why are you unable to understand that's not how it works. covid is the claim. that needs to be proven to be true
Printable View
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
Quote:
Quote:
That it's taken you 20 years is a colossal feat.
Only on this forum does an innocent question about the weather, for instance, is enough to start an argument.
I'll be nice and call it "debate", like you did. But in all honesty it usually devolves beyond that. ;D
That being said................ "Look at what you started!" :mad: :D
@Mark TKO
30 pages and almost 5 months later...
Happy now?? :mad:
;D:D;)
How WHAT fucking works? “Covid is the claim” what shit does that mean? It sounds like “Grease is the word”;D;DQuote:
why are you unable to understand that's not how it works. covid is the claim. that needs to be proven to be true
Mate, you are struggling big time here. You have not ONCE in the best part of 500 posts and 30 pages of drivel posted anything to make people understand your BELIEF, your CLAIM, your POINT OF. VIEW .
“How it works” my pedigree chum , is People say Covid exists, you refute that, you DON’T BELIEVE IT. THIS MEANS YOU BELIEVE IT DOES NOT EXIST. If you expect people to prove it exists, you have to expect that they will expect the same from you.
You’re making yourself look silly here mate.
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
My biggest thread ever after my Rocky tour 12 years ago. Unlike that thread I have stopped reading this one after the first few replies as it became something else....
Only asked a question that day after feeling rough...
My 18 year old has had both jabs now. No issues at all.
Want the 16 year old to get his too. Think they only need the one jab.
the claim is covid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. that claim needs to be proven to be trueQuote:
How WHAT fucking works? “Covid is the claim” what shit does that mean? It sounds like “Grease is the word”;D;DQuote:
why are you unable to understand that's not how it works. covid is the claim. that needs to be proven to be true
Mate, you are struggling big time here. You have not ONCE in the best part of 500 posts and 30 pages of drivel posted anything to make people understand your BELIEF, your CLAIM, your POINT OF. VIEW .
“How it works” my pedigree chum , is People say Covid exists, you refute that, you DON’T BELIEVE IT. THIS MEANS YOU BELIEVE IT DOES NOT EXIST. If you expect people to prove it exists, you have to expect that they will expect the same from you.
You’re making yourself look silly here mate.
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
Ah... don't worry. I'll be back to poking fun in my next post. :D :cool:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
If the existence of the virus and the fact that it infects people making them sick could be demonstrated in front of you and you were capable of understanding it would you then accept that the virus exists?
Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
You're making a claim that the virus isn't real, that the whole thing is a con. What evidence do you have that the virus is a con?
why haven't you provided your processes?Quote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
If the existence of the virus and the fact that it infects people making them sick could be demonstrated in front of you and you were capable of understanding it would you then accept that the virus exists?
the original claim is that covid is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. that claim needs to be proven to be trueQuote:
Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
You're making a claim that the virus isn't real, that the whole thing is a con. What evidence do you have that the virus is a con?
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
This is a guy who claimed that the George Floyd killing was faked, that climate change is a scam, that screen shotted a still from Brocks video of his wife and used it as his avatar with a derogatory message.
He is a full time troll, very likely a young single lad who identifies as an Incel (Look at his Thottery Avatar), who assume that three or four of us who have all talked for years outside of Saddo were the same poster ( Sock account ) probably because that is his own M.O.
He will never provide proof of anything he claims because he thinks he is better than everyone here, and has yet to answer one question anyone asks him. I mean who else has literally nobody on their friends list here?
He is a perfect example of a little knowledge being dangerous. Just look at his signature and obsession with ancient symbols.
The Crook and Flail seems almost as pretentious as using a Fasces?
So TIC
What makes you claim that Jesus is real?
Surely that is just a belief?
Quote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.:cool:
Technically one could say yes...now the (where) becomes the question. AKA swimming in his daddy's ballsack would mean...uh yes he was there!
Now that leads us down the rabbit hole of one being able to push it back and claim that none of us -cannot disprove it wasn't he that got skeeted out and hit the ovaries first. Man, this dude is kinda winning via stalemate! hahahaaa! 2,3, 4 posters now on him and he still won't lose his cool!
Man he lost his cool not long after joining.Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.:cool:
Technically one could say yes...now the (where) becomes the question. AKA swimming in his daddy's ballsack would mean...uh yes he was there!
Now that leads us down the rabbit hole of one being able to push it back and claim that none of us -cannot disprove it wasn't he that got skeeted out and hit the ovaries first. Man, this dude is kinda winning via stalemate! hahahaaa! 2,3, 4 posters now on him and he still won't lose his cool!
If you have to resort to calling people 'spastics' and screen shotting an image of a posters wife and using it as a sig/avatar with a derogatory statement you have pretty much outed yourself as a troll.
Having a different opinion is fine, but when like TIC that leads to you slagging off EVERYONE who disagrees with you and refusing to answer any questions or engage in any kind of debate ....you lost .. big time.
This is a guy who clearly still lives with his Mom and counts pretending that the rest of the world is deluded while he has been gifted with clear sight as some kind of ..'winning' ;D
Manny Pacquiaio
Oscar De La Hoya
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/boxin...vid-holyfield/
Quote:
Man he lost his cool not long after joining.Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.:cool:
Technically one could say yes...now the (where) becomes the question. AKA swimming in his daddy's ballsack would mean...uh yes he was there!
Now that leads us down the rabbit hole of one being able to push it back and claim that none of us -cannot disprove it wasn't he that got skeeted out and hit the ovaries first. Man, this dude is kinda winning via stalemate! hahahaaa! 2,3, 4 posters now on him and he still won't lose his cool!
If you have to resort to calling people 'spastics' and screen shotting an image of a posters wife and using it as a sig/avatar with a derogatory statement you have pretty much outed yourself as a troll.
Having a different opinion is fine, but when like TIC that leads to you slagging off EVERYONE who disagrees with you and refusing to answer any questions or engage in any kind of debate ....you lost .. big time.
This is a guy who clearly still lives with his Mom and counts pretending that the rest of the world is deluded while he has been gifted with clear sight as some kind of ..'winning' ;D
dont think he ever had any cool to lose
i never claimed jesus was real you liar seven times larry. all that nonsense you posted & not one proof to back up your belief & how you know it to be trueQuote:
This is a guy who claimed that the George Floyd killing was faked, that climate change is a scam, that screen shotted a still from Brocks video of his wife and used it as his avatar with a derogatory message.
He is a full time troll, very likely a young single lad who identifies as an Incel (Look at his Thottery Avatar), who assume that three or four of us who have all talked for years outside of Saddo were the same poster ( Sock account ) probably because that is his own M.O.
He will never provide proof of anything he claims because he thinks he is better than everyone here, and has yet to answer one question anyone asks him. I mean who else has literally nobody on their friends list here?
He is a perfect example of a little knowledge being dangerous. Just look at his signature and obsession with ancient symbols.
The Crook and Flail seems almost as pretentious as using a Fasces?
So TIC
What makes you claim that Jesus is real?
Surely that is just a belief?
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
poor oscar went the last eighteen months without getting this so call virus. gets doubled jabbed & then gets it. lucky how holyfield was filing for arbitration with triller & then this spot opened upQuote:
Just trying to perceive what you class as “real” depending on that answer , I can understand your argument better.Quote:
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
But you’re so paranoid, and have talked so much shit, you’re scared to write something in case it contradicts what you have previously said. BOTTLE JOB!
why would i bother? you can't even understand the concept that if someone claims something to be real it is on them to prove that to be trueQuote:
Just trying to perceive what you class as “real” depending on that answer , I can understand your argument better.Quote:
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
But you’re so paranoid, and have talked so much shit, you’re scared to write something in case it contradicts what you have previously said. BOTTLE JOB!
I bet you’re a bundle of laughs at Christmas time …….
