Rematch clause.
Surely Wilder has to exercise it end of summer.
Same thing happens again or does Wilder go down a different route?
AJ and WILDER missed out on mega paydays but Fury ducked no one.
Rematch clause.
Surely Wilder has to exercise it end of summer.
Same thing happens again or does Wilder go down a different route?
AJ and WILDER missed out on mega paydays but Fury ducked no one.
I want to see it, but he needs to fix his ear and leg first. He has to come in 100% and smash Fury down and I think he has it in him.
His corner were awful.
No advice..nothing.
Wilder didnt look like he had anything after he got hit in the ear, be interesting to see what the injury is.
Let fury Joshua happen first then fury wants one more and out.
Wilders only chance is the right hand let's face it.
Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate
no need
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
One thing that might happen before a rematch:
Mark Breland is fired.
He may have made the 100% right call, am thinking his main trainer and wilder wont accept that.
I wouldnt be surprised if wilder has a long think about it and the rematch clause is not activated. He has enough attributes to win another version of the title
Are you seriously just a wind up merchant? Keeping threads going on what amounted to a no contest? As my starting thread over a week ago Wilder can't box, Fury can. Point now proven emphatically. 7 rounds, 3 judges 21 available, Wilder won 1! He is about as useful as Conor McPaddy against Floyd, another humiliation.
Happy to win my betting money, would be happy to see a trilogy, lets face it they've worked hard to hype it and good luck payday wise. Joshua is so slow he should avoid the pair of them.
The first fight was 8-4 to Fury with Fury knocked down twice. Almost knocked out. But yes, I think Fury was the better boxer.
This fight was one sided, but only properly one sided from the 3rd and there are question marks due to equilibrium issues. Now, I understand many will disagree, but that is my stance and I have never denied that Fury won it convincingly and I have said he deserves credit. He was the better boxer.
In saying that though, there is a rematch clause and if Wilder believes he was not 100%, then he has the right to accept less money and make the fight happen again. I just don't have an objection to that and applaud a man willing to face a challenge even if it could result in Wilder no longer being in the mix at the top. I have to respect him if he is willing to do that and I wouldn't rule out a 3rd or 4th knockdown from him either and Fury would be favorite.
Fury is the better boxer, no doubt about it, but boxing is not only about winning rounds as Wilder's career has shown.
Bigger man George, bigger punch!
Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
Hidden Content
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks