Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Some thing for the younger members

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1456
    Cool Clicks

    Default Some thing for the younger members

    The longest boxing match (with gloves) in history was 110 rounds long.

    It began around 9 p.m. on April 6, 1893 and ended the next day well after 4 a.m. Andy Bowen and Jack Burke fought for seven hours and 19 minutes in New Orleans, La. before the match was eventually deemed "no contest" when the fighters were too exhausted to continue. That decision was later changed to a "draw."

    Hidden Content Boot Hill, Where the Real Fights Are Fought.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2540
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    That is truly amazing. Have a CC for that, I heard of a fight going seventy odd rounds but 110? Fucking hell! Crazy!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Iv heard of a couple of fights before the introduction of the Marquess of Queensbury rules where fights stretched as far as 180. However as these were under the London Prize Rules and judges were much more "leniant," the sport was very different and less about technique and atrhleticism than it was about brute strength and endurance.
    091

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    I'm sure it was great back then but

    how boring would that be by today's standards?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
    I'm sure it was great back then but

    how boring would that be by today's standards?
    I dunno MMA is doing pretty well
    091

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
    I'm sure it was great back then but

    how boring would that be by today's standards?
    I dunno MMA is doing pretty well
    I meant fights lasting for 7 hours.

    And judging by MMA today where people get their fix from contests that last a couple of minutes.......
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
    I'm sure it was great back then but

    how boring would that be by today's standards?
    I dunno MMA is doing pretty well
    I meant fights lasting for 7 hours.

    And judging by MMA today where people get their fix from contests that last a couple of minutes.......
    About 5 of those seven hours would be mauling, lumbering against each other, holding and stumbling. Guys would try to grab breakks by pinning their opponent to the floor/side of the ring with their bodyweight and action would be slow for long periods of time....Sound familiar
    091

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    i remeber looking in the guiness world record i think it was the highest bt i dont know about seen hours i probaly had to take a sheit

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Back than rounds were not 3 minutes.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    350
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Why something for the younger fans, can you actually remember this happening?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny
    Iv heard of a couple of fights before the introduction of the Marquess of Queensbury rules where fights stretched as far as 180. However as these were under the London Prize Rules and judges were much more "leniant," the sport was very different and less about technique and atrhleticism than it was about brute strength and endurance.
    Were these bare knuckle?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    350
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by Myk_Myk
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny
    Iv heard of a couple of fights before the introduction of the Marquess of Queensbury rules where fights stretched as far as 180. However as these were under the London Prize Rules and judges were much more "leniant," the sport was very different and less about technique and atrhleticism than it was about brute strength and endurance.
    Were these bare knuckle?
    Yeh, and a round ended after a knockdown.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2842
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Could Ruiz have been the greatest ever at this time?
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1456
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by motorcitycobra
    Why something for the younger fans, can you actually remember this happening?
    And if I said Yes?

    From what I have read lately, some of the posters here are under 30, and some are barely out of their teens.. Hence the title of the tread...


    And No, I am not close to 120 years old.
    Hidden Content Boot Hill, Where the Real Fights Are Fought.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    729
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1140
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some thing for the younger members

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
    Back than rounds were not 3 minutes.
    It depends. As Donny stated some fights were under Queensbury rules - which is three minute rounds - and some fights were under London Prize rules where a round ended when one of the combatants hit the deck. A round could last 2 seconds and often did.

    It does appear that this contest was 3 minute rounds although most were probably grappling and wrasslin'

    If you think about it. There are 15 rounds per hour (3 minute rounds plus one rest). So seven hours in 105 rounds. Add in the extra 19 minutes and you have 110 rounds of "boxing"

    So, VD, as much as I admire your boxing knowledge, it appears you're wrong in this instance.

    http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive...CF&oref=slogin
    I'm never drinking again (I am a liar)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing