Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    718
    Cool Clicks

    Default WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    They want to start a tournament to determine one champion in the weight divisions. Thoughts?
    Will post link when off work

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    989
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    https://twitter.com/WBCBoxing/status/481154852152963072

    The Wbc has been having these meetings every couple of years for a decade and yet they are the ones that continue to disallow most unification's and they cant even clean up having three champions for each div in their own house.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1988
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    That goes against everything they currently stand for. They don't even like their guy holding another belt. I'll believe it when I see it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    773
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    It's a shame when your knee jerk reaction to something like this is to ask your self what kind of BS are they trying to pull now.
    If I didn't know better, my reaction would be a positive one, cut the confusion, drum up some business, create some excitement, and give us someone to point to and say that's the man.
    I would hope something good would happen this time but like IamInuit said, it's probably just more lip service.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    949
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    In a pigs eye to many grease palms to oil, all them fees going out the window can't see them
    sharing sanctioning fees, not at all not one bit.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    718
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    https://twitter.com/WBCBoxing/status/481154852152963072

    The Wbc has been having these meetings every couple of years for a decade and yet they are the ones that continue to disallow most unification's and they cant even clean up having three champions for each div in their own house.
    the guy tweeting the WBC asked if the WBO was gonna be a part of it not and the WBC said" no but hopefully for the good of boxing they will join us in the future " seems the WBC WBA and IBF are the ones tryina make just one champ.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    England
    Posts
    616
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    If it happens it would be great for the sport, god knows we need a higher volume of competetive match ups. But like many people have said, I'll believe it when I see it.
    Excuse my spelling Hidden Content

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,613
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1012
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    I would suspect they are all Gung-Ho! until the subject of sanctioning fee come ups.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    623
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Would be great to see but there is too much to be done and won't really work unless they amalgamate together
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    677
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    The WBA said they were going to get rid of interim titles...we saw how that went...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    960
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Pro boxing was a more honest sport when the mob ran it during the 20s-50s than these clowns running it today, that's a pretty sad thought.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    989
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    The agenda:

    -Standarization of instant replay procedures and guidelines
    - Standardizing anti-doping testing protocols and substances
    - PED testing
    - General policies for world title unifications
    - Glove brands certification
    - Weigh-in monitoring (30 day, 7 day, day before and day of (to monitor gained weight)
    - Establishing programs based on nutrition to educate trainers and boxers
    - Standardizing division names
    - Reciprocity on suspensions
    - Joining forces on retired fighters’ aid and funds
    - Joint force to address AIBA’s monopolistic attempts.
    - Proposal of a tournament between champions to determine a sole world champion.

    How long is this meeting?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,971
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Most likely country-specific athletics boards, and most powerful the USA Athletics board and congress, has asked them to think very seriously about this flap doodle.

    Right now, having any or the other title is meaningless. Who gives a fuck about the WBO belt when you have the IBF and WBA? Who gives a fuck about the WBC when you have the IBF and WBO straps? See the picture? Throw in there the Ring title, and one can see how potential revenue is being lost on good fighters being relegated to non descript positions.

    When the belts are fragmented like this, then it should be automatic that one champ fights the other champ. AUTOMATIC.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    623
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Most likely country-specific athletics boards, and most powerful the USA Athletics board and congress, has asked them to think very seriously about this flap doodle.

    Right now, having any or the other title is meaningless. Who gives a fuck about the WBO belt when you have the IBF and WBA? Who gives a fuck about the WBC when you have the IBF and WBO straps? See the picture? Throw in there the Ring title, and one can see how potential revenue is being lost on good fighters being relegated to non descript positions.

    When the belts are fragmented like this, then it should be automatic that one champ fights the other champ. AUTOMATIC.
    Easier said than done with these money grabbing scums
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,975
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    I think the alphabet boy syndicates are slowly coming to the realization that they are on borrowed time and are largely viewed as irrelevant. We really don't "need" some tournament charade for the fans to tell us who is actually "the man" to beat in at least half the divisions as it is. I can't see any substantive move as far as the standardizations put forth without State commissions and boards conducting themselves in the same way. This is just letting the clowns run the operations of the circus. Hell, we have a couple States who have to actually 'borrow' commissions right now. The absolute first thing they need to do is encourage and abide by a unified champion and not roadblock it with obscure manufactured mandatories simply to collect sanctioning fees.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who do you agree with GB or TR?
    By DannyV297 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-06-2014, 09:06 PM
  2. Can we agree....
    By Pugilistic in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 01:28 PM
  3. Do you agree with this statements?
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 10-01-2008, 09:58 AM
  4. Experts Agree...
    By Deanrw in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 09:56 PM
  5. can we all agree?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 01:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing