Re: Goldenboy's Manipulation of The Ring Magazine

Originally Posted by
lance Uppercut
I have am a very vocal supporter of The Ring, so it pains me to say this but there recent “Fall 2008” issue has crossed the line.
Just some background:
As you may recall, a stripper, Mila Dravnel had some incriminating photographs of Oscar De La Hoya from a crazy night in Philadelphia. De La Hoya claimed she was lying and that the pictures were fake. Thus Ms. Dravnel sued him for defamation. Eventually an undisclosed settlement was reached which included Ms. Dravnel signing a confidentiality agreement.
After the case was settled, De La Hoya sent out a press release claiming that “experts” had determined the photos to be fake causing Ms. Dravnel to drop her Defamation lawsuit. This press release was dishonest simply because it implies that actual unbiased experts had made this determination, when it was really just Oscar’s paid expert witnesses saying, well, what they were paid to say. The release also falsely implied that because of these “experts” that Ms. Dravnel had dropped her Defamation suit.” It completely ignores the financial terms of the settlement.
That being said, I don’t care that Oscar creates fake press releases because he is a public figure and needs to manipulate media coverage like any other high profile celebrity.
But here’s the Rub: The misleading press release is printed on page 12 in the Fall 2008 issue of The Ring Magazine.
I thought The Ring was supposed to be sacred and off limits to the Golden Boy: I guess not.
Well doesnt the ring magazine cover anything relating to boxing news? Is'nt that considered boxing news?
The key is Self-discipline.
Bookmarks