Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Diffrence in weights

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Diffrence in weights

    Can anyone explain to me why , say a 7pound diffrence in anything below heavyweight is a big deal , but in heavyweight you can have a 15 stone boxer v an 18 stone boxer

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1031
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Where do you stop if you bring in weights like super heavyweight and super super heavyweight.

    Any man over 200lbs is a heavyweight and thats the way it will always be but its a shame they cant.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    993
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Diffrence in weights

    Its a bit of a scam except with the little guys say 112 to 118 and is one of boxings dirty little secrets. Going from 8 divisions to 17 had a reverse effect then intended. Now you have people fighting one or two divisions south of their proper weight class because of the way weights are managed. I dont know if you remember Morales at 122 but he quite literally looked like grim death at the weigh in. Come fight night he was a full fledged lightweight. The 7 pound difference is more marketing today. I mean just look at all the belts and sanctioning fees.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    McAllen, Texas?
    Posts
    5,502
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1211
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Diffrence in weights

    Quote Originally Posted by Trecco bay View Post
    Can anyone explain to me why , say a 7pound diffrence in anything below heavyweight is a big deal , but in heavyweight you can have a 15 stone boxer v an 18 stone boxer
    I think the idea has to do with a percentage of body weight. Given that, the difference between 100 and 110 is more significant than the difference between 220 and 230. Also, i think that there is a belief that, above a certain weight, you should be able to hit hard enough to stop anybody. a lot of the old time guys thought that, above 165lbs, you could hit hard enough to ko anybody.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Does anyone think in the future with people getting bigger there would be a super heavyweight division, say 18st+?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I think there should have been a super heavy division, but it's too late now.

    In some of the smaller divisions, I think there is only 3lbs difference between them. That is simply a big shit.

    In the olden days fighters would wonder round at their fight weights most of the time. Now people boil down to way under their normal weight for the weigh in.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Diffrence in weights

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trecco bay View Post
    Can anyone explain to me why , say a 7pound diffrence in anything below heavyweight is a big deal , but in heavyweight you can have a 15 stone boxer v an 18 stone boxer
    I think the idea has to do with a percentage of body weight. Given that, the difference between 100 and 110 is more significant than the difference between 220 and 230. Also, i think that there is a belief that, above a certain weight, you should be able to hit hard enough to stop anybody. a lot of the old time guys thought that, above 165lbs, you could hit hard enough to ko anybody.
    True Grey, but what about the difference between 205 and 260, which is what the OP was eluding to.
    God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2077
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Diffrence in weights

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trecco bay View Post
    Can anyone explain to me why , say a 7pound diffrence in anything below heavyweight is a big deal , but in heavyweight you can have a 15 stone boxer v an 18 stone boxer
    I think the idea has to do with a percentage of body weight. Given that, the difference between 100 and 110 is more significant than the difference between 220 and 230. Also, i think that there is a belief that, above a certain weight, you should be able to hit hard enough to stop anybody. a lot of the old time guys thought that, above 165lbs, you could hit hard enough to ko anybody.
    You've hit the nail on the head there though... But it's not just about punching power.

    I spar guys with a few stone on me. At 185lbs non if them hit harder than me when we're both planting our feet and throwing our hardest.

    Their size and weight still gives a massive advantage. In lower weight classes you're usually weaker if you're taller. Not so at heavier weights.

    Lighter shots are heavier. Like I said, heavy shots not so much... But a guy with a weight advantage's jab is a lot heavier. They can swat yours away and walk through it easier, harder to control the ring.

    I agree, the difference betwern a light heavy's punch and a heavy's punch is smaller than a lightweight and a bantham... But I think there's less a difference in chin.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1393
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I noticed how much grappling was going on between Haye and Chisora and thinking that it must be so physically taxing just to have to resist the physical pressure a much bigger man is putting on to you.

    I've always been pro supercruiser weight... Would go a long way to bridge the gap right down as low a middleweight imo.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1436
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Diffrence in weights

    For me when you get above 215lbs you start losing a hell of a lot more athleticism than you do at any other weight. That is one reason Wlad is so hard to beat. He's very athletic and probably second only to Haye in terms of athleticism in the whole division, and he weighs around 240+.

    The thing is guys below HW tend to be in shape because they have to train properly because of they have to make weight. HW's now just seem to think Heavier is better. Well that is not the case. We have had a long list of poor HW's recently and 95% of the division are overweight. I'm not saying everyone should look like action man but coming in carrying fat will do you no favours.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Weights
    By Scrap in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-21-2008, 05:22 AM
  2. who is best at weights?
    By dezmundo1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 02:31 PM
  3. Does JT lift weights?
    By TheSilverBoy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-15-2006, 06:40 PM
  4. Punching with weights.?
    By gally in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 07-15-2006, 11:53 AM
  5. Arm/Leg weights
    By Heavy D in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-30-2005, 09:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing