Just wondering what everyone thinks about a possible Mosley/Hatton matchup. I believe the much stronger Mosley hurts Hatton bad enroute to late TKO.
Just wondering what everyone thinks about a possible Mosley/Hatton matchup. I believe the much stronger Mosley hurts Hatton bad enroute to late TKO.
this is quite obvious isn't..mosely has been at 154 for 4 out of 5 of his last five fights...hatton just had trouble with a 147pd boxer who could dream of boxing like mosely....
"Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones
Can't be too obvious because people keep talking about PBF and Mosley...hold Hatton to the same standard.
pbf v mosely...mosely wins via SD,UD,KO,TKO...either one of them would do...if they fought at 147...
hatton would lose to both of them...
"Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones
There's no way Hatton beats Mosley, Mosley still has good hand speed. IMO, I'm thinking 11th round KO.
Mosely wins within 8 rounds. He's about 5x as powerful as Collazo, as well as twice as fast.
I don't know about that. He might be twice as fast, but Collazo probably has as much power as Mosley at 147.Originally Posted by shza
No way does Mayweather lose to Mosley under 154 nowadays... he has diminished way too much(Mosley I mean). Putting that aside every problem say Mayweather will have against Hatton Mosley will not... Mosley is way stronger, hits way harder than Collazo, and is faster than Hatton by quite a bit even now... Hatton doens't have the footspeed or the skill to take advantage of the mistakes Mosley makes and would get killed.Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
Mosley is waaaay too big and skilled. I don't think Hatton could beat him. Mosley would melt PBF's face.
At light weight he was twice as fast as Collazo, but I think at 147 now he would be just slighly faster, but he definitely has more power than Collazo or anyone even Margarito that I see at 147.. or he would if he wanted it.Originally Posted by shza
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks