??
??
If Bruce wants it, it would be another classic. Il vote yes to give Bruce the option.
091
Not bothered either way I just want someone to offer me a challenge, Donny get me a flyweight title shot will you man!
Ok Bilbo, you've been neglected long enough. Il go abouts getting ur shot.
091
Thanks bro, about time one of the big guns entered the ring.
Crazy hobbit rides into town![]()
No worries, Legion has been contacted and he should be set to defend in Jig time
091
Absolutely this needs to happen, Riddick Bowe VS Evander Holyfield style![]()
Ok 3 votes in favor of the rematch so far i'll let this run for a few more days because we need some more voters.
And if this does take place you can be one of the judges JT because i know your a fair judge but we need another 5.
You need 5 judges for a fight? Why that many, surely three is enough?Originally Posted by OwnedByPacstraightleft
I reckon 3 judges, you pick one, your opponent picks one and the referee or championship organiser selects the third.
To give everyone a chance when I fight, I won't select a judge, I'll just act as a judge myself that way I'm combining fighting and judging together thus doubling my workload and making it harder for myself, but I've always been generous like that![]()
Hitmandonny said we have 6 judges who judge the fight now Bilbo not 3 anymore.Originally Posted by Bilbo
Who elects them though? To my mind there's probably only 6 people on Saddo's who are mentally competent enough to act as a judge and obviously I'm one of them so that means that every time I'm fighting I'm guaranteed to have at least one mong judging the fight which puts me at a clear disadvantage.Originally Posted by OwnedByPacstraightleft
When you factor in that the referee will probably be one of the mentally able that means we are guaranteed 2 mong judges in every one of my fights:P
5 judges would be better but for convenience purpose, 3 judges will do. Debater1 will choose his judge and so is debater 2, third debater will be chosen by the President of MMWC. If possible these judges should PM each other and give the decision immediately, say 3-2, in favor of debater1. they should not try to convince each other to go for a debater. They don't need to explain to each other why a debater won as they might influence each other. After giving the decision, each of them needs to explain their decision in the same thread.
Ikariam
I believe MMWC should make its rules now while it is still in its start up period. I can volunteer to be one of the members of the committee on rules and regulations.
By the way,an existing champion and a contender should not be a judge in a debate in any weight division. The probability of implicit collusion is very high in there. For example, debater1 (with judge1 as a judge) is a also a judge in the fight of judge1. Of course, judge1 will favor debater1 or else he will get the ire of debater1 (who is a also a judge in the debate where judge1 is into).
Ikariam
Originally Posted by brucelee
I agree but this kind of contest will only have a few people interested in it so I guess we'll all have to double up judging and debating from time to time.
If you say now that you and Ice can never judge a fight, and neither JT Rock and Daxx after their contest, or me and Legion after ours etc pretty soon nobody will be qualifed to judge a contest.![]()
Let's look for 3 members who are not interested in this debates and appoint them as permanent judges. Example, BoxingGorilla.
I would be very busy this coming November and December and I'm currently not interested anymore with doing the rematch with ICB (at least for this year). I may engage in a debate next year but not sooner than February. For the meantime, if the debaters want it, I can volunteer to be one of the judges while we can't still find our 3 permanent judges.
Meaning, I will not be allowed to join fights until we find our 3 permanent judges. I'm willing coz I only love to read opinions and arguments but I hate writing my own.It takes time to write opinions that are based on facts.
Ikariam
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks