-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
i still haven't had one & never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask. surely the boogeyman will get me soon. pity i never get sick
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i still haven't had one & never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask. surely the boogeyman will get me soon. pity i never get sick
Never say never.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i still haven't had one & never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask. surely the boogeyman will get me soon. pity i never get sick
There seems to be no end to the things you have never done and never will do. Impressive stuff. :p
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
Of corse he does.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
I know I've touched a nerve when you start with the childish attempts at insults. :D
YOU claimed if he "got sick within those two weeks" that he "would be considered unvaxxed."
THAT is your claim. Where's your PROOF that he would be considered unvaxxed?? Where did you get THAT nugget of wisdom?
Or are you just making shit up as you go along... :rolleyes: ;)
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Second group people latest:
As if attempting to one-up last week’s stupidity with regards to ivermectin, anti-vaxxers on Facebook and Twitter are advocating for a new and unproven Covid-19 treatment: Betadine, an antiseptic used to treat cuts and scrapes.
Povidone iodine, often sold under the brand-name Betadine, is an iodine-based treatment largely for topical use that kills bacteria. It’s a “commonly used cleanser in the ER and OR,” says Kenneth Weinberg, an emergency room physician in New York City. “If you’re in the ER and someone has a wound to sew it up, you use it to clean with.” When told that anti-vaxxers had taken to gargling with Betadine, Weinberg said, “Fuck me! Of course they are.”......
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture...utm_id=1225438
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
I know I've touched a nerve when you start with the childish attempts at insults. :D
YOU claimed if he "got sick within those two weeks" that he "would be considered unvaxxed."
THAT is your claim. Where's your PROOF that he would be considered unvaxxed?? Where did you get THAT nugget of wisdom?
Or are you just making shit up as you go along... :rolleyes: ;)
the cdc themselves tell you that you are not considered fully vaxxed until after two weeks after your shots
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_YQe43V...jpg&name=large
i can only tell you what i have seen with my own eyes, you will have to confirm it for yourself. had a mate get sick seventy two hours after his second shot. went into hospital. i've seen the paperwork with my own eyes. it lists him as unvaxxed. take it as you will
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
I know I've touched a nerve when you start with the childish attempts at insults. :D
YOU claimed if he "got sick within those two weeks" that he "would be considered unvaxxed."
THAT is your claim. Where's your PROOF that he would be considered unvaxxed?? Where did you get THAT nugget of wisdom?
Or are you just making shit up as you go along... :rolleyes: ;)
the cdc themselves tell you that you are not considered fully vaxxed until after two weeks after your shots
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_YQe43V...jpg&name=large
i can only tell you what i have seen with my own eyes, you will have to confirm it for yourself. had a mate get sick seventy two hours after his second shot. went into hospital. i've seen the paperwork with my own eyes. it lists him as unvaxxed. take it as you will
What did your mate get sick with? Out of curiosity.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
How the fuck you have not choked on your own word salad by now is beyond me but let us pretend for just one moment that you are worth even replying to.
Here you are in a posted reply displaying not just for everyone who posts and reads on Saddo but anyone who chooses to browse the internet, your own breathtaking ignorance of not just life in general and the sibject in hand but the actual mechanics of debate and building an argument.
The only one being fallacious here is you. In fact it would be more accurate to define your deceptive and fallacious reasoning as specious.
It is a textbook case of specious reasoning.
It begins by masquerading your opinion as fact. It is based on your emotional beliefs and delusions and displays very clearly your own disdain for facts and actual evidence. You create a false unattainable bar, that by definition, no evidence can ever reach. Making you God and everyone else an idiot. When Kirkland said you reminded him of a child imagining that the vegetables were not on his plate in order to avoid eating them, he hit the nail on the head. You hate science because it requires you question and test your own assumptions and you refuse to do that.
You change the subject with Strawman arguments all the time, and then accuse others of doing so. This is common in specious arguments. People ask you questions and you refuse to answer. You use selective arguments to ignore any unfavorable evidence which is again classic specious reasoning and start with such a flawed premise that all your following logic is pointless. Circular logic, Syllogisms, Rhetorical traps, Virtue Signalling all elements of specious reasoning litter your posts and replies.
Look at the bollocks you typed above
" I am asking you to prove something is true but will not let you know the standard or rules i will accept as proof it is true. Even though nobody has ever asked me to, I am going to pretend they have, and suggest it is not my job to make your case for you. Where is Beanz and why do you keep calling in other posters even though i have just done that? So why do you keep bringing up other people, because even though i just did, really i am not attention seeking, but just speaking to you. Read this very carefully. I am a patronising prick and i will never ever engage with any of you losers on this board because I am the King of the teenage edgelords and I can win any argument by simply pretending that there is no such thing as science, books, research, knowledge, facts etc..only my opinion, the opinion of a cheesy puffs filled Kool Aid drinker counts"
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
I know I've touched a nerve when you start with the childish attempts at insults. :D
YOU claimed if he "got sick within those two weeks" that he "would be considered unvaxxed."
THAT is your claim. Where's your PROOF that he would be considered unvaxxed?? Where did you get THAT nugget of wisdom?
Or are you just making shit up as you go along... :rolleyes: ;)
the cdc themselves tell you that you are not considered fully vaxxed until after two weeks after your shots
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_YQe43V...jpg&name=large
i can only tell you what i have seen with my own eyes, you will have to confirm it for yourself. had a mate get sick seventy two hours after his second shot. went into hospital. i've seen the paperwork with my own eyes. it lists him as unvaxxed. take it as you will
What did your mate get sick with? Out of curiosity.
i wouldn't claim to know but they told him it was a heart attack
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
How the fuck you have not choked on your own word salad by now is beyond me but let us pretend for just one moment that you are worth even replying to.
Here you are in a posted reply displaying not just for everyone who posts and reads on Saddo but anyone who chooses to browse the internet, your own breathtaking ignorance of not just life in general and the sibject in hand but the actual mechanics of debate and building an argument.
The only one being fallacious here is you. In fact it would be more accurate to define your deceptive and fallacious reasoning as specious.
It is a textbook case of specious reasoning.
It begins by masquerading your opinion as fact. It is based on your emotional beliefs and delusions and displays very clearly your own disdain for facts and actual evidence. You create a false unattainable bar, that by definition, no evidence can ever reach. Making you God and everyone else an idiot. When Kirkland said you reminded him of a child imagining that the vegetables were not on his plate in order to avoid eating them, he hit the nail on the head. You hate science because it requires you question and test your own assumptions and you refuse to do that.
You change the subject with Strawman arguments all the time, and then accuse others of doing so. This is common in specious arguments. People ask you questions and you refuse to answer. You use selective arguments to ignore any unfavorable evidence which is again classic specious reasoning and start with such a flawed premise that all your following logic is pointless. Circular logic, Syllogisms, Rhetorical traps, Virtue Signalling all elements of specious reasoning litter your posts and replies.
Look at the bollocks you typed above
" I am asking you to prove something is true but will not let you know the standard or rules i will accept as proof it is true. Even though nobody has ever asked me to, I am going to pretend they have, and suggest it is not my job to make your case for you. Where is Beanz and why do you keep calling in other posters even though i have just done that? So why do you keep bringing up other people, because even though i just did, really i am not attention seeking, but just speaking to you. Read this very carefully. I am a patronising prick and i will never ever engage with any of you losers on this board because I am the King of the teenage edgelords and I can win any argument by simply pretending that there is no such thing as science, books, research, knowledge, facts etc..only my opinion, the opinion of a cheesy puffs filled Kool Aid drinker counts"
go take your pills spastic. you can't even understand what is being said. he made a claim & was asked to prove it to be true. he keeps mentioning other people such as so called experts. that is a fallacy. nothing to do with other posters retard. you want the standard of rules? if you claim that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces then you need to prove how you know that is true. i am an example of that claim being false. so prove how you know the claim is true or sit back down & keep your belief to yourself. i don't want to be apart of your mass psychosis seven times larry
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
How the fuck you have not choked on your own word salad by now is beyond me but let us pretend for just one moment that you are worth even replying to.
