http://ringtalk.com/index.php?action...ments=1&id=860

THE PINOY” LOOKS TO START TROUBLE

San Francisco, CA-While it’s perfectly clear that Marco Antonio Barrera is a better fighter than Erik Morales (Barrera has a 2-1 advantage facing Morales), is it possible that Erik Morales has had a greater career than his Mexican rival? At 122, Morales has the edge on Barrera because of a victory over Barrera in their epic battle. Barrera’s fight against Kennedy McKinney was his only marquee win at 122. Barrera also lost twice to Junior Jones, who got knocked out by Morales. When both fighters moved up to featherweight, Barrera dominated the division, beating Prince Naseem Hamed and Erik Morales. However, Barrera was ran out the ring against Manny Pacquiao, while Morales moved up to 130lbs to unify the division.

THERE'S CERTAINLY ROOM FOR ARGUMENT

Even at featherweight, Morales posted a victory over Paulie Ayala, who hadn’t lost in years. After getting stopped by Pacquiao, Barrera became the first man to knock out Ayala, though Paulie looked like a shot fighter. Barrera is undefeated at 130lbs, beating Morales, convincingly, for a second time. However, Morales’ wins over Pacquiao, Carlos Hernandez, and Jesus Chavez were still greater than Barrera’s wins from Rocky Juarez and Robbie Peden. While I think Barrera beats Morales more times than not, "El Terrible’s" willingness to fight anyone at the peak of their careers (as evidenced by his decision to fight Pacquiao without a tune-up) may prove to be the greater boxing career when it’s all said and done.

Pooorly written article as there are too many fights and examples missing but I like the gist of it,I truly believe that EM has had a greater career than MAb,compare the resumes,what do you think?