-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Nobody is asking you to believe in Covid. People are just asking you prove what you believe, That it doesn’t exist. It is no different to what you keep asking for.
And to be fair, “People” have put far more of a case for their beliefs than you have.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Nobody is asking you to believe in Covid. People are just asking you prove what you believe, That it doesn’t exist. It is no different to what you keep asking for.
And to be fair, “People” have put far more of a case for their beliefs than you have.
it's not my problem to prove someone else's belief to be true. they are stating this is real then they need to be able to prove that to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Anybody who's annoyed that TIC doesn't believe in COVID raise your hands....
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Anybody who's annoyed that TIC doesn't believe in COVID raise your hands....
which is why you are all trying to defend your belief with rubbish instead of questioning why you can't prove it to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Anybody who's annoyed that TIC doesn't believe in COVID raise your hands....
which is why you are all trying to defend your belief with rubbish instead of questioning why you can't prove it to be true
Anybody who wants to make TIC believe anything raise your hands....
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Anybody who's annoyed that TIC doesn't believe in COVID raise your hands....
which is why you are all trying to defend your belief with rubbish instead of questioning why you can't prove it to be true
Anybody who wants to make TIC believe
anything raise your hands....
i don't won't to believe i want to know
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Anybody who's annoyed that TIC doesn't believe in COVID raise your hands....
which is why you are all trying to defend your belief with rubbish instead of questioning why you can't prove it to be true
Anybody who wants to make TIC believe
anything raise your hands....
i don't won't to believe i want to know
Anybody give a shit what TIC wants to know raise your hands....
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
Copy and paste , rinse and repeat bull and shit, bottle and job.
people are stating something is real. i am asking them to tell me how they know that to be true. they can't & are annoyed that i won't just believe them
Anybody who's annoyed that TIC doesn't believe in COVID raise your hands....
which is why you are all trying to defend your belief with rubbish instead of questioning why you can't prove it to be true
Anybody who wants to make TIC believe
anything raise your hands....
i don't won't to believe i want to know
And your path to enlightenment has brought you to a boxing forum?
What steps are you taking to know?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
Blah,Blah, Blah. Copy and paste, rinse and repeat, bull and shit, bottle and job. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
You seem to have become a bit confused with what seems like a very rudimentary and mistaken idea on philosophical ideas. This is not unusual and has been a hotly contested area since Plato. There really is no such thing as knowledge. The 'Knowing' you keep pulling out as though it were a trump card is really nothing more than another belief. Your personal experience of anything does not even begin to qualify as any kind of objective fact or 'knowledge'. It is merely your idea of a reasonable objective fact that you believe to be true.
Given your inability to maintain any kind of rational or coherent argument we are left with no alternative but to dismiss your ' knowing' as a faith based construct in which you believe that your belief in fairies trumps everyone else's suspicion that people will fake stuff in order to feel special.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
https://i.imgflip.com/5kvjyd.jpg
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Then you'll know for sure and you won't just be believing what other people tell you.
https://www.theonion.com/vaccine-ske...source=twitter
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
https://i.imgflip.com/5kvjyd.jpg
This is very Trumpy. All you need to do is send it in a certified letter and you'd have it down cold.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
You have no credibility to lose in the first place.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
You have no credibility to lose in the first place.
i'm not the one making claims of something to be true & then not being able to prove those claims true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
You have no credibility to lose in the first place.
i'm not the one making claims of something to be true & then not being able to prove those claims true
You claim it doesn’t exist. PROVE IT!
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Copy and paste, rinse and repeat, bull and shit, bottle and job. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
You have no credibility to lose in the first place.
i'm not the one making claims of something to be true & then not being able to prove those claims true
You claim it doesn’t exist. PROVE IT!
people are stating that there is a virus called covid 19 that is caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. it is their job to prove that to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
You have no credibility to lose in the first place.
i'm not the one making claims of something to be true & then not being able to prove those claims true
You claim it doesn’t exist. PROVE IT!
people are stating that there is a virus called covid 19 that is caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. it is their job to prove that to be true
“people” are stating that there is NOT a virus called covid 19 that is caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. it is their job to prove that to be true. THERE YOU GO MR. COPY AND PASTE.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
If you want to know the side effects it is easy
The UK government has a website that records these, called MHRA yellow card reporting system
The only problem is only about 5% get recorded, so you need to bear that in mind
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...card-reporting
The number of serous injuries logged caused by the vax so far in the UK is 1,165,636 which equates to over 20 million serious reactions if it is a 5% reporting rate
Click on the link and you can check the varieties of injuries caused
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/30/u...-patients.html
That's quite a lot of people going to hospital each day, no matter how deadly or not so deadly this belief is, that's a lot of fellows heeding hospital treatment which buggers everything else up hospital wise....bad stuff, it's a shame there's no obvious solution to this problem, it'd be nice if there was some treatment that would stop people needing this attention from hospitals... I'll look through the items on the vet's shelves and get back to everyone.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you made a claim that you know the virus exists & were asked to prove how you know this to be true. you haven't been able to & have been outed as a liar. you are just a believer. i'm not interested in your belief until you can tell me how you know it to be true
You made a claim that the virus doesn't exist and were asked to prove how you know it to be true. You replied that the only people capable of knowing whtehr the virus exists or not are virologists and similarly qualified medical professionals who had personally worked on the virus. This would amount to a few thousand people worldwide.