Here you are in a posted reply displaying not just for everyone who posts and reads on Saddo but anyone who chooses to browse the internet, your own breathtaking ignorance of not just life in general and the sibject in hand but the actual mechanics of debate and building an argument.
The only one being fallacious here is you. In fact it would be more accurate to define your deceptive and fallacious reasoning as specious.
It is a textbook case of specious reasoning.
It begins by masquerading your opinion as fact. It is based on your emotional beliefs and delusions and displays very clearly your own disdain for facts and actual evidence. You create a false unattainable bar, that by definition, no evidence can ever reach. Making you God and everyone else an idiot. When Kirkland said you reminded him of a child imagining that the vegetables were not on his plate in order to avoid eating them, he hit the nail on the head. You hate science because it requires you question and test your own assumptions and you refuse to do that.
You change the subject with Strawman arguments all the time, and then accuse others of doing so. This is common in specious arguments. People ask you questions and you refuse to answer. You use selective arguments to ignore any unfavorable evidence which is again classic specious reasoning and start with such a flawed premise that all your following logic is pointless. Circular logic, Syllogisms, Rhetorical traps, Virtue Signalling all elements of specious reasoning litter your posts and replies.
Look at the bollocks you typed above
" I am asking you to prove something is true but will not let you know the standard or rules i will accept as proof it is true. Even though nobody has ever asked me to, I am going to pretend they have, and suggest it is not my job to make your case for you. Where is Beanz and why do you keep calling in other posters even though i have just done that? So why do you keep bringing up other people, because even though i just did, really i am not attention seeking, but just speaking to you. Read this very carefully. I am a patronising prick and i will never ever engage with any of you losers on this board because I am the King of the teenage edgelords and I can win any argument by simply pretending that there is no such thing as science, books, research, knowledge, facts etc..only my opinion, the opinion of a cheesy puffs filled Kool Aid drinker counts"
go take your pills spastic. you can't even understand what is being said. he made a claim & was asked to prove it to be true. he keeps mentioning other people such as so called experts. that is a fallacy. nothing to do with other posters retard. you want the standard of rules? if you claim that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces then you need to prove how you know that is true. i am an example of that claim being false. so prove how you know the claim is true or sit back down & keep your belief to yourself. i don't want to be apart of your mass psychosis seven times larry
Using your own words
"You are making statements that you can't prove & making them out to be facts."
You are an example of nothing more than an easily led muppet. You need to prove how you are an example that proves covid to be a scam.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
They say that the first COVID jabs are 70-80% effective, while the second one is over 95% effective.
So why don’t they give people the second one first to be extra safe, and - if possible - give them that one twice.
In fact, what’s the point in mucking about with the first one at all?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
They say that the first COVID jabs are 70-80% effective, while the second one is over 95% effective.
So why don’t they give people the second one first to be extra safe, and - if possible - give them that one twice.
In fact, what’s the point in mucking about with the first one at all?
;D
Or give them the second one first and then only top up with the first one if and when needed?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
How the fuck you have not choked on your own word salad by now is beyond me but let us pretend for just one moment that you are worth even replying to.
Here you are in a posted reply displaying not just for everyone who posts and reads on Saddo but anyone who chooses to browse the internet, your own breathtaking ignorance of not just life in general and the sibject in hand but the actual mechanics of debate and building an argument.
The only one being fallacious here is you. In fact it would be more accurate to define your deceptive and fallacious reasoning as specious.
It is a textbook case of specious reasoning.
It begins by masquerading your opinion as fact. It is based on your emotional beliefs and delusions and displays very clearly your own disdain for facts and actual evidence. You create a false unattainable bar, that by definition, no evidence can ever reach. Making you God and everyone else an idiot. When Kirkland said you reminded him of a child imagining that the vegetables were not on his plate in order to avoid eating them, he hit the nail on the head. You hate science because it requires you question and test your own assumptions and you refuse to do that.
You change the subject with Strawman arguments all the time, and then accuse others of doing so. This is common in specious arguments. People ask you questions and you refuse to answer. You use selective arguments to ignore any unfavorable evidence which is again classic specious reasoning and start with such a flawed premise that all your following logic is pointless. Circular logic, Syllogisms, Rhetorical traps, Virtue Signalling all elements of specious reasoning litter your posts and replies.
Look at the bollocks you typed above
" I am asking you to prove something is true but will not let you know the standard or rules i will accept as proof it is true. Even though nobody has ever asked me to, I am going to pretend they have, and suggest it is not my job to make your case for you. Where is Beanz and why do you keep calling in other posters even though i have just done that? So why do you keep bringing up other people, because even though i just did, really i am not attention seeking, but just speaking to you. Read this very carefully. I am a patronising prick and i will never ever engage with any of you losers on this board because I am the King of the teenage edgelords and I can win any argument by simply pretending that there is no such thing as science, books, research, knowledge, facts etc..only my opinion, the opinion of a cheesy puffs filled Kool Aid drinker counts"
go take your pills spastic. you can't even understand what is being said. he made a claim & was asked to prove it to be true. he keeps mentioning other people such as so called experts. that is a fallacy. nothing to do with other posters retard. you want the standard of rules? if you claim that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces then you need to prove how you know that is true. i am an example of that claim being false. so prove how you know the claim is true or sit back down & keep your belief to yourself. i don't want to be apart of your mass psychosis seven times larry
Using your own words
"You are making statements that you can't prove & making them out to be facts."
You are an example of nothing more than an easily led muppet. You need to prove how you are an example that proves covid to be a scam.
i'm not the one claiming convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. that is the claim being made. those making that claim need to prove how they know this to be true. just keep believing what you've been told retard
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
They say that the first COVID jabs are 70-80% effective, while the second one is over 95% effective.
So why don’t they give people the second one first to be extra safe, and - if possible - give them that one twice.
In fact, what’s the point in mucking about with the first one at all?
don't forget the boosters. how many shots will take if they say you need more? would you take it yearly like a flu jab if that's what they tell you is needed?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
How the fuck you have not choked on your own word salad by now is beyond me but let us pretend for just one moment that you are worth even replying to.
Here you are in a posted reply displaying not just for everyone who posts and reads on Saddo but anyone who chooses to browse the internet, your own breathtaking ignorance of not just life in general and the sibject in hand but the actual mechanics of debate and building an argument.
The only one being fallacious here is you. In fact it would be more accurate to define your deceptive and fallacious reasoning as specious.
It is a textbook case of specious reasoning.
It begins by masquerading your opinion as fact. It is based on your emotional beliefs and delusions and displays very clearly your own disdain for facts and actual evidence. You create a false unattainable bar, that by definition, no evidence can ever reach. Making you God and everyone else an idiot. When Kirkland said you reminded him of a child imagining that the vegetables were not on his plate in order to avoid eating them, he hit the nail on the head. You hate science because it requires you question and test your own assumptions and you refuse to do that.
You change the subject with Strawman arguments all the time, and then accuse others of doing so. This is common in specious arguments. People ask you questions and you refuse to answer. You use selective arguments to ignore any unfavorable evidence which is again classic specious reasoning and start with such a flawed premise that all your following logic is pointless. Circular logic, Syllogisms, Rhetorical traps, Virtue Signalling all elements of specious reasoning litter your posts and replies.
Look at the bollocks you typed above
" I am asking you to prove something is true but will not let you know the standard or rules i will accept as proof it is true. Even though nobody has ever asked me to, I am going to pretend they have, and suggest it is not my job to make your case for you. Where is Beanz and why do you keep calling in other posters even though i have just done that? So why do you keep bringing up other people, because even though i just did, really i am not attention seeking, but just speaking to you. Read this very carefully. I am a patronising prick and i will never ever engage with any of you losers on this board because I am the King of the teenage edgelords and I can win any argument by simply pretending that there is no such thing as science, books, research, knowledge, facts etc..only my opinion, the opinion of a cheesy puffs filled Kool Aid drinker counts"
go take your pills spastic. you can't even understand what is being said. he made a claim & was asked to prove it to be true. he keeps mentioning other people such as so called experts. that is a fallacy. nothing to do with other posters retard. you want the standard of rules? if you claim that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces then you need to prove how you know that is true. i am an example of that claim being false. so prove how you know the claim is true or sit back down & keep your belief to yourself. i don't want to be apart of your mass psychosis seven times larry
Using your own words
"You are making statements that you can't prove & making them out to be facts."
You are an example of nothing more than an easily led muppet. You need to prove how you are an example that proves covid to be a scam.
i'm not the one claiming convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. that is the claim being made. those making that claim need to prove how they know this to be true. just keep believing what you've been told retard
Lets break this down so that even you can understand why you are so gullible and easily led.
1. "i'm not the one claiming convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces."
It is common practice to start sentences with a capital letter. This has nothing to do with being a grammar fascist and a lot more to do with people being willing to engage with you. If you can not even be bothered to use this convention it becomes very easy to dismiss you as a frivolous child or a simpleton. The same applies to calling Covid 'convid'. It may be funny the first time (debatable) but it certainly is not on it's one hundredth outing.
Now the most important thing about this sentence is that nobody is alleging you are claiming that you believe Covid is real or that you believe like many viruses it can be caught off surfaces or by breathing in droplets in the air. This is just you running away again and refusing to acknowledge any other poster unless you are trolling them. It seems you are incapable of conducting a conversation.
2. "that is the claim being made".
Capital letter.
This is not a claim that is being made, it is a clearly demonstrable fact.
3."those making that claim need to prove how they know this to be true."
Capital letter.
This is a nonsense sentence. Who are you referring to?
Posters on this forum?
Virologists?
Public Health Scientists?
Intensive Care Doctors and Nurses?
Paramedics?
Vaccine development technicians?
General Practitioners?
There is enough evidence, demonstrative, real, testimonial and documentary. ( What you see, experience, read and are told) for the existence of Covid that your vacuous and frivolous demands can be discounted as the raving of a jibbering idiot.
It is in fact YOU who need to prove why we should believe your claim that Covid does not exist. You can't do this without referring to your script and relying on what other people on the internet have told you. You can't even back up the claim that you made about you yourself somehow being the evidence that refutes the reality of millions of people across the world. You don't have any evidence. You are full of shit.
4."just keep believing what you've been told retard"
What you believe as an easily led naive fool, is not the same thing as the personal,demonstrative, testimonial and documentary evidence we as responsible adult members of society have witnessed and experienced over the last 18 months. We have all either personally had Covid or known family, friends and/or colleagues who have tested positive and got sick. It has effected our livelihoods, social lives, finances, mental health and well being and none of us are stupid enough to just allow and believe what we are told, when making those changes.
It seems you are projecting. Stop believing what some grifter on the internet is telling you
YOU need to prove why we should believe your claim that Covid does not exist.
Starting
NOW.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
They say that the first COVID jabs are 70-80% effective, while the second one is over 95% effective.
So why don’t they give people the second one first to be extra safe, and - if possible - give them that one twice.
In fact, what’s the point in mucking about with the first one at all?
don't forget the boosters. how many shots will take if they say you need more? would you take it yearly like a flu jab if that's what they tell you is needed?
