Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1271
    Cool Clicks

    Default Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    The weight is going to be changed from 150lb to 154 and the weighin is going to be at an earlyer time. www.boxingscene.com

    Not sure how this can happen unless Hatton has agreed to the new changes.

    Hatton had very little chance in this fight anyway but it just got harder for him now.I see him been stopped earlyer in the fight now around the 4th round.

    WBC might aswell give Alvarez the title now

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3370
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    It will be funny to hear the moans,with people saying 154 is unfair and that it should be happening at a catchweight. You have to love irony.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3370
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    It definitely makes it even harder for Hatton. But to be fair 150 wasn't a big deal, as he's fought at 150/151 many times.

    But as people said of Manny, if he wants to fight for a world title he should fight the proper weight and not be a bitch.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Be interesting to see Canelo's weight on the night.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1271
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    I hate catchweight fights but if it has been agreed and you have been training for it at a catchweight it shouldnt be changed 4 days before the fight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1413
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    will it really give either boxer an advantage this close to the fight?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brack Vegas
    Posts
    1,399
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1116
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Agreed...if you can't fight at the weight you can't fight at that weights title....end of.....I mean what the hell is the point of fighting for a title if you can't do the weight...pointless and it makes a mockery of the whole Fighting for a Championship Belt....this has to stop now


    Job Biscuit (Pointless)!!!


    eh eh!!!
    It's nice to see you to see you nice

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1398
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Besides, he only really ever had 1% chance of winning anyway. Now it's like .5%.

    It's not worth complaining over
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Besides, he only really ever had 1% chance of winning anyway. Now it's like .5%.

    It's not worth complaining over
    He should turn up, grab the belt from ringside, walk up to Canelo, pat him on the back, hand him the strap, wave to the crowd and go back to the locker room.

    Seriously.
    Last edited by boxingbantz; 03-01-2011 at 02:05 PM.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1398
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Besides, he only really ever had 1% chance of winning anyway. Now it's like .5%.

    It's not worth complaining over
    He should turn up, grab the belt from ringside, walk up to Canelo, pat him on the back, hand him the strap, wave to the crowd and go back to the locker room.

    Seriously.
    Or accidentally knock the referee out, climb out the ring, grab a steel chair and hit Alvarez over the head with it. Wake the referee up and take the victory.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    what channel is it on?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Besides, he only really ever had 1% chance of winning anyway. Now it's like .5%.

    It's not worth complaining over
    He should turn up, grab the belt from ringside, walk up to Canelo, pat him on the back, hand him the strap, wave to the crowd and go back to the locker room.

    Seriously.
    Or accidentally knock the referee out, climb out the ring, grab a steel chair and hit Alvarez over the head with it. Wake the referee up and take the victory.
    All the while, Ricky Hatton has run out from the locker room, ran to the Alvarez corner before performing a Stone Cold stunner on Eddy Reynoso.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    what channel is it on?
    Sky Sports aren't showing it which is, literally, unbelievable seeing how they have shown all of his fights over the past 18 months. He then gets a world title shot and they don't show it.

    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 12:35 PM
  2. Matt Hatton: Floyd's camp called 3 times and is top name
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-12-2010, 04:15 AM
  3. Is Khan being stitched up?
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 09:23 AM
  4. Hatton v Castillo - The Drunken Weight by Weight.
    By superheavyrhun in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-23-2007, 01:25 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 10:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing