We Should Be Able To See Who Is CC And SC

[ICB]

I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??

[LEGION]

I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??

It would be nice, huh? Alot less SC's would be given then I'm sure I'll get one now

[RP33]

I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??

Yeah, maybe with saying what thread it was from..
Cause if you get a random SC and you know who it's from, it would be nice to know what post they were sad clicking.

[BoxingGorilla]

I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??

Yeah, maybe with saying what thread it was from..
Cause if you get a random SC and you know who it's from, it would be nice to know what post they were sad clicking.

I wouldn't mind what post they were sad clicking, but I am not sure I would want to know who the clicker was. I am sure there has been an occasion or two where the person who issued me a SC was someone I admire. Those people should be able to repremand me without stepping from the shadows. Otherwise it could sour our friendship. Also, having an open-click policy could create a neverending shitstorm of sad-clicking or create a "perfect society" where no one is ever sad-clicked again. Neither of those scenarios appeal to me.

This is just my opinion and I understand the counterargument. Revenge? j/k

[ICB]

I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??

Yeah, maybe with saying what thread it was from..
Cause if you get a random SC and you know who it's from, it would be nice to know what post they were sad clicking.

I wouldn't mind what post they were sad clicking, but I am not sure I would want to know who the clicker was. I am sure there has been an occasion or two where the person who issued me a SC was someone I admire. Those people should be able to repremand me without stepping from the shadows. Otherwise it could sour our friendship. Also, having an open-click policy could create a neverending shitstorm of sad-clicking or create a "perfect society" where no one is ever sad-clicked again. Neither of those scenarios appeal to me.

This is just my opinion and I understand the counterargument. Revenge? j/k

They have that on the site i mentioned it shows you what post you was given bad karma.

[Dizaster]

You know what they could do..... If you've sad clicked someone 5 or 10 times, it should come up with a screen where you have to type out your reason for sad clicking the poor sod all the time.

So even if you don't know the exactly person who sad clicked you, you'll know it's been at least 5 or 10 times from a single person, and you can read their reason for it...

That would probably be fair as it still keeps people anonymous, but retards who wonder why the keep getting sad clicks won't have to wonder anymore..

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??

I couldnt agree more Ice.

I started a topic on the Hatton-Collazo fight (my delayed opinion on it) and i swear i got like 6 silent SC's in a day

Thats completely unjust IMO. And it wouldnt happen if posters were named and shamed for it.

















Mind you, on the flip-side, i suppose a quick stealthy click prevents mindless flamming.
Apperances flatter to decieve, ay? :P

[Steelie]

Treat 'em like battle scars, badges of honour, if you will

They're representative of times when you've stuck to your guns, faced down the opposition and they've been so frustrated at thier inabilty to counter your pugilistic brilliance, that they've been left no option but to go below the belt.

So, for my money, if you've not got enough SCs you aint getting stuck in

[brucelee]

Treat 'em like battle scars, badges of honour, if you will

They're representative of times when you've stuck to your guns, faced down the opposition and they've been so frustrated at thier inabilty to counter your pugilistic brilliance, that they've been left no option but to go below the belt.

So, for my money, if you've not got enough SCs you aint getting stuck in

hahaha. I like the idea that people who give sad clicks without reason are the ones who can't beat you in a debate and in their frustration they resort to sad clicking you. nice counter psychology Steelie.

[Tins06]

would be nice to see what you were SC 4 my ones seemed to have come from 1 post and i couldnt see anything wrong with it .....could get some revenge SC's in..

I think best thing it would be good to know what post got the sc...or cc..but the members to remain
unknown..

[ICB]

Treat 'em like battle scars, badges of honour, if you will

They're representative of times when you've stuck to your guns, faced down the opposition and they've been so frustrated at thier inabilty to counter your pugilistic brilliance, that they've been left no option but to go below the belt.

So, for my money, if you've not got enough SCs you aint getting stuck in

Yes but i think there should be a system like on the site i mentioned where it atleast shows you what post you was given SC or something like that ??

[LEGION]

Treat 'em like battle scars, badges of honour, if you will

They're representative of times when you've stuck to your guns, faced down the opposition and they've been so frustrated at thier inabilty to counter your pugilistic brilliance, that they've been left no option but to go below the belt.

So, for my money, if you've not got enough SCs you aint getting stuck in

Yes but i think there should be a system like on the site i mentioned where it atleast shows you what post you was given SC or something like that ??

Well it would be nice to know which battle I am receiving my scars from, and which war I am getting handed a badge of courage. I swear some people must just log on and then say:eenie-meeny-miny-mo and start randomly sad clicking; like Ted Bundy randomly picking people to butcher.
We seem to know when we get cc'd, but raarely are we told why we get sc'd. I could really care less about cc's or sc's, but their here and so let people know what we get them for. If someone isn't being abusive and rude to another poster, and is just giving their opinion on a subject, they shouldn't be sc'd for it. Blah blah blah.

[bzkfn]

Does it matter? The real posters on this forum know who the regulars are and know who's talking sense or through their arse. It's good when you start out, but I feel accepted enough anyway.

Plus, if someone disagrees with me, I take their sadclick as their way of hitting out that their opinion doesn't matter as much as mine.

I have given more CC's than I've received anyways. I tend to only sadclick the idiots who end up being kicked out anyway for trying to push someone's buttons. I also own up to mine anyway.

[ICB]

Does it matter? The real posters on this forum know who the regulars are and know who's talking sense or through their a***. It's good when you start out, but I feel accepted enough anyway.

Plus, if someone disagrees with me, I take their sadclick as their way of hitting out that their opinion doesn't matter as much as mine.

I have given more CC's than I've received anyways. I tend to only sadclick the idiots who end up being kicked out anyway for trying to push someone's buttons. I also own up to mine anyway.

I think it would be good idea just to atleast show what post you was given a sc or cc

[Steelie]

I like the fact that I can't see who it is, or where they're coming from...keeps me sharp