Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Way worse than the JT-Winky coverage, because this time it was all three stooges salivating over Oscars ridiculous flurries where he landed nothing. It was totally shameful, and such a transparent attempt to market a rematch that really has no reason to happen since it was a clear and pretty dominant victory for Floyd.

    Some of the most absurd aspects:

    1. There was one round toward the middle where Floyd landed about 60% of his punches (really, he did that almost every round, but this one was the highest yet). During this round, while Floyd was basically landing at will and Oscar was doing nothing, Manny Steward keeps saying "but now I think Oscar's turned it around and it's Floyd that's having trouble landing anything." Ridiculous.

    2. A couple rounds later, in a round that Floyd outlanded Oscar by a 3-1 ratio, and even threw more than Oscar, Lampley closes the round by saying "it'll be interesting to see how they score that one."

    3. The standard Lampley going crazy over ODH punches that didn't even come close to landing. And saying absolutely nothing when Floyd landed flush shots (the only flush shots in the entire fight, mind you).

    4. Old Larry Merchant constantly asking (rhetorically), "but Manny, do you think it's a good idea to base your whole fightplan on the other guy getting tired? The fight is happening NOW." As if Floyd wasn't clearly winning "NOW" anyway.

    5. Then the most obvious rematch-marketing ploy of them all (other than managing to get that one judge to actually score the fight for Oscar ), they get crazy Floyd Sr. up there AGAIN at the end so he can spew that incomprehensible nonsense about how "if you score it on a point system, you have to give it to Oscar." Floyd outlanded Oscar in almost every single round, out-power punched him in every single round, and landed at more than double Oscar's connect rate -- so explain what that meant. Anyway, they used that interview as a direct segue into the "So, will we get a rematch?" talk.

    Huge respect to Max Kellerman for ditching the HBO selling-line and telling it like it is. That was a 117-111 fight without question.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    117-111 no way on earth - check out how many of PBFs punches hit gloves arms and elbows and therefore DO NOT SCORE

    PBF won, butt 117-111 is ridiculous!!
    God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1115
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    the scores were close but i don't see a need for a rematch. PBF would most likey beat him worse than before.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1166
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    No way was that 117-111. 116-112 is even pushing it
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    I think the judges who said 115-113 for Floyd was correct but i agree with some of your other points. Especially with they way everyone kept saying "oh that round was close i think it goes to Oscar" or something like that. They didnt give any of those rounds to PBF.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H
    117-111 no way on earth - check out how many of PBFs punches hit gloves arms and elbows and therefore DO NOT SCORE

    PBF won, butt 117-111 is ridiculous!!
    Talk about punches hitting gloves, arms and elbows (not to mention air) -- watch Oscar's performance. In terms of punches actually landed, Floyd outlanded Oscar all night. What rounds could you legitimately score for Oscar. No more than 4, no way. I wouldn't see 118-110 as out of the question.

    Seriously, watch the fight again with the volume off, so you don't here the ridiculous commentary or hear the crowd going crazy every time Oscar hits air. And then score the rounds.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1166
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Mamba
    I think the judges who said 115-113 for Floyd was correct but i agree with some of your other points. Especially with they way everyone kept saying "oh that round was close i think it goes to Oscar" or something like that. They didnt give any of those rounds to PBF.
    Because Oscar was fighting his fight during those close rounds and the aggressor
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'
    the scores were close but i don't see a need for a rematch. PBF would most likey beat him worse than before.
    Yeah i agree if there were to be a rematch i think Floyd would do more in the early rounds because that was the only reason the fight was close because he didnt do enough in the early to mid rounds.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Mamba
    I think the judges who said 115-113 for Floyd was correct but i agree with some of your other points. Especially with they way everyone kept saying "oh that round was close i think it goes to Oscar" or something like that. They didnt give any of those rounds to PBF.
    Because Oscar was fighting his fight during those close rounds and the aggressor
    Oscar didn't LAND anything! That's like saying Sam Soliman beat Winky Wright.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1166
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Mamba
    I think the judges who said 115-113 for Floyd was correct but i agree with some of your other points. Especially with they way everyone kept saying "oh that round was close i think it goes to Oscar" or something like that. They didnt give any of those rounds to PBF.
    Because Oscar was fighting his fight during those close rounds and the aggressor
    Oscar didn't LAND anything!
    FLOYD WASNT LANDING EITHER
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom
    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Mamba
    I think the judges who said 115-113 for Floyd was correct but i agree with some of your other points. Especially with they way everyone kept saying "oh that round was close i think it goes to Oscar" or something like that. They didnt give any of those rounds to PBF.
    Because Oscar was fighting his fight during those close rounds and the aggressor
    Oscar didn't LAND anything!
    FLOYD WASNT LANDING EITHER
    Yes he was. He landed at over 50% the ENTIRE FIGHT. Watch it again. He was very accurate.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Can I copy this and post it on another site? I love it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    Way worse than the JT-Winky coverage, because this time it was all three stooges salivating over Oscars ridiculous flurries where he landed nothing. It was totally shameful, and such a transparent attempt to market a rematch that really has no reason to happen since it was a clear and pretty dominant victory for Floyd.

    Some of the most absurd aspects:

    1. There was one round toward the middle where Floyd landed about 60% of his punches (really, he did that almost every round, but this one was the highest yet). During this round, while Floyd was basically landing at will and Oscar was doing nothing, Manny Steward keeps saying "but now I think Oscar's turned it around and it's Floyd that's having trouble landing anything." Ridiculous.

    2. A couple rounds later, in a round that Floyd outlanded Oscar by a 3-1 ratio, and even threw more than Oscar, Lampley closes the round by saying "it'll be interesting to see how they score that one."

    3. The standard Lampley going crazy over ODH punches that didn't even come close to landing. And saying absolutely nothing when Floyd landed flush shots (the only flush shots in the entire fight, mind you).

    4. Old Larry Merchant constantly asking (rhetorically), "but Manny, do you think it's a good idea to base your whole fightplan on the other guy getting tired? The fight is happening NOW." As if Floyd wasn't clearly winning "NOW" anyway.

    5. Then the most obvious rematch-marketing ploy of them all (other than managing to get that one judge to actually score the fight for Oscar ), they get crazy Floyd Sr. up there AGAIN at the end so he can spew that incomprehensible nonsense about how "if you score it on a point system, you have to give it to Oscar." Floyd outlanded Oscar in almost every single round, out-power punched him in every single round, and landed at more than double Oscar's connect rate -- so explain what that meant. Anyway, they used that interview as a direct segue into the "So, will we get a rematch?" talk.

    Huge respect to Max Kellerman for ditching the HBO selling-line and telling it like it is. That was a 117-111 fight without question.

    A post worthy of the Posters Hall of Fame!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted The Bull
    Can I copy this and post it on another site? I love it.
    Thanks. Please do -- spread the gospel.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1166
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: That was the MOST BIASED HBO coverage I've EVER seen

    50% are you serious. He was landing on Oscars gloves and forearms most of the fight. Oscar blocks punches with his hands and arms but doesnt move his head but hes not taking most of those shots...r u lampley by the way
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing