-
Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Nobody could touch him. Nobody could even see him. Blinding speed. Piercing punches. Excitement and charisma to infinity. Great looks. Eloquent. Witty. Pretty.
Sickening how every man, woman no matter how great, how poor....is reduced to rubble, to dust, to scattered memories, which themselves then fade into nothingness.
What a plight mankind has.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Tyson under my supervision would flush him off the ring in 3 rounds
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
I think 1960 - 1963 was too early, as he was young & hadn't filled out yet.
I think by 1966, he had filled out & he was in his absolute prime.
Arguably, his 'prime' years were the 3 years he spent in exile, but that's only speculation on my part.
The Ali that beat Cleveland Williams & Zora Foley was the best Ali we ever saw & arguably the finest HW ever.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NVSemin
Tyson under my supervision would flush him off the ring in 3 rounds
I can see how only a very young and explosive and on his game Mike Tyson would have a chance.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Syntax Error
I think 1960 - 1963 was too early, as he was young & hadn't filled out yet.
I think by 1966, he had filled out & he was in his absolute prime.
Arguably, his 'prime' years were the 3 years he spent in exile, but that's only speculation on my part.
The Ali that beat Cleveland Williams & Zora Foley was the best Ali we ever saw & arguably the finest HW ever.
Too Fast. Too Fast just too fast that was his number one attribute. It was definitely not his defense on his punching power and he never punch to the body. And sometimes he seemed surprisingly easy to hit. But it was his speed it was his speed speed was the key that put him in another category compared to everybody else
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NVSemin
Tyson under my supervision would flush him off the ring in 3 rounds
I can see how only a very young and explosive and on his game Mike Tyson would have a chance.
I got caught up in the Tyson hype as much as anyone in the late 80s. But even in his pomp, in my mind, Tyson beat everyone but Ali...
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
I agree 80s Tyson is the only one with a chance but Ali had a cast iron jaw and I always remember something Colin Hart said during his commentary for the Douglas fight in 1990 - "Mr Ali would have played with him"(or something very similar)
That sums up how the fight would've gone for me. Tyson explosive for 2-3 rounds then out of ideas as he got toyed with.
Stoppage for Ali from around the 8th onwards - or a Tyson DQ
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
I cast @maxpower in this thread to teach you, children, max powerism 101!
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NVSemin
I cast @
maxpower in this thread to teach you, children, max powerism 101!
Do not let that idiot of Bill Paxtom ever come on this site again.
Tyson said Ali was just a "bad man" and would always find a way to win.
-
Tyson? Really? Embarrassing.
He would have absolutely no shot, none.
If you said a prime LL then there would be a discussion.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Tyson? Really? Embarrassing.
He would have absolutely no shot, none.
If you said a prime LL then there would be a discussion.
Only because of his size and therefore power in every other department he was inferior.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Tyson? Really? Embarrassing.
He would have absolutely no shot, none.
If you said a prime LL then there would be a discussion.
Only because of his size and therefore power in every other department he was inferior.
If you go through the hassle of inventing the time machine that throws Ali 30 years forward; then surely too you would assume Ali would be born 1970 rather than 1940, with the same advantages of a better diet that Lewis had; thus Ali surely would be a couple of inches taller and a couple of stone heavier...
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Syntax Error
I think 1960 - 1963 was too early, as he was young & hadn't filled out yet.
I think by 1966, he had filled out & he was in his absolute prime.
Arguably, his 'prime' years were the 3 years he spent in exile, but that's only speculation on my part.
The Ali that beat Cleveland Williams & Zora Foley was the best Ali we ever saw & arguably the finest HW ever.
If Doug Jones could goad a young inexperienced Clay into a fight....pretty much anyone could.
I've always stated 64-67 Ali=undefeatable. Should've been 64-70....
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SlimTrae
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Syntax Error
I think 1960 - 1963 was too early, as he was young & hadn't filled out yet.
I think by 1966, he had filled out & he was in his absolute prime.
Arguably, his 'prime' years were the 3 years he spent in exile, but that's only speculation on my part.
The Ali that beat Cleveland Williams & Zora Foley was the best Ali we ever saw & arguably the finest HW ever.