Tell me some thing you believe is real?Quote:
why would i bother? you can't even understand the concept that if someone claims something to be real it is on them to prove that to be trueQuote:
Just trying to perceive what you class as “real” depending on that answer , I can understand your argument better.Quote:
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
But you’re so paranoid, and have talked so much shit, you’re scared to write something in case it contradicts what you have previously said. BOTTLE JOB!
Quote:
This is a guy who claimed that the George Floyd killing was faked, that climate change is a scam, that screen shotted a still from Brocks video of his wife and used it as his avatar with a derogatory message.
He is a full time troll, very likely a young single lad who identifies as an Incel (Look at his Thottery Avatar), who assume that three or four of us who have all talked for years outside of Saddo were the same poster ( Sock account ) probably because that is his own M.O.
He will never provide proof of anything he claims because he thinks he is better than everyone here, and has yet to answer one question anyone asks him. I mean who else has literally nobody on their friends list here?
He is a perfect example of a little knowledge being dangerous. Just look at his signature and obsession with ancient symbols.
The Crook and Flail seems almost as pretentious as using a Fasces?
So TIC
What makes you claim that Jesus is real?
Surely that is just a belief?
So he's just another mentally ill person on the internet then.
you haven't even been able to prove your claim to be true & can't admit to yourself that you are just a believerQuote:
Quote:
This is a guy who claimed that the George Floyd killing was faked, that climate change is a scam, that screen shotted a still from Brocks video of his wife and used it as his avatar with a derogatory message.
He is a full time troll, very likely a young single lad who identifies as an Incel (Look at his Thottery Avatar), who assume that three or four of us who have all talked for years outside of Saddo were the same poster ( Sock account ) probably because that is his own M.O.
He will never provide proof of anything he claims because he thinks he is better than everyone here, and has yet to answer one question anyone asks him. I mean who else has literally nobody on their friends list here?
He is a perfect example of a little knowledge being dangerous. Just look at his signature and obsession with ancient symbols.
The Crook and Flail seems almost as pretentious as using a Fasces?
So TIC
What makes you claim that Jesus is real?
Surely that is just a belief?
So he's just another mentally ill person on the internet then.
it wouldn't be a belief then would it? i would know it to be real. i know many things are real but the subject i am dealing with here is the belief that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfacesQuote:
Tell me some thing you believe is real?Quote:
why would i bother? you can't even understand the concept that if someone claims something to be real it is on them to prove that to be trueQuote:
Just trying to perceive what you class as “real” depending on that answer , I can understand your argument better.Quote:
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
But you’re so paranoid, and have talked so much shit, you’re scared to write something in case it contradicts what you have previously said. BOTTLE JOB!
Mate, you aren’t “dealing” with anything.Quote:
it wouldn't be a belief then would it? i would know it to be real. i know many things are real but the subject i am dealing with here is the belief that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfacesQuote:
Tell me some thing you believe is real?Quote:
why would i bother? you can't even understand the concept that if someone claims something to be real it is on them to prove that to be trueQuote:
Just trying to perceive what you class as “real” depending on that answer , I can understand your argument better.Quote:
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
But you’re so paranoid, and have talked so much shit, you’re scared to write something in case it contradicts what you have previously said. BOTTLE JOB!
highlighting peoples beliefs rather than knowing. you have already admitted that you don't know. so why are you not asking those that are claiming something to be real to prove that to be true?Quote:
Mate, you aren’t “dealing” with anything.Quote:
it wouldn't be a belief then would it? i would know it to be real. i know many things are real but the subject i am dealing with here is the belief that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfacesQuote:
Tell me some thing you believe is real?Quote:
why would i bother? you can't even understand the concept that if someone claims something to be real it is on them to prove that to be trueQuote:
Just trying to perceive what you class as “real” depending on that answer , I can understand your argument better.Quote:
why? will it help you provide a proof for the questions i'm asking?Quote:
Ok, just so I know how your mind works, tell me something you claim is real?Quote:
when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be trueQuote:
Quote:
what is your proof that covid is real? i have asked you how you know. showing me the genetic code is not something you have done. you have never isolated it from a person. you are relying on what others have said. that is not you knowing. you claim that you know it exists but have to keep bringing up others. i am asking you. you suffer from the same issues seven times larry does. you can't answer from your own knowledge. ok show me what you did to isolate this virus & confirm it as convid & then infected a healthy person with it from outside the body through the air or off a surface. i am asking you specifically. not what you believe others have done just your own processes to prove your belief to be trueQuote:
Quote:
you made a claim that you know covid exists. i asked you to prove how you know that to be true. you haven't been able to. all you have done is tell me that you believe what others have told you. that is believing. not knowingQuote:
Quote:
I'm not asking you to provide proof that the virus exists. I'm wanting you to state exactly what proof you would want to see for you to accept that the virus exists.
It's interesting you should mention credibility. You appear to be under the impression that we're having some kind of legitimate argument with competing evidence on both sides. Instead this is me trying to explain reality to somebody who appears to have a tenuous grasp of it and I'm being kind here.
One one side of this nonexistent argument you have every single credible credentialled expert on viruses and pandemics. Also on the reality side are morons and crazy people who are out there eating horse dewormer to protect themselves from the virus. Even the vast majority of the nuts accept that the virus exists.
Then there are people like you, either terminally stupid and/or so nuts you think the virus doesn't exist. This is a tiny minority of people who were either incredibly unfortunate when it came to being issued intelligence or who are bona fide nutcases. So yeah, credibility.
You won't accept the proof. I can show you the genetic sequence of the virus but that would be pointless as patio furniture salesmen can't understand genetic models. In situations like this where something complicated has to be explained to unknowledgeable people, such as in a court of law, expert witnesses are used to explain the complicated stuff so that juries can have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that something happened. But you won't accept the opinion of every single qualified credentialled person on this subject.
You're saying that somebody who can't provide you with proof that you can't understand anyway only has a belief yet you believe, with zero evidence to back it up, that the virus doesn't exist. And you don't appear to be aware of how ridiculous this argument is.
You can't even state what level of proof you will accept because your answer would be picked apart and laughed at. You're like a three year old closing his eyes hoping if he doesn't look at his vegetables he won't have to eat them and they'll go away.
There are people in America right now, right as you're reading this, who have just shit parts of their intestines down the toilet. They're sitting there with shreds of their intestines literally hanging out of their arses because they've eaten deworming chemicals in the hope that the chemicals will protect them from the virus. Even these idiots have a better grasp of the situation than you do. Even these clueless nutcases accept that the virus exists. You're unable to do even that. You are even more fucked in the head than they are. Does that not give you pause for reflection here?
Whatthefuck... I'm bored. I'll jump in for a bit.
So TIC... you won't accept Kirkland showing you genetic sequencing of the virus, because... (your own words)... he didn't do it himself. I see... :rolleyes:
So basically what you're saying is that unless you've done it or seen it yourself... it's not a proven fact.
You realize that leaves out a vast majority of the knowledge a typical human being has, right?
Let's start with school. Did you learn things at school? Did you personally see or experienced everything you were taught at school?
History. You obviously weren't there. How do you know ANY of it is true?
Science. Physics, chemistry, biology. Have you personally done and seen everything they've taught you on those subjects? Or are you taking somebody else's word for it? Hmm...
You can't have it both ways. If you're gonna demand that someone actually sequences the virus and personally tells you about it... then you'd better use the same standard for everything you think you know.
What do you know about yourself? Your parents, for instance. How do you know they're actually your parents? Were you there?
Double standards shot down your measly arguments a long time ago, dude.
But you’re so paranoid, and have talked so much shit, you’re scared to write something in case it contradicts what you have previously said. BOTTLE JOB!
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
Quote:
Why thank you! Good for you.
I didn't start this thread... but whoever started it was just asking two simple questions.
He probably didn't mean to start the circus that has ensued.