I have been watching a lot of film on both of these guys and think a fight at 160 would have been fascinating. Hearns best was at 147, maybe 154, but he was still a pretty formidable middleweight who was tall, had good speed and still packed a decent punch. I go back and forth on if I would rather see Tommy fight Mike McAllum at 154, or Toney at 160, but right now my he Toney fight is more interesting/appealing.
I see Toney having the advantage in strength and chin, but losing out in the speed and power departments (though not by much because he had a good punch at 160 and Hearns wasn't the killer here that he was at the lighter weights). I see this fight going similar to Toney's fight vs Nunn where Tommy keeps moving behind the jab while Toney is his usual slick self and counters when possible and chips away at the body. I can see Toney winning by late stoppage or Tommy holding on for a close decision win after fading late.
Anyone see anything different or something I missed![]()
Bookmarks