If Doug Jones could goad a young inexperienced Clay into a fight....pretty much anyone could.
I've always stated 64-67 Ali=undefeatable. Should've been 64-70....
The strange thing is that the exile of Ali created Frazier and the biggest fight ever. If that did not happen Joe may have got beaten by Ali as just another contender.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
1938 Joe Louis was the most complete fighting machine there has ever been at heavyweight.
I truly love Ali, in and out of the ring ......... but Louis was the real thing too.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
1938 Joe Louis was the most complete fighting machine there has ever been at heavyweight.
I truly love Ali, in and out of the ring ......... but Louis was the real thing too.
Ali was all wrong for Joe Louis, who was the 2nd best heavyweight of all time, because Joe had problems with skilled boxers who moved. Ali was also bigger and more durable to lost to Joe.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
its true Joe found slick boxers the most difficult style (he obliterated everyone else 😀)
I'd refer you to Britkids comment earlier, if Joe had been born 40 years later, he would have been a couple of inches taller and a few stone heavier with better diet and nutrition.. If he had been born in the 1980s he could have been bigger than Anthiny Joshua. He was bigger than the average guy than Joshua.
Both all time greats though, what a fight that would have been
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
its true Joe found slick boxers the most difficult style (he obliterated everyone else 😀)
I'd refer you to Britkids comment earlier, if Joe had been born 40 years later, he would have been a couple of inches taller and a few stone heavier with better diet and nutrition.. If he had been born in the 1980s he could have been bigger than Anthiny Joshua. He was bigger than the average guy than Joshua.
Both all time greats though, what a fight that would have been
It was more the styles than size that would be the reason that Ali would win. If Billy Conn could cause Joe to struggle then Ali would be a nightmare.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
I got involved in a facebook thread where someone had questioned if Ali really was the greatest.
Some guys in their 20s were arguing it was Tyson.
Despite my arguments they were having a none of it, even when I pointed out Tyson never won a fight where he had to overcome adversity - one of them even said none of them were a match for Anthony Joshua:rolleyes: and was being serious.
Is this what we are going to have to endure from the next generation of fight fans.
God help us
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Kimbo Slice would kill Ali
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
is that before or after God killed both of them?
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
is that before or after God killed both of them?
r u talking to me, punk?
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Well it sucks we lost a legend but he was pretty old and he could not move anymore not sure how good his live was anymore. As for him being unbeatable no fighter really is although Tyson would not be the guy i would chose mental he would implode i give Lewis better shot based on style and size.
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nvsemin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
is that before or after god killed both of them?
r u talking to me, punk?
is that anger for no reason?
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
its true Joe found slick boxers the most difficult style (he obliterated everyone else ������)
I'd refer you to Britkids comment earlier, if Joe had been born 40 years later, he would have been a couple of inches taller and a few stone heavier with better diet and nutrition.. If he had been born in the 1980s he could have been bigger than Anthiny Joshua. He was bigger than the average guy than Joshua.
Both all time greats though, what a fight that would have been
I've never really understood this logic completely. Of course the very biggest guys are generally bigger now than they were way back when, but how can you say with any confidence that an individual would have been? If Willie Pep were around now, would he be a middleweight? Would Valuev have been 6'4 250 in Louis' era? There wouldn't be any featherweights alive today using that line of thought. By diet and nutrition accounting for that kind of size difference, you are almost implying that Joe Louis would have grown up malnourished or something. If your last point were true I wouldn't have posted this, but I just can't see it being the case? How much bigger is Joshua than the average guy, the dude is a giant!
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
The Ali of 1966-67 was unbeatable. The skills of Sugar ray Robinson and the heart of Rocky Marciano with the chin of Ray Mercer. Who tops that?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mrbig1
The Ali of 1966-67 was unbeatable. The skills of Sugar ray Robinson and the heart of Rocky Marciano with the chin of Ray Mercer. Who tops that?
1978 Leon Spinks
-
Re: Nobody beats 1960 to 1967 Muhammad Ali, EVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mrbig1
The Ali of 1966-67 was unbeatable. The skills of Sugar ray Robinson and the heart of Rocky Marciano with the chin of Ray Mercer. Who tops that?
64-67 for me, but point on. Cut down heading into his prime.