Samuel Peter dominated Toney.......

[drgoodlooking]

(just kidding)

[Wacko3205]

(just kidding)

But he did beat him. Not kidding.

[drgoodlooking]

(just kidding)

But he did beat him. Not kidding.

Yes, so did Jermain win in Hopkins-Taylor I.

[Gandalf]

(just kidding)

But he did beat him. Not kidding.

Yes, so did Jermain win in Hopkins-Taylor I.

I detect the faintest whiff of irony!

[AdamGB]

I smell fanboys...

[Gandalf]

I smell fanboys...

[JT Rock]

I smell fanboys...

I smell judges

Did you see the fight Adam You Box...It was apparent who landed the cleaner more accurate and effective punches.....The ironic thing is Showtime didn't show the final Punchstats wonder why

[Gandalf]

I smell fanboys...

I smell judges

Did you see the fight Adam You Box...It was apparent who landed the cleaner more accurate and effective punches.....The ironic thing is Showtime didn't show the final Punchstats wonder why

Im not a conspiracy theory kinda guy....but you are right...

We saw NO punch stats for that fight...

[Lance Uppercut]

I smell fanboys...

I smell judges

Did you see the fight Adam You Box...It was apparent who landed the cleaner more accurate and effective punches.....The ironic thing is Showtime didn't show the final Punchstats wonder why

Im not a conspiracy theory kinda guy....but you are right...

We saw NO punch stats for that fight...

Well no reputable news source seems to disagree with the decision. Look at AP, CNN, or Sports Illistraited, none of there storys mention any thing about a bad decision. They only talk about Toney being hurt several times in the fight. SO I guess their all in on the conspiracy.

Lets face it, the only people calling this a bad decision are a handful people on this site who would probably say the same thing even if Peter had finished Toney off.

[Gandalf]

I smell fanboys...

I smell judges

Did you see the fight Adam You Box...It was apparent who landed the cleaner more accurate and effective punches.....The ironic thing is Showtime didn't show the final Punchstats wonder why

Im not a conspiracy theory kinda guy....but you are right...

We saw NO punch stats for that fight...

Well no reputable news source seems to disagree with the decision. Look at AP, CNN, or Sports Illistraited, none of there storys mention any thing about a bad decision. They only talk about Toney being hurt several times in the fight. SO I guess their all in on the conspiracy.

Lets face it, the only people calling this a bad decision are a handful people on this site who would probably say the same thing even if Peter had finished Toney off.

Are you suggesting my opinion is wrong?

Mr "James Toney will die" guy....

[JT Rock]

I smell fanboys...

I smell judges

Did you see the fight Adam You Box...It was apparent who landed the cleaner more accurate and effective punches.....The ironic thing is Showtime didn't show the final Punchstats wonder why

Im not a conspiracy theory kinda guy....but you are right...

We saw NO punch stats for that fight...

Well no reputable news source seems to disagree with the decision. Look at AP, CNN, or Sports Illistraited, none of there storys mention any thing about a bad decision. They only talk about Toney being hurt several times in the fight. SO I guess their all in on the conspiracy.

Lets face it, the only people calling this a bad decision are a handful people on this site who would probably say the same thing even if Peter had finished Toney off.

Ok so what your saying is that you didnt watch the fight then Yes Peter completely dominated Toney to the degree that even after the 1 point deduction he was up by 5 rounds on the the scorecards... sorry I saw it that way

[Gandalf]

I smell fanboys...

I smell judges

Did you see the fight Adam You Box...It was apparent who landed the cleaner more accurate and effective punches.....The ironic thing is Showtime didn't show the final Punchstats wonder why

Im not a conspiracy theory kinda guy....but you are right...

We saw NO punch stats for that fight...

Well no reputable news source seems to disagree with the decision. Look at AP, CNN, or Sports Illistraited, none of there storys mention any thing about a bad decision. They only talk about Toney being hurt several times in the fight. SO I guess their all in on the conspiracy.

Lets face it, the only people calling this a bad decision are a handful people on this site who would probably say the same thing even if Peter had finished Toney off.

Ok so what your saying is that you didnt watch the fight then Yes Peter completely dominated Toney to the degree that even after the 1 point deduction he was up by 5 rounds on the the scorecards... sorry I saw it that way

Nice, Lance is usually a reliable poster....

[Lance Uppercut]

I just think it is odd. If it was as bad of a decision as you say it was, why hasn't one news source mentioned that? Instead they are all saying the opposite.

[Gandalf]

I just think it is odd. If it was as bad of a decision as you say it was, why hasn't one news source mentioned that? Instead they are all saying the opposite.

Hasn't fightnews printed a closeup of the score card It was judged to be close...

2 judges were on medication....my final conclusions...

[JT Rock]

I just think it is odd. If it was as bad of a decision as you say it was, why hasn't one news source mentioned that? Instead they are all saying the opposite.

http://www.newsnow.co.uk/newsfeed/?name=Boxing click on this link and scan plenty of articles on it...

Espn, Sports Illustrated, and CNN are the most unreliable sources for Boxing News...