Re: Couple sue previous homeowners for not telling them the house was haunted
I read a case last semester about a court which confirmed that the old owner had to pay the new owner because he did not tell him his house was haunted.
To the court it was irrelevant whether the house was haunted or not, but the main focus was that the old owner had claimed it was haunted in a popular magazine. Then he sold the house without telling the new buyer. This adversely affected re-sale values. The court pretty much said that since it adversly affected re-sale values and that the old owner had been advertising the spirits previously, he should have, in good faith told the potential buyer.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Bookmarks