Helenius, Fury, Chisora, Haye, Price--who will be the last standing in 2016?

which 1 of these guys will be the last standing? who will drop by the wayside like a sack of rotten onions stinking up the division? who will turn out to be a sham, an overhyped sack of donkey crap among these heavyweight fighters?

appart from haye maybe, they will all still be around because theres very little else

in order I would say

1 Haye
2 Price
3= Chisora
3= Fury
5 Helenius

i find it hard to split chiz and fury

Chisora maybe has the biggest challenge to hang around because he has lost so many and he isnt going to wait to rebuild, it seems he is a big fight fighter and how many more big fight defeats can he take and stay worthy

Does anyone really care?

My question is: Why should we have to wait that long??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Does anyone really care?

---

I do! If Haye decides to stick around that long, I think it could be him.

Definitely not Haye because he's more of an actor. All talk, very little action, lack of heart..

Certainly not Chisora cuz he's pretty much been exposed and I dont see him making any more noise at the top level. He lost to Fury and got knocked out by Haye of all people lol . He's an afterthought.

Helenius is total shit.. He dont have a chance

PRice just got knocked out but he's still young so he can improve..

At this juncture, I would go with Tyson Fury!!

Wlad still champion and will become Olympic champion as well.
Fury as he is the youngest
Price still around
Helenius still around but lost world title fight
Chisora retitred 2015
Haye retired 2014

:vd:

Fury ftw.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus

:vd:

Fury ftw.

---

Fury will be around the longest , because Peter Fury said so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus

:vd:

Fury ftw.

---

Fury will be around the longest , because Peter Fury said so.

---

Sarcasm doesnt hide the fact that of this bunch its clearly Fury.

He would have always beaten Chisora easy. Haye was too shit scared to go theough with 2 fights with him and isnt evenanacrive fighter, his lastfight was what? 3 years ago? Mugs are still bringing him up as if he has the bollocks for a fight and is actually fighting. I might as well say Mike Tyson;D Haye is about 10 years older, hes done and when Fury beats Wlad it proves Fury is the better fighter and blows away anything Haye managed. Helenius was lucky to get a decision against Chisora and Price might still be around as long as he doesnt get hit but Fury beats them all and is by far the youngest.

Price, Chisora and Helenius are all 31, Haye is 34. Tyson is only 26!;D

Get used to Tyson being around;)

nice BUMP here------- this wqas a good thread of mine and you guys did it justice.

Fury is the winner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust

nice BUMP here------- this wqas a good thread of mine and you guys did it justice.

Fury is the winner.

---

Im interested to know whether you genuinely believe that.

I am a Fury fan. I always appreciated him but the utter rubbish I saw posted on here by some about how bad he was, it was some of the worst, biased shit iv seen against any fighter. That made me more interested in him as a fighter and I do believe that Haye didnt really want to fight him and neither does Wlad but he doesnt have a lot of choice right now seeing as Fury has got himself in to WBA and WBO mandatory position.

Right now, as long as Wilder wins and Fury lives up to his potential there is a proper fan freindly heavyweight title fight brewing between Tyson and Deontay Wilder. I also think Tyson wins that, if it gets made. That fight may never happen with the way the belts work against each other.