Good for you Mick. Good bet I say. Irish music reminded me of snatch..never trust a pikey.

.
I would have had money that way too.

Could of gone either way for a while and both guys had questions in their minds implanted by the other later on ,so they did what they could.
Best man won. Both are great men.
I must bore you technically now

.
If Forrest had fought nose to nose he would of got mashed.
I was egging Forrest to change feet in the last round, maybe lead with his right stronger and faster leg and right arm at a closer distance; from out front and closer to the mark he could of stopped Rampage via the knee.
He was lucky or good enough earlier that Rampages knee was sore enough that those front weaker slower left kicks still had him worried enough about moving into his prefered arm distance.
Rampage was thinking in two places at once because of that knee.
They were both slowing in the final round and knew a mistake could cost them everything.
I recon Forrest would have stopped him if his right leg landed on it from in a shorter distance and with weight comming down, he could land it down with a right lead jab or a cross from over Rampages left side ..Rampage would of been gutted cause Rampage couldnt turn to face him on that leg at that stage and Forrest would be away from Rampages arms. He could of even jumped into a double armed neck grab but landed his foot on his knee from the outside with full weight.
To do all that in ultimate perfection you would switch around his left lead arm as he came forward and then land on his knee with your shin so you cant miss from the outside of the knee, just as his left foot touched the ground. Its a break or dislocate and a take down.
He'll win next time too so long as he doesnt think I'll prove Im best at his own game.
Bookmarks