fight completely the opposite.
I love his commentating, I question his scorecards sometimes though.
He will be missed and hard to replace.
I almost always liked him actually. After what he's been through hopefully he has relative peace of mind for however long he's got left.
I couldnt stand him. Apart from his awful scorecards I found his lack of research into fighters just downright disrespectful.
I like Jim Watt been there a WBC Champ, so the guy can have a opinion that counts,! remember he can give you a insight how a fighter feels in that ring a nice guy.
Statistics go through the window when your hit on the chin.
He may have been a bit biased to home fighters so WHAT.
Have a good retirement Jim.
Jim Watt is/was the greatest boxing commentator that has ever lived
Americans haven't got a clue, they can turn a good fight into an average fight and an average one into a shit one
We are very lucky in Britain, and Jim was the best
Eric , you do sarcasm amazingly well! You nearly had me going for a minute. 😂😉Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Im serious
Jim has always been a commentator since I was a kid, so I always liked him. And listen to the difference between the more subtle style back in the day, with Reg Gutteridge, to the super hypey modern co-comms.
The trouble with his scoring in recent years was, instead of scoring what he thought he scored what he thought the judges were seeing.
Oh right, Ha! here goes then.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
As a bloke he's a sound bloke and did fantastically well to win a World Title.
No Father should ever have to go through what he has in his personal life and my heart goes out to him.
As a commentator, he was dated and changed his mind every round.
As a ringside scorer , he was nothing short of a comedian. Fucking useless.
one thing I will give him credit for, There was a parody twitter account in his name, (Dunno if it's been shut down now.) which was the funniest things I've ever seen in my life.
its all about entertainment and Jim provides that
who cares if he gets it wrong sometimes
Ok, so he's there as an "expert summariser", but it's ok for him to get it wrong? So in effect a shit expert summariser can be a good expert summariser because they're "entertaining "?
So why don't they have Peter Kay replace him? He might get a few things wrong, but he's entertaining as fuck!
First and foremost it's about the BOXING. Please let's not lose track of that.
Great idea Peter Kay would be funny as a commentator. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
so you want a commentator that is entertaining, scores fights properly every time, never changes his mind, doesn't make any mistakes, and hits the nail on the head every time he opens his mouth?
no. I would settle for someone giving a good insight, reading fights well, have a fair idea of who has won a round and was easy to listen to. Nobody's perfect, but let's be consistent .Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
so you want a commentator that is entertaining, scores fights properly every time, never changes his mind, doesn't make any mistakes, and hits the nail on the head every time he opens his mouth?
Paulie Malignaggi, Carl Froch , Andre Ward and even the little Welsh fellah on Box Nation are better than Watt.
I like Richie Woodhall as a bloke, but he's a bit of a lickass and biased.
But I don't want to sound like a hater, I truly wish Jim Watt a happy retirement , because nobody should have to bury 2 of their own kids.
Richie really he's a nice guy down to earth I remember being in his company and this ass hole talking trash, about fighting not boxing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnerano. I would settle for someone giving a good insight, reading fights well, have a fair idea of who has won a round and was easy to listen to. Nobody's perfect, but let's be consistent .Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
so you want a commentator that is entertaining, scores fights properly every time, never changes his mind, doesn't make any mistakes, and hits the nail on the head every time he opens his mouth?
Paulie Malignaggi, Carl Froch , Andre Ward and even the little Welsh fellah on Box Nation are better than Watt.
I like Richie Woodhall as a bloke, but he's a bit of a lickass and biased.
But I don't want to sound like a hater, I truly wish Jim Watt a happy retirement , because nobody should have to bury 2 of their own kids.
Richie was a gent the guy had to much to drink just talking shit.
I remember that about 10 years back it must have been.
One of the good guys in boxing and there is nothing wrong with that.