Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Can anyone explain Rings rankings at 154?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default Can anyone explain Rings rankings at 154?

    The Ring Jr. Middleweight Ratings

    1-Cintron
    2-Angulo
    3-Cotto
    4-Rhodes
    5-Powell
    6-Foreman
    7-Martirosyan
    8-Dzinziruk
    9-Bundrage
    10-Alvarez

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1772
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone explain Rings rankings at 154?

    They still have Foreman as WBA champ. I think they take about 15 names and put them on a dartboard, and thats how they determine rankings. Thats why we need a boxing commission to standardize ranking system...but no we gotta keep it shady.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    833
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone explain Rings rankings at 154?

    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    They still have Foreman as WBA champ. I think they take about 15 names and put them on a dartboard, and thats how they determine rankings. Thats why we need a boxing commission to standardize ranking system...but no we gotta keep it shady.
    What's so "shady" about these rankings?? Cintron has a clear win over Angulo and the best resume at 154, Cotto has one fight at 154 and nobody rated below those 3 has any reason to be rated over these 3. Who cares if they list those asshole bandits and there BS titles incorrectly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1302
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone explain Rings rankings at 154?

    Quote Originally Posted by jdonaher1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    They still have Foreman as WBA champ. I think they take about 15 names and put them on a dartboard, and thats how they determine rankings. Thats why we need a boxing commission to standardize ranking system...but no we gotta keep it shady.
    What's so "shady" about these rankings?? Cintron has a clear win over Angulo and the best resume at 154, Cotto has one fight at 154 and nobody rated below those 3 has any reason to be rated over these 3. Who cares if they list those asshole bandits and there BS titles incorrectly.
    Dzinziruk should be ranked much higher. He's had wins as good as Cotto at 154 and been a champion for longer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone explain Rings rankings at 154?

    Dzinziruk should be higher, Powell and Rhodes MUCH lower

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Mosley moves upto no 6 in the rings P4P rankings
    By Boxerharvey in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-28-2009, 07:34 AM
  2. A Book Of Five Rings
    By Trainer Monkey in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-04-2008, 02:47 PM
  3. New Heavyweight breaks into THE RINGS top 10
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-10-2007, 02:38 AM
  4. THE ROUND IS NOT OVER UNTIL THE BELL RINGS
    By BoomBoom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-13-2006, 08:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing