Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Ryder was not robbed, it was a close fight. Callum should have won it far more easily. That is as crazy as you saying Canelo ruined GGG in their first fight. :)
better get your eyes checked. giving callum five rounds is more than generous. are you terry o'connor? i'm still trying to work out when ggg stopped being a risk
So if it is possible to give Callum Smith 5 rounds then it surely can not be a robbery.
I watched their fight and think I had it a draw but to use that as an excuse that Canelo should not fight him is a bit weak. It would be Canelo's toughest challenge at super middle.
GGG is always a risk, never said he was not.
i said it would be generous to give callum five rounds, meaning not more than or at the most. i'm want canelo fighting the best, i saw ryder clearly beating callum, so he is the better opponent for me. ryder is the tougher challenge at supermiddleweight, and if you had that fight a draw, then i don't understand how you can consider callum a tougher challenge than ryder, john was considered an easy fight for callum
i also think ggg was a risk, i never said you did, some try to imply he wasn't