fights you scored differently to the judges

[HattonTheHammer]

Ok where do i start here...

Taylor-Hopkins 1 - I had B-Hops accuracy and power winning the fight by a good 2-3 rounds.

Pacquiao-Marquez 1&2 - Pac was the aggressor but marq always seemed to be able to get the better shots off and in particular in that 1st fight came back from a dire opener to win at least 7 of the last 11 rounds.

Barrera-Morales 1&2 - Barrera with that controversial last round knockdown deserved to scrape the decision and quite frankly got robbed. But in 2 it was a complete role reversal and morales was able to slow the pace of the fight down and dominate with his jab.

[Beanflicker]

Toney/Peter 1. I dont care what anyone said, Toney won that fight. I had it 8-4 for Toney, but 8-3-1 because one of the rounds I gave Peter he lost a point. Just another classic case of a slickster getting jobbed because the judges were scoring punches that were NOT landing.

Pernell/Chavez - I think this one is obvious, and one that EVERYONE with two eyes would have scored differently. I believe I had it 9-3 for Whitaker, and that was being generous to Chavez.

Norton/Ali 2- In my eyes, Ali NEVER did beat Norton in 3 fights. I had this 7-5 for Norton. He just had that style that gave Ali fits. He made Ali miss with the jab and slammed his own sledgehammer Jab into Ali's face all night. The only reason it was so close was because of Norton's tendancy to show big reactions to Ali's landed punches, either because of his mediocre chin or just impulse.

[Thread Stealer]

Tyrone Everett-Alfredo Escalera:

I wasn't paid off like the judges probably were, so the Cross Dresser Lover won in my view 10-4-1.

[Thread Stealer]

Ok where do i start here...

Taylor-Hopkins 1 - I had B-Hops accuracy and power winning the fight by a good 2-3 rounds.

I had it even. Leave it for good ole' Duane Ford to give the 12th round to Taylor, which won him the title. Ford is the same genius who had Moorer beating Foreman after nine, by one point.

Pacquiao-Marquez 1&2 - Pac was the aggressor but marq always seemed to be able to get the better shots off and in particular in that 1st fight came back from a dire opener to win at least 7 of the last 11 rounds.

I had Pacquiao winning the first, but Marquez winning the rematch 114-113.

Although the rematch had a couple close rounds in there, it was easier to score. The first match was tougher to score. From the 3rd to about the 7th, Marquez controlled most of it. However, the latter rounds were much closer and harder to score, which is why you often get a wide variation in scores.

[Master]

I had McCallum beat Toney in their first two fights.

[BoxingGorilla]

Pavlik - Taylor II for a start!

[ICB]

Pavlik - Taylor II for a start!

115-113 Pavlik i had it even after 10 rounds but Pavlik changed the fight around with a good body shot, and won the last two rounds clearly gving him the nod.

[BoxingGorilla]

[quote=ICB;540542]

Pavlik - Taylor II for a start!

115-113 Pavlik i had it even after 10 rounds but Pavlik changed the fight around with a good body shot, and won the last two rounds clearly gving him the nod.[/quote]


Oh, is that what happened...

[Thread Stealer]

I had McCallum beat Toney in their first two fights.

I had them splitting those 2, first Toney and then for Mike.

[Violent Demise]

Collazo-Hatton: How they gave that to Hatton is beyond me

[ICB]

Collazo-Hatton: How they gave that to Hatton is beyond me

I had Collazo edging it because i didn't like Hatton's sloppy work, i prefered Collazo's cleaner more effective punching, and except for the flash knockdown Collazo was never hurt or wobbled, where as Hatton was hurt and wobbled on numerous occassions including the infamous 12th round.

[Fenster]

Collazo-Hatton: How they gave that to Hatton is beyond me

You're not just the worst picker.. worst scorer too.