??
??
Give Pavlik a chance to establish himself but I would would go for Barklay. Damn what an entertaining fight that would be!
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I say Pavlik wins 3 out of 5.Originally Posted by Master
i like the matchup ice
a huge middleweight that keeps coming forward that backs into athe corner and have is will on you
i chose pavlik and plus he got off the canvas to win a fight
Pavlik is the biggest Middlweight I have ever seen.. fights hard..determination factor is one of the strongest assests a fighter can have . Kelly have it..
Barkley was strange, he did have some assests but could be had. I think Iran looses by mid KO much like Miranda.
Well Barkely could bang but he never did have the best chin. I could see Pavlik stopping him brutally after 4 or 5 explosive rounds.
Iran Barkley was prone to cuts but weak chin I would say he did not have. He took a beating from Hearns and Benn can hit, and he got up each time. I would disagree with you on that.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Not only do i totally agree with Lords i feel Miranda vs. Barkley would be an even better fight.Originally Posted by Lords Gym
091
good post.. i like your posts hitmandoony, read about a dozen , have agreed with everything. this cool click thing i wish i knew how to give you one?Originally Posted by hitmandonny
![]()
It is funny El Barto we tend to agree a lot!Originally Posted by El Barto
Ul be able to dish out CC's whenever you want after you reach 100 posts.
In the mean time heres a CC for you.
091
thank youOriginally Posted by hitmandonny
I am going against the feeling here and saying Barkley would win. He did well against the taller hard punchers. The danger of Barkley was not really his power which was good but not great. It was how strong he was physically, just a strong guy.. Toney said onetime that he felt Barkley's left hook a week after it landed. But I think Barkley would throw punches during exchanges. He did not wait to get bombed on and then answer back in a seesaw. He would set as the other guy was bombing away, and that style worked well against Hearns. Hearns liked to go for broke and Barkley had a style to swing in the middle of exchanges. Against tall hard punches Barkley does well. The shorter guys he does worse against. He punches better higher. I notice when he fought shorter guys his hooks land over their heads and they duck easier. Against taller guys he had the right style. And since Hearns rarely lost, you have to say a style situation was there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks