Hey Andre...

[BoxingGorilla]

I found your youtube vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ov4b...eature=related

Can't follow this message. Does any of this make sense to you, Dre?

Bilbo?


Clubber?

[Douglas]

I just watched part of this while listening to the DBZ soundtrack. (I was listening to Pikkon's Theme).

[Douglas]

Okay, I just watched the rest of it with no music. If you understand what that guy is saying, you DON'T need to go to college, you are smart enough already. (He'll just about put you to sleep though).

It starts off with a few optical illusions, but I don't know what the hell the rest of it is though. It's like looking through a collidoscope.

[Youngblood]

It's new agism, borrowing a few scientific understandings...but largely, it lost me about 20 seconds in at the word hymen.

[Andre]

It's new agism, borrowing a few scientific understandings...but largely, it lost me about 20 seconds in at the word hymen.

'New ageism' is a label for a mixture of things thats for sure; goes nice with the word hippie .
But it is also a way to remain fixed into one view.
Also science is measurements from one fixed point of view.
Science and molecular physics is starting to realize that we can only experience about 96% of what is actually here around us just utilizing the physical measuring devices of our bodies hooked up to our brain!

Its actually all been known since way before the 'new age' picked it up and way before the men in white coats finally got to see an electron jumping in and out of their own reality.which still has alot of them stumped but most are considering dimensions as being linked because of it.
Guess what, this isnt new either.

This bloke on the tube is talking about the relationship between Charkras and their activations and their relationship on where you are at consiously, in any certain point in your timeexperience, in your ascension that is all.
Nothing to be scared of,its not a threat to the western way and our own forefathers etc ; its just looking at something from behind the mirror, or from the other side of the mountain so to speak.Some people refuse to look there because it isnt within their comfort zone and so refute that it even exists.Which is perfect too.

Its actually very old stuff from the East but its only still just comming to light in the west,so its called new. If you look into the Mayans and the Egyptians and the Asian Indians ,the Essens, they all knew things that they put into practice and from their own points of view nothing borrowed about any of it and all of it ( spiritually found first). They could measure things that really counted to them, more precise than our modern ways could without our modern implements ,this is seen as some sort of threat to our powerful western minds for some reason.

Personally I like the complimentary sections where they starting to overlap and dont care what came first or who thinks what at any certain stage in thier own time,cause its not a race, or a competition as we have been taught to do with everything.
The main thing is, for me anyway: time isn't linear its circular like the rest of the universe/utterly immeasurable and forever changing, as are all of us within it.
Change is the unknown it always will be and it is only a threat if you wish to remain in one state or hold onto a fixed view.
So the ancients Taoists truth : He who grasps, losses.

[Kel]

It's new agism, borrowing a few scientific understandings...but largely, it lost me about 20 seconds in at the word hymen.

'New ageism' is a label for a mixture of things thats for sure; goes nice with the word hippie .
But it is also a way to remain fixed into one view.
Also science is measurements from one fixed point of view.
Science and molecular physics is starting to realize that we can only experience about 96% of what is actually here around us just utilizing the physical measuring devices of our bodies hooked up to our brain!

Its actually all been known since way before the 'new age' picked it up and way before the men in white coats finally got to see an electron jumping in and out of their own reality.which still has alot of them stumped but most are considering dimensions as being linked because of it.
Guess what, this isnt new either.

This bloke on the tube is talking about the relationship between Charkras and their activations and their relationship on where you are at consiously, in any certain point in your timeexperience, in your ascension that is all.
Nothing to be scared of,its not a threat to the western way and our own forefathers etc ; its just looking at something from behind the mirror, or from the other side of the mountain so to speak.Some people refuse to look there because it isnt within their comfort zone and so refute that it even exists.Which is perfect too.

Its actually very old stuff from the East but its only still just comming to light in the west,so its called new. If you look into the Mayans and the Egyptians and the Asian Indians ,the Essens, they all knew things that they put into practice and from their own points of view nothing borrowed about any of it and all of it ( spiritually found first). They could measure things that really counted to them, more precise than our modern ways could without our modern implements ,this is seen as some sort of threat to our powerful western minds for some reason.

Personally I like the complimentary sections where they starting to overlap and dont care what came first or who thinks what at any certain stage in thier own time,cause its not a race, or a competition as we have been taught to do with everything.
The main thing is, for me anyway: time isn't linear its circular like the rest of the universe/utterly immeasurable and forever changing, as are all of us within it.
Change is the unknown it always will be and it is only a threat if you wish to remain in one state or hold onto a fixed view.
So the ancients Taoists truth : He who grasps, losses.

Your a strange, fascinating character Andre

I get the impression that once you finished that post you turned around with a cigar in your mouth, cat on your lap to admire a flying radioactive rat you created while muttering "inferior Saddo fucks"

[Andre]

Thanks I think.
although I dont like many cats or any smoke.
Would you belive two dogs and a shot of wiskey"?
"No? ahhhhh how about a girl guide and bottle of rasberry pop"?

MMM just re read that: ,I said "and thats perfect too" regarding one way of thinking; I'm not saying it in spite at all.

I mean by viewing something only one way it is the perfect road to find out whats up there and why you came at it that way without the distraction of other ways getting in the way of what you're doing .

Oh and I love you guys like brothers,all of you there is not one exception. Im proud to know such open honest people (who'd have thought you'd find such vast ideas and such different thinkers in the back room of a boxing forum. :-)

[Youngblood]

lol the term 'new ageism' struck a chord?

Without so many words, I think I pretty much nailed it, as you basically reiterated my understanding of what it means, even going so far as to add further discussion into science (which we could pick back up in the hadron debate...maybe at a later time)...to add weight to a point I believe I made. Then opened up a conversation siding towards your overall philosophy and understanding of life.

So I put it to you Andre, without going into a diatribe...what would you call it? Less words please. Try shooting for 10 or under.

I too am familiar with the Mayans, their great understandings of early maths, the cosmos, energy, their belief systems...have done my share of reading on the Egyptians, old eastern beliefs etc. Am not closed off to new ideas, or old for that matter, but tend to call things as I see them. And in simplistic terms, to me that is what that video is. I could break it down and go into the many facets it avails, historical significances, and throw on my own philosophical slant, but I am not sure why I would want to do that. That is akin to pressing a religious view on an issue, and then eventually all things.

You see, I do take a tiny offence, not in a bad way...in a friendly discussion way , at the fact you suggest that maybe I am of a fixed one dimensional view, and presenting yourself as being of such a greater view based on that.

So remember now, 10 words or less. What is that video to you?

[Andre]

lol the term 'new ageism' struck a chord?

Without so many words, I think I pretty much nailed it, as you basically reiterated my understanding of what it means, even going so far as to add further discussion into science (which we could pick back up in the hadron debate...maybe at a later time)...to add weight to a point I believe I made. Then opened up a conversation siding towards your overall philosophy and understanding of life.

So I put it to you Andre, without going into a diatribe...what would you call it? Less words please. Try shooting for 10 or under.

I too am familiar with the Mayans, their great understandings of early maths, the cosmos, energy, their belief systems...have done my share of reading on the Egyptians, old eastern beliefs etc. Am not closed off to new ideas, or old for that matter, but tend to call things as I see them. And in simplistic terms, to me that is what that video is. I could break it down and go into the many facets it avails, historical significances, and throw on my own philosophical slant, but I am not sure why I would want to do that. That is akin to pressing a religious view on an issue, and then eventually all things.

You see, I do take a tiny offence, not in a bad way...in a friendly discussion way , at the fact you suggest that maybe I am of a fixed one dimensional view, and presenting yourself as being of such a greater view based on that.

So remember now, 10 words or less. What is that video to you?

Cheeky little cunt.

[Youngblood]

lol sorry. I was still mad at you before our PMs.

[Andre]

Oh the vid /not your post .


Umm hang on thats one word..

Geometric dimensional ancient wisdom new age funk with crap music.

There 10, happy ?

[Andre]

I was joking in the first post !
I figure why put a on the end of every taughnt.
If someone cant laugh at themselves or me hey ; (Its for real then).

[Youngblood]

Yes, thank you. Now let's sing kumbaya and go fuk with Bilbo.

[Salty]

Seriously YB you are way too smart for someone of your age, I know 14 year old's who can't even construct a grammatically correct sentence. Let alone own Andre in a single post. Hell i'd hazard a guess that your smarter than a fair majority of people in some of my units.

[Andre]

He'll be here any minute why waste energy?

(that'll stop him posting )