Re: Why hasn't De La Hoya been stripped?

Originally Posted by
bilbo
Ok I've been wandering how come Oscar De La Hoya has been allowed to keep his light middleweight title when he hasn't made a single defense in almost a year.
How come the IBF didn't bust his ass for not making a mandatory?
They make every single other fighter agree to a meaningless mandatory defense but the Golden Boy has somehow been granted special privilege to not have to risk his belt before his megafight with Floyd.
Now I know all of you will say thats great, that he shouldn't have to face the likes of Grady Brewer or K9 Bundrage and I agree but we all know that common sense means nothing to the governing bodies!
The ONLY reason he hasn't been even asked if he would like to fight a mandatory or even make a defense is because he's a promoter and is in kahoots with all of the slugs who run boxing.
It's just another reason why I want him to get knocked our in May!
Any thoughts?
He was given one year to make a defense, for some reason (cash money) Mayweather is considered his mandatory.
the day that they fight will make 364 days, thus fulfilling his contract.
So to answer all of your questions about mandatories the default answer is cash.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks