It was obviously the most money fight for bruno with tyson just coming out of prison and he obviously wanted to avenge his defeat...but couldnt he have just enjoyed the moment a bit more after the mccall win?
Bruno had alot of muscle and was very robotic and took alot of punishment..but how far do you think he would have went if he didnt fight tyson for the second time?


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes:
Reply With Quote



Bruno was very lucky to have been in a position to become a champion and rematch Tyson. He barely made it out of the last round against McCall; who had been asleep for most of their fight. Had he not fought Tyson he would've either had a couple of soft defences for less money, been stripped, or had to fight Holyfield or something. Truthfully though, it would have still been fun to see him take on say Tommy Morrisson or Ruddock, maybe and old Foreman. I think he'd have gotten KO'ed by all 3 but he also had a chance.
He was lucky that he had a chance to fight McCall for the world title when he did, and imo lucky that McCall didn't show much life in that fight until the last round or two. He was also in no way ahead against Witherspoon before being stopped if I remember. Had he done anything to earn the shot at McCall since losing to Lewis? He was obviously a big draw and that's great, but he would have never had a prayer of staying champion for long.
Bookmarks