-
Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
The courts ruled Arabs, Syrians, and Armenians as not white in the following cases: In re Halladjian (1909), Ex parte Shahid (1913), Ex Parte Dow (1914), In re Dow (1914), and In re Ahmed Hassan Araxian (1942), Chamacharjjian (1957), Ex Parte Hateesh Chandanivaroopian (1960). The courts ruled Arabs, Syrians, Middle Easterners, or Armenians to be partly-white in the following cases: In re Najour (1909), In re Mudarri (1910), In re Ellis (1910), Dow v. United States (1915), United States v. Cartozian, and Ex Parte Mohriez (1944).[26][27].
Judge Lowell of the Boston Massachusetts Circuit Court was then bribed for 20000 US dollars by VAHAG EKMEKJJIAN to make a declaration for the state of Massachusetts that Armenians should henceforth be allowed to buy and sell property in the United States of America and would be classified from that moment forward as being "of or very nearly of the white race".
What a charade.
@walrus
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
therefore, and since Armenians are from Mesopotamia, I AM NOT WHITE
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Come on now, Brock. You are a little bit white and you don't listen to hip hop.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
You are admittedly Italian nothing wrong with that. Armenia is similar to aryan I’m sorry but you are white. You are free to think what you want though, you are an American, you have birth right citizenship and we are free to choose gender and race apparently absolutely nothing wrong with what u think
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Exactly, Brock can be what he wants to be. After reading Peterson I am convinced that I am part lobster. I won't be stereotyped as a human being. If you trace our history back far enough us and lobsters were quite the same.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Exactly, Brock can be what he wants to be. After reading Peterson I am convinced that I am part lobster. I won't be stereotyped as a human being. If you trace our history back far enough us and lobsters were quite the same.
Oh shit u r genius. I really like cats. We are very close genetically to cats. I am definitely part cat. I also greatly enjoyed my stay in china, it’s a very based country. I am definitely part Chinese. I am Chinese-cat-Irish-American. I must say it is good to be me.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Human and cats have about 90% of DNA in common. Here are some more facts and figures:
- Genome-wide variation from one human being to another can be up to 0.5% (99.5% similarity)
- Chimpanzees are ~ 98% similar to humans, depending on how it is calculated.
- Cats have ~90% of homologous genes with humans, 82% with dogs, 80% with cows, 79% with chimpanzees, 69% with rats and 67% with mice. Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome
- Cows (Bos taurus) are ~80% genetically similar to humans
- 75% of mouse genes have equivalents in humans, ~90% of the mouse genome could be lined up with a region on the human genome. About 99% of mouse genes turn out to have analogues in humans.
- The fruit fly (Drosophila) shares about 60% of its DNA with humans.
- About 60% of chicken genes correspond to a similar human gene.
@Gandalf the above list proves it is reasonable for me to pick any or all of these animals
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Exactly, Brock can be what he wants to be. After reading Peterson I am convinced that I am part lobster. I won't be stereotyped as a human being. If you trace our history back far enough us and lobsters were quite the same.
Oh shit u r genius. I really like cats. We are very close genetically to cats. I am definitely part cat. I also greatly enjoyed my stay in china, it’s a very based country. I am definitely part Chinese. I am Chinese-cat-Irish-American. I must say it is good to be me.
I have always considered you a pussy, so I guess it makes sense.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Jews, Irish and Italians were considered sort of not-really-white in those days.
Cats were the incarnation of the devil.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goti71
Jews, Irish and Italians were considered sort of not-really-white in those days.
Cats were the incarnation of the devil.
Exactly. Not only that but Armenians were referred to as dirty black Armenians and also Fresno Indians
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
therefore, and since Armenians are from Mesopotamia, I AM NOT WHITE
Let me explain something
If this is you
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ine=1525717482
You are white.
That means you are white in this society (and around the world) because to anyone with whom you'd interact, you will appear “white.”
So employers, loan officers, police, teachers, and average everyday ppl on the street would look at you, presume your whiteness, and treat you accordingly.
So that means the presumptions of competence, and law-abidingness, and credit-worthiness, and general intelligence would be given
These are things no black person can presume others will think about them
Whiteness is what ppl presume you to be. And that has nothing to do with genotype (since people cannot know your DNA just by looking at you) but everything to do with phenotype, which is the way certain genes are expressed outwardly, like skin pigmentation, and a handful of other characteristics, which are controlled by about six genes out of 30,000 in the overall human genome.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
You are confusing the color of someone's skin with someone's DNA and genetic ancestry. You are right that the apparent color of someone's skin can give them advantages around the world but you were arguing something different now which has nothing to do with genetics. The color of one's skin is only one genetic indicator but there are so many other chromosomes that indicate a person's genetic origin besides skin color
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
So if I am white then why do I have really terrible credit and I have a very poor career and I am very poor? I have never been able to get into a high-paying job despite my college education I have always been financially poor. My 2017 tax return shows $13,700 US Dollars income. In 2016 I earned $21,400 and it 2015 I only earned $9,700. No rental agency will rent me a one year lease for an apartment because I do not have any credit worthiness. My apparent whiteness has not helped me at all.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
I know plenty of black people that have much better credit than I have. I know plenty of black people in New Jersey and New York who own their own homes to the tune of half a million dollars and up. There are plenty of black entrepreneurs here in New York and New Jersey with their own businesses. Their Blackness did not stop them from doing those things. And my whiteness as you would like to call it has not helped me at all to be able to accomplish any of those things
@denilsonReturnsWithViolins
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
You are confusing the color of someone's skin with someone's DNA and genetic ancestry. You are right that the apparent color of someone's skin can give them advantages around the world but you were arguing something different now which has nothing to do with genetics. The color of one's skin is only one genetic indicator but there are so many other chromosomes that indicate a person's genetic origin besides skin color
Dude. You are a white man.
It's not even close. You could walk right into Aryan Nation gathering. Any alt-Right gathering and they'd welcome you with open arms. Stop talking B.S
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
You are confusing the color of someone's skin with someone's DNA and genetic ancestry. You are right that the apparent color of someone's skin can give them advantages around the world but you were arguing something different now which has nothing to do with genetics. The color of one's skin is only one genetic indicator but there are so many other chromosomes that indicate a person's genetic origin besides skin color
Dude. You are a white man.
It's not even close. You could walk right into Aryan Nation gathering. Any alt-Right gathering and they'd welcome you with open arms. Stop talking B.S
Brock he's got you.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbQSZRrJcdE
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I know plenty of black people that have much better credit than I have. I know plenty of black people in New Jersey and New York who own their own homes to the tune of half a million dollars and up. There are plenty of black entrepreneurs here in New York and New Jersey with their own businesses. Their Blackness did not stop them from doing those things. And my whiteness as you would like to call it has not helped me at all to be able to accomplish any of those things
@denilsonReturnsWithViolins
You could have said that fifty years ago.
Hell google Madam C J Walker. she was the first black millionaire in 1912 selling hair products. So there was no racism in 1912 because she had a fat pocket ? Talk sense.
The very few black ppl in N.Jersey who have million dollar homes (and I reckon it's very few) have been allowed to have those homes.
White supremacists don't give fk about how much money a black person has. They can take down any rich black person when they get ready. Go and ask Bill Cobsy
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I know plenty of black people that have much better credit than I have. I know plenty of black people in New Jersey and New York who own their own homes to the tune of half a million dollars and up. There are plenty of black entrepreneurs here in New York and New Jersey with their own businesses. Their Blackness did not stop them from doing those things. And my whiteness as you would like to call it has not helped me at all to be able to accomplish any of those things
@denilsonReturnsWithViolins
You could have said that fifty years ago.
Hell google Madam C J Walker. she was the first black millionaire in 1912 selling hair products. So there was no racism in 1912 because she had a fat pocket ? Talk sense.