Exactly, if the boosters are so good why did they bother vaccinating everyone with the first two shots? We could all have just had them in the first place couldn’t we?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
i am referring to the person making the claim at the time. so since we are talking that is you right now. since you claimed it is demonstrable please provide me your processes of how you isolated convid from a person showing how they were infected from outside the body & then how you infected another healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. how do you know your family members had convid? tell me the processes you used that prove how you know that claim is true. not something someone else has told you. what you have actually done to prove your claims to be true. back up your claims spastic
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i am referring to the person making the claim at the time. so since we are talking that is you right now. since you claimed it is demonstrable please provide me your processes of how you isolated convid from a person showing how they were infected from outside the body & then how you infected another healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. how do you know your family members had convid? tell me the processes you used that prove how you know that claim is true. not something someone else has told you. what you have actually done to prove your claims to be true. back up your claims spastic
So you don't believe in science? You don't believe in experts or expertise? You don't believe in the results of experiments unless you undertake them yourself?
I am assuming then that you have not and never will visit a doctor or hospital because you believe you know more about medicine and human biology than millions of qualified experts around the world
What qualifications and certification do you have to verify your ability to even understand how science, experiments and viruses and vaccines work?
YOU live your entire life based on what someone else has told you. Coronavirus is an airborne virus but if you have conducted experiments to disprove this you now have the opportunity to share them here.
Let's hear all about the rigorous large scale studies you have presided over that prove all the medical experts have got it wrong.
In fact give me one reason why I should discount all the medical and hospital staff that looked after the family members who got sick with Covid and listen to what you are telling me?
Tell me the processes you have used to prove your childish and outlandish claims are true?
After all you keep telling us not to believe something others have told us.
Out with it and stop stalling.
Where are
YOUR workings
YOUR data
YOUR scientific methods and process
YOUR experiments
YOUR personal experience
YOUR ground breaking research
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i am referring to the person making the claim at the time. so since we are talking that is you right now. since you claimed it is demonstrable please provide me your processes of how you isolated convid from a person showing how they were infected from outside the body & then how you infected another healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. how do you know your family members had convid? tell me the processes you used that prove how you know that claim is true. not something someone else has told you. what you have actually done to prove your claims to be true. back up your claims spastic
So you don't believe in science? You don't believe in experts or expertise? You don't believe in the results of experiments unless you undertake them yourself?
I am assuming then that you have not and never will visit a doctor or hospital because you believe you know more about medicine and human biology than millions of qualified experts around the world
What qualifications and certification do you have to verify your ability to even understand how science, experiments and viruses and vaccines work?
YOU live your entire life based on what someone else has told you. Coronavirus is an airborne virus but if you have conducted experiments to disprove this you now have the opportunity to share them here.
Let's hear all about the rigorous large scale studies you have presided over that prove all the medical experts have got it wrong.
In fact give me one reason why I should discount all the medical and hospital staff that looked after the family members who got sick with Covid and listen to what you are telling me?
Tell me the processes you have used to prove your childish and outlandish claims are true?
After all you keep telling us not to believe something others have told us.
Out with it and stop stalling.
Where are
YOUR workings
YOUR data
YOUR scientific methods and process
YOUR experiments
YOUR personal experience
YOUR ground breaking research
you were asked to prove your claims to be true spastic but you shit yourself as i knew you would
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's "caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i am referring to the person making the claim at the time. so since we are talking that is you right now. since you claimed it is demonstrable please provide me your processes of how you isolated convid from a person showing how they were infected from outside the body & then how you infected another healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. how do you know your family members had convid? tell me the processes you used that prove how you know that claim is true. not something someone else has told you. what you have actually done to prove your claims to be true. back up your claims spastic
So you don't believe in science? You don't believe in experts or expertise? You don't believe in the results of experiments unless you undertake them yourself?
I am assuming then that you have not and never will visit a doctor or hospital because you believe you know more about medicine and human biology than millions of qualified experts around the world
What qualifications and certification do you have to verify your ability to even understand how science, experiments and viruses and vaccines work?
YOU live your entire life based on what someone else has told you. Coronavirus is an airborne virus but if you have conducted experiments to disprove this you now have the opportunity to share them here.
Let's hear all about the rigorous large scale studies you have presided over that prove all the medical experts have got it wrong.
In fact give me one reason why I should discount all the medical and hospital staff that looked after the family members who got sick with Covid and listen to what you are telling me?
Tell me the processes you have used to prove your childish and outlandish claims are true?
After all you keep telling us not to believe something others have told us.
Out with it and stop stalling.
Where are
YOUR workings
YOUR data
YOUR scientific methods and process
YOUR experiments
YOUR personal experience
YOUR ground breaking research
you were asked to prove your claims to be true spastic but you shit yourself as i knew you would
It is impossible to answer your question because you are inventing my side of the conversation. Not only that but you have not said what you believe constitutes evidence. It is almost like you are using a piss poor understanding of Neuro Linguistic Programming to put together a 'Blueprint of Mind Control' yourself. Like a Boy's own Psychology manual made out of out of date lottery tickets and the coffee stained and barely legible synopsis of 100 esoteric books from the local library.
You sound very frightened.
Is there a reason that you are so fearful?
Do you not believe in the existence of viruses in general or just not in the existence of coronavirus?
Next you will be telling us all how Covid is really just a nasty viral pneumonia and that we are all living with the fallout from a 'Plandemic'.
Nice one Jim.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i am referring to the person making the claim at the time. so since we are talking that is you right now. since you claimed it is demonstrable please provide me your processes of how you isolated convid from a person showing how they were infected from outside the body & then how you infected another healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. how do you know your family members had convid? tell me the processes you used that prove how you know that claim is true. not something someone else has told you. what you have actually done to prove your claims to be true. back up your claims spastic
So you don't believe in science? You don't believe in experts or expertise? You don't believe in the results of experiments unless you undertake them yourself?
I am assuming then that you have not and never will visit a doctor or hospital because you believe you know more about medicine and human biology than millions of qualified experts around the world
What qualifications and certification do you have to verify your ability to even understand how science, experiments and viruses and vaccines work?
YOU live your entire life based on what someone else has told you. Coronavirus is an airborne virus but if you have conducted experiments to disprove this you now have the opportunity to share them here.
Let's hear all about the rigorous large scale studies you have presided over that prove all the medical experts have got it wrong.
In fact give me one reason why I should discount all the medical and hospital staff that looked after the family members who got sick with Covid and listen to what you are telling me?
Tell me the processes you have used to prove your childish and outlandish claims are true?
After all you keep telling us not to believe something others have told us.
Out with it and stop stalling.
Where are
YOUR workings
YOUR data
YOUR scientific methods and process
YOUR experiments
YOUR personal experience
YOUR ground breaking research
you were asked to prove your claims to be true spastic but you shit yourself as i knew you would
It is impossible to answer your question because you are inventing my side of the conversation. Not only that but you have not said what you believe constitutes evidence. It is almost like you are using a piss poor understanding of Neuro Linguistic Programming to put together a 'Blueprint of Mind Control' yourself. Like a Boy's own Psychology manual made out of out of date lottery tickets and the coffee stained and barely legible synopsis of 100 esoteric books from the local library.
You sound very frightened.
Is there a reason that you are so fearful?
Do you not believe in the existence of viruses in general or just not in the existence of coronavirus?
Next you will be telling us all how Covid is really just a nasty viral pneumonia and that we are all living with the fallout from a
'Plandemic'.
Nice one Jim.
i didn't invent you saying it's a demonstrable fact spastic. i have asked you to provide your processes that you completed demonstrate this fact you claimed. don't worry about what i'll be telling you next. deal with proving your claim to be true retard
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Bloody ell you guys will be arguing if the world is flat or not before long..................
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
your hand wave dismissal only goes to highlight your inability to prove your claims to be true dipshit
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
your hand wave dismissal only goes to highlight your inability to prove your claims to be true dipshit
Once again, unless you can provide some evidence to back up your argument you're just another ranting nutter on the internet.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
your hand wave dismissal only goes to highlight your inability to prove your claims to be true dipshit
Once again, unless you can provide some evidence to back up your argument you're just another ranting nutter on the internet.
so you are admitting you are unable to back up your claim of how you know it exists? knowing & believing are two different things. don't make claims that you know something is real that you can't prove to be true because i will continue to highlight your stupidity
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?