Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
erics44
thing is mate if groves wasnt british the british fight fans would see this a totally different way
the fight was stopped far too early after froch had took a massive beating
Im not daft enought to even believe there was no corruption involved, like i said in another thread, it even looked like foster was looking to jump in earlier, and with the judging and all that
but if it was an overseas fighter froch wouldnt even have to explain himself now and you would be cheering him on to his next challenge, as would I and every brit on this forum who are so vocal about the decision
Absolutely not. I'm not that kind of boxing fan. Ricky Burns lost to Raymundo Beltran. He lost and they fucking robbed Beltran of his World title and judging like that gives Boxing in the UK a bad name. Burns owes Beltran a rematch with neutral judges. There needs to be a level of fairness in this sport but what happened last Saturday was utter bullshit and everyone in the arena saw it. Froch even told Hearn in front of the crowd to get the rematch on and now he is back peddling quicker than Michael Jackson doing a moonwalk. If it was the other way round, Froch would have screamed bullshit and demanded Groves give him a rematch and I'd have been on here saying how Froch deserved his shot and how Groves owed it to him. He needs to settle the score and back up his word. There is no way he can go into his retirement saying he is satisfied with that TKO on his resume because in his heart of hearts, he knows the ending was bullshit.
i hear what you are saying and i agree with you but there is a major difference between those two fights
burns v beltram lasted its full duration and burns clearly lost but got the nod
Froch won his fight
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Bookmarks