The very few black ppl in N.Jersey who have million dollar homes (and I reckon it's very few) have been allowed to have those homes.
White supremacist don't give fk about how much money a black person has. They can take down any rich black man when they get ready. Go and ask Bill Cobsy
LOL...yeah go ask Bill Cosby how about you go ask OJ Simpson while you're at it...lulz
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
LOL...yeah go ask Bill Cosby how about you go ask OJ Simpson while you're at it...lulz
When they put all the white female Bill Cosby "rape" accusers on the cover of NY mag, this was just a white supremacists witch hunt. A couple of token black females means nothing.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBkh0lkV0AA7RU0.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcSIAefW4AAn_hg.jpg
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
None of those other guys look anything like Bill Cosby , no wonder he was easy to pick out of the ID parade.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
Bill Cosby was accused of rape in the court of law
Donald Trump has done what exactly that is against the law? Don't be a complete dumb ass and say "Stormy Daniels!!!!" (consensual) or "He said 'Grab 'em by the pussy!' " yeah he SAID that, SAID, which isn't against the law (unless he was in England)
Matt Lauer did not have criminal charges brought against him, should he have? Yeah probably, but that's on the victims to bring those charges.
O'Reilly paid out several CIVIL suits but never got charged criminally, should he have been? Yeah probably, but that's on the victims to bring those charges.
Charlie Sheen did what exactly? There's rumors that he raped Corey Haim on the set of 'Lucas' but that would have been Corey Haim's charge to bring forward. He had several dalliances with pornstars which isn't against the law, hell even if he knowingly gave HIV to somebody that is no longer against the law in California soooo yeah I need to know what exactly it is about Sheen that was illegal, perhaps I'll even agree with you.
Harvey Weinstein's day is coming, it remains to be seen if he'll be charged in LA or New York, but we'll see. He certainly paid out several civil settlements which had NDA's attached to them, but we'll see if criminal charges are pursued.
If this is what the Occupy Democrats group is running with then MY GOD it's going to be MAGA for a loooooooong time LOL. Who are they getting their talking points from? Tariq Nasheed? :rofmaoal:
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
None of those other guys look anything like Bill Cosby , no wonder he was easy to pick out of the ID parade.
They are white. So they won't appear in court. Other white people with support and back them out.
They are taken his honorary degrees and doctorates. They take don't shit back from Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, Roman Polanski.
Where's all the money that Cosby gave you white supremacists ? All the money he donated. Give that bk since he's so bad and rapey. They ain't given that back.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
None of those other guys look anything like Bill Cosby , no wonder he was easy to pick out of the ID parade.
They are white. So they won't appear in court. Other white people with support and back them out.
They are taken his honorary degrees and doctorates. They take don't shit back from Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, Roman Polanski.
Where's all the money that Cosby gave you white supremacists ? All the money he donated. Give that bk since he's so bad and rapey. They ain't given that back.
He must have kept records of his cash so he must be able to claim it all back ?
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
So if I am white then why do I have really terrible credit and I have a very poor career and I am very poor? I have never been able to get into a high-paying job despite my college education I have always been financially poor. My 2017 tax return shows $13,700 US Dollars income. In 2016 I earned $21,400 and it 2015 I only earned $9,700. No rental agency will rent me a one year lease for an apartment because I do not have any credit worthiness. My apparent whiteness has not helped me at all.
Because you are in the wrong country. Come to the UK and you could earn $41,000 a year.
https://www.reed.co.uk/average-salar...tion/esol-tefl
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Bill Cosby was accused of rape in the court of law
Donald Trump has done what exactly that is against the law? Don't be a complete dumb ass and say "Stormy Daniels!!!!" (consensual) or "He said 'Grab 'em by the pussy!' " yeah he SAID that, SAID, which isn't against the law (unless he was in England)
Matt Lauer did not have criminal charges brought against him, should he have? Yeah probably, but that's on the victims to bring those charges.
O'Reilly paid out several CIVIL suits but never got charged criminally, should he have been? Yeah probably, but that's on the victims to bring those charges.
Charlie Sheen did what exactly? There's rumors that he raped Corey Haim on the set of 'Lucas' but that would have been Corey Haim's charge to bring forward. He had several dalliances with pornstars which isn't against the law, hell even if he knowingly gave HIV to somebody that is no longer against the law in California soooo yeah I need to know what exactly it is about Sheen that was illegal, perhaps I'll even agree with you.
That's the whole point. They have a system to protect them. They have judges, lawyers, DA's all on board. That's how white supremacy works
The FBI and the Justice department themselves have just admitted that they have been given out false information for decades which lead the imprisonment of thousands of black men, but decades later they come out and say "Ooops sorry"
Cosby was set up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Harvey Weinstein's day is coming
https://media3.giphy.com/media/Mjl0BsAgMGYTe/200w.webp
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Bill Cosby was accused of rape in the court of law
Donald Trump has done what exactly that is against the law? Don't be a complete dumb ass and say "Stormy Daniels!!!!" (consensual) or "He said 'Grab 'em by the pussy!' " yeah he SAID that, SAID, which isn't against the law (unless he was in England)
Matt Lauer did not have criminal charges brought against him, should he have? Yeah probably, but that's on the victims to bring those charges.
O'Reilly paid out several CIVIL suits but never got charged criminally, should he have been? Yeah probably, but that's on the victims to bring those charges.
Charlie Sheen did what exactly? There's rumors that he raped Corey Haim on the set of 'Lucas' but that would have been Corey Haim's charge to bring forward. He had several dalliances with pornstars which isn't against the law, hell even if he knowingly gave HIV to somebody that is no longer against the law in California soooo yeah I need to know what exactly it is about Sheen that was illegal, perhaps I'll even agree with you.
That's the whole point. They have a system to protect them. They have judges, lawyers, DA's all on board. That's how white supremacy works
The FBI and the Justice department themselves have just admitted that they have been given out false information for decades which lead the imprisonment of thousands of black men, but decades later they come out and say "Ooops sorry"
Cosby was set up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Harvey Weinstein's day is coming
https://media3.giphy.com/media/Mjl0BsAgMGYTe/200w.webp
Well Bill Cosby's journey to the courtroom wasn't exactly what I would call "expeditious"
Donald Trump has done what exactly that is against the law?
You going to answer that or are you from the Beanz school of post reading?
Oooh look another question for you to ignore....perhaps you ignored it because the font is black you white supremacist :rolleyes:
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Donald Trump has done what exactly that is against the law?
Donald Trump is the Law
That's the whole point.
When former KKK imperial Wizard David Duke embraced a president, that says something about Trump.
It's significant that white supremacists (like you) are so excited about the president.
It is significant because Trump done something to win all that approval.
When white supremacists were like “whoa, this Trump guy is our dream come true and doing things we never thought we’d see from a president”
That signifies something about Donald Trump.
So no more whining white man. You have your white supremacist president in the big house.
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DenilsonTheReturn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Well Bill Cosby's journey to the courtroom wasn't exactly what I would call "expeditious"
Donald Trump has done what exactly that is against the law?
Donald Trump is the Law
That's the whole point.
When former KKK imperial Wizard David Duke embraced a president, that says something about Trump.
It's significant that white supremacists (like you) are so excited about the president.
It is significant because Trump done something to win all that approval.
When white supremacists were like “whoa, this Trump guy is our dream come true and doing things we never thought we’d see from a president”
That signifies something about Donald Trump.
So no more whining white man. You have your white supremacist president in the big house.
Thank you for reminding me just how retarded you are......I had forgotten :shakehead:
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=...118575.png&f=1
Whaaaaaaaaaat? David Duke supports KEITH ELLISON!!!!
Yo Keith, what do you think about that?
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/asse...-large-169.jpg
-
Re: Interesting United States Supreme Court decisions on race
Oh here we go with this Keith stuff now