I pointed out that every single one of these people say that the virus exists. Given this how can you claim that the virus doesn't exist? With what evidence do you make this claim?
you claimed that you know the virus exists. it is not my belief. it is your job to prove your belief. you can't. you are admitting that you only have faith in what you have been told by others. that is not knowing. that is believing
The problem here is that we both have different standards of proof. My standard is that if every single public health/senior medical person/senior government person responsible for dealing with the virus says that the virus exists then that's good enough for me. That's proof beyond reasonable doubt, the standard adopted by educated humans in civilised countries over many centuries who have constructed our systems of justice and arbitration. I'm not picking some specious standard here to try and qualify a shaky assumption or guess as to whether the virus exists, I'm literally using the accepted standard used in every modern society.
Your standard is significantly higher than mine which is why you think that my standard isn't proof enough that the virus exists and the reason that we're having this disagreement. Your standard of proof is that only suitably qualified medical professionals who have personal hands on experience of the virus can say whether the virus exists or not.
Luckily both of our standards have been met! Every single qualified person who has had contact with the virus says that it does in fact exist!
So we both agree that the virus exists. Well done.
i'm asking you to prove your claim that you know the virus exists to be true. believing what others have said isn't proof of you knowing. only that you believe. i've never said anything about suitably qualified medical professionals. you are making up more lies. it may be good enough for you to have faith in what others say but that is not knowing. that is just believing. thanks for admitting that you only have a belief
We've established that both our standards for proving whether the virus exists have been met. Now all that's left is to work out what fucked up pathologies in your head don't allow you to accept the evidence.
we've established that you put your faith in what you have been told by others. that is believing. not knowing. i'm not interested in your beliefs
What would constitute proof that the virus exists in your opinion?
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
You have no credibility to lose in the first place.
i'm not the one making claims of something to be true & then not being able to prove those claims true
You claim it doesn’t exist. PROVE IT!
people are stating that there is a virus called covid 19 that is caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. it is their job to prove that to be true
“people” are stating that there is NOT a virus called covid 19 that is caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. it is their job to prove that to be true. THERE YOU GO MR. COPY AND PASTE.
nice try but they wouldn't be saying there is no virus called covid 19 caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces if that claim wasn't made originally
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
However, you BELIEVE that there is no Covid. Fuck what everyone says. You believe it doesn’t exist. PROVE YOUR BELIEF. it’s not difficult mate.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
you're wanting me to tell you how to prove your belief? you made claims that you haven't been able to prove are true. that makes your claim spurious. you have lost all your credibility
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bornlivelife
If you want to know the side effects it is easy
The UK government has a website that records these, called MHRA yellow card reporting system
The only problem is only about 5% get recorded, so you need to bear that in mind
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...card-reporting
The number of serous injuries logged caused by the vax so far in the UK is 1,165,636 which equates to over 20 million serious reactions if it is a 5% reporting rate
Click on the link and you can check the varieties of injuries caused
As of 18 August 2021, for the UK, 107,215 Yellow Cards have been reported for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, 229,134 have been reported for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 14,019 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 1036 have been reported where the brand of the vaccine was not specified.
For the Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca and COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna the overall reporting rate is around 3 to 7 Yellow Cards per 1,000 doses administered.
[...]
The Yellow Card scheme is a mechanism by which anybody can voluntarily report any suspected adverse reactions or side effects to the vaccine. It is very important to note that a Yellow Card report does not necessarily mean the vaccine caused that reaction or event. We ask for any suspicions to be reported, even if the reporter isn’t sure if it was caused by the vaccine. Reports to the scheme are known as suspected adverse reactions (ADRs).
For all COVID-19 vaccines, the overwhelming majority of reports relate to injection-site reactions (sore arm for example) and generalised symptoms such as ‘flu-like’ illness, headache, chills, fatigue (tiredness), nausea (feeling sick), fever, dizziness, weakness, aching muscles, and rapid heartbeat. Generally, these happen shortly after the vaccination and are not associated with more serious or lasting illness.
These types of reactions reflect the normal immune response triggered by the body to the vaccines. They are typically seen with most types of vaccine and tend to resolve within a day or two.
So according to the data 0.5% of people report having a sore arm. Serious reactions or illness that requires hospital treatment is something like 0.00001% of the population according to actual NHS data, not the yellow card reporting system.
Who is this, Brockton?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
There are people out there sticking horse paste up their arses to avoid getting the virus and shitting their intestinal linings out in great big strips that they think are giant worms and they're smarter than the people who think the virus doesn't exist:
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1430904395697328134
https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald/stat...03142841327621
I honestly thought all the talk radio conservatives were all grifters who were in on the con but it turns out some of them actually believe all the shit they come out with:
https://twitter.com/Timodc/status/1431850156995985408
This is just shameful. People reacting to masks claiming it's tyranny when really it's just a mild inconvenience. Screaming about government control and so on, when the pandemic is over and things go back to normal and they're not forced to wear a mask or be injected or whatever not a single one of them will stop and consider they got it wrong. Instead they'll be wetting the bed over whatever crap Fox News is pumping out:
https://twitter.com/peterbakernyt/st...71817296629762
Relatedly:
https://twitter.com/SmartAssJen/stat...93390224429056
And this is outstanding. The history of vaccines in America. You have to read this:
https://twitter.com/michaelharriot/s...60194276659203
Lots of posts. Keep scrolling.