This is for everyone.
I see these people that are trying to support this Vitali instant shot thing saying "I understand Sam Peter can get his shot... AFTER Vitali gets his"
But the WBC said he could get a shot at the WBC Championship right? it didn't say who was holding it, did it?
So then can't you also say "Yeah Vitali can get his shot at the WBC champ, AFTER Peter fights Maskaev.
It can work both ways, why not letting Peter go first and Vitali fighting the winner?


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes:
Reply With Quote

). However, with Vitali, I could definetly see it. And I don't think thats a biased opinion, simple fact is Vitali doesn't need to go on fighting, he has money, political status, a phd... I think Vitali is probably twice as intelligent as Sam Peter is, but, likely because of that, I don't think he has the same interest in fighting, to be perfectly honest. Basically, I want to see Sam Peter vs Vitali as much as anyone else, that's the fight to be made right now it would seem. Now stop and think whether that is more likely to happen if Vitali gets the belt around his waist first, as opposed to if Peter does. I sure as hell don't think so.
Bookmarks