-
I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
I think Special K had the right skill to do it
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
You can not say that as Floyd has fought better fighters at the weight and Kell has done very little since he beat Porter.
Now if you said Hearns, Leonard and Robinson then yes but not Kell.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Special kinda stupid.
(I know you're not really so dumb, you're just a hater. Nobody is that dumb)
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Have to disagree. Floyd was too fast and too damn good to lose to Brook, who is a solid fighter, but not elite like Floyd was. Floyd was an ATG fighter, so it would take another ATG fighter to beat at his best. Brook is very good, but hasn't shown me ANYTHING to make me think he is or ever will be an ATG.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Floyd would have been too good.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
floyds a right nob
Actually made me lol.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
and let me just add mayweather is not the best boxer in the world
never was, not even close
not even in the top 100
he would lose to your average light HW
in other sports the best is the best, not the best considering your size
when Jonny Wilkinson was the best rugby player in the world he was the best rugby player in the world, not the best rugby player in comparison with all the other rugby players of his size
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
In other sports, if youre not big enough youre not good enough
or if your not fast enough youre not good enough
so if youre not good enough to get on the team you dont get on the team
so lets be frank, Mayweather wouldn't be good enough to get on the team for his state never mind a world team
you could take your average athletic big man off the street, who has never fought before, give him a bit of training and put him in a boxing ring with mayweather over 12 rounds and he'd have a chance
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
In other sports, if youre not big enough youre not good enough
or if your not fast enough youre not good enough
so if youre not good enough to get on the team you dont get on the team
so lets be frank, Mayweather wouldn't be good enough to get on the team for his state never mind a world team
you could take your average athletic big man off the street, who has never fought before, give him a bit of training and put him in a boxing ring with mayweather over 12 rounds and he'd have a chance
Fucking hell! I don't mean to pick on every post you're putting up today, but what the fuck does all of that above even mean?
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Eric talking sense for once in his life, well posted.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
In other sports, if youre not big enough youre not good enough
or if your not fast enough youre not good enough
so if youre not good enough to get on the team you dont get on the team
so lets be frank, Mayweather wouldn't be good enough to get on the team for his state never mind a world team
you could take your average athletic big man off the street, who has never fought before, give him a bit of training and put him in a boxing ring with mayweather over 12 rounds and he'd have a chance
Fucking hell! I don't mean to pick on every post you're putting up today, but what the fuck does all of that above even mean?
who would win in a boxing fight Mayweather or A Josh?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Eric talking sense for once in his life, well posted.
Ok Einstein, seeing as you understand it, explain to me. Is Floyd "not good enough"?
Also, you STILL Haven't given your rating for Floyd?
Come on @Master, don't be scared!😂😂
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Eric talking sense for once in his life, well posted.
Ok Einstein, seeing as you understand it, explain to me. Is Floyd "not good enough"?
Also, you STILL Haven't given your rating for Floyd?
Come on @
Master, don't be scared!😂😂
Floyd is not good enough to get on the team
and that's not a matter of opinion, its a fact
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Eric talking sense for once in his life, well posted.
Ok Einstein, seeing as you understand it, explain to me. Is Floyd "not good enough"?
Also, you STILL Haven't given your rating for Floyd?
Come on @
Master, don't be scared!😂😂
Floyd is not good enough to get on the team
and that's not a matter of opinion, its a fact
There you have it from the new PK.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Eric talking sense for once in his life, well posted.
Ok Einstein, seeing as you understand it, explain to me. Is Floyd "not good enough"?
Also, you STILL Haven't given your rating for Floyd?
Come on @
Master, don't be scared!😂😂
Floyd is not good enough to get on the team
and that's not a matter of opinion, its a fact
There you have it from the new PK.
i can honestly say im honoured that somebody with the level of respect that you have @Master, would mention mine and PKs name in the same ilk
this is a day ill remember for ever
-
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
The consensus opinion on Brook perhaps got a little inflated off the Golovkin fight. Brook came out like a buzzsaw and threw everything but the kitchen sink against a sandbagging Golovkin who never really intended to box brook.. and instead chose to seek and destroy without stepping back.
Brook could have moderate success against floyd early trying to those those fast combinations as mayweathers legs are mostly gone. Think maybe like a neater cleaner victor ortiz attack with the same energy but better faster punches. After a few rounds Mayweather works out brook and starts stifling his attack with jabs to the mid section to keep brook off balance. Brook starts to fade and Mayweather takes over en route to a unanimous decision.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
for example
if the best 15 year old footballer in the world is miles better than any other 15 year old footballer, miles more than the best open age footballer is better than any other open age footballers does that mean that that 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
for example
if the best 15 year old footballer in the world is miles better than any other 15 year old footballer, miles more than the best open age footballer is better than any other open age footballers does that mean that that 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
Makes perfect sense to me. :)
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
for example
if the best 15 year old footballer in the world is miles better than any other 15 year old footballer, miles more than the best open age footballer is better than any other open age footballers does that mean that that 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
Yes! Point?
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
it does mean the 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
it does mean the 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
well re-read your post, your grammar is shite mate. I don't see the point you're trying to make.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
it does mean the 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
well re-read your post, your grammar is shite mate. I don't see the point you're trying to make.
Your grammar is shiter
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
I still say Kell had the style to whip Mayweather's ass, hence why he never fought him.
Mayweather wanted none of Shaun Porter, Kell Brook, or Keith Thurman
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
it does mean the 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
well re-read your post, your grammar is shite mate. I don't see the point you're trying to make.
Your grammar is shiter
That's a bit better. If I'd have said "Shit" then the reply would've / should've been "Shittier" with an "i". However , I said "Shite" , so your response was correct. However, I do believe that was a lucky guess seeing as your Missus is spending all weekend on a Spar shopping fest! ;D;D
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Too many howevers in that sentence
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
for example
if the best 15 year old footballer in the world is miles better than any other 15 year old footballer, miles more than the best open age footballer is better than any other open age footballers does that mean that that 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
I've read this about 5 times and have no idea what the fuck it is saying
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
for example
if the best 15 year old footballer in the world is miles better than any other 15 year old footballer, miles more than the best open age footballer is better than any other open age footballers does that mean that that 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
I've read this about 5 times and have no idea what the fuck it is saying
Right, fuckin el
I'm not even gonna bother anymore, I spread my wisdom and if you lot aren't ready for it then that's not my problem
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Haters gonna hate I suppose.
for example
if the best 15 year old footballer in the world is miles better than any other 15 year old footballer, miles more than the best open age footballer is better than any other open age footballers does that mean that that 15 year old is the best footballer in the world?
I've read this about 5 times and have no idea what the fuck it is saying
Batman sticks up for Primo as usual do not take it personally eric, PK would understand it.
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Too many howevers in that sentence
There's only 2!
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW
Yeah, you only needed one
The second one made you sound like a fanny
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Yeah, you only needed one
The second one made you sound like a fanny
😂😂😂 still, at least I wouldn't be a ginger fanny. 😂😂
-
Re: I think Kell Brook would have taken Mayweather at WW