Re: Was the Peter Klitschko fight the most partisan of all time?

Originally Posted by
DaxxKahn

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
I couldn't believe Vitali's ring entrance, having 5 of probably the top 8 greatest heavyweights of all time, Foreman, Frasier, Lewis, Tyson and Holyfield all sending him personal messages and urging him to win the fight and then Michael Buffer announcing the reigning champ Sam Peter as being there to 'spoil the party' has there ever been a more partisan display of bias before a big fight in recent memory?
What is it with the champ emiritus and the respect he has throughout the boxing world?
It was as if he was the Messiah or King arthur having just drawn the sword from the stone I've never witnessed such a bizarre outbreak of love for a fighter before, let alone one who hadn't fought in 4 years.
What did everyone else make of it?
I was gutted for Sam Peter, I really wanted him to smash Klit's face in just to silence all the Vitali manlove that was going on, did anyone else get wound up by it?
I agree 100% it was a bunch of BS...Like he was the Messiah of the sport...Good analogy
The whole emiritus thing is a bunch of shit........
I would agree with you all except: after his showing and how shitty the supposed "current champion" was......it really was like he had always been a real title holder and took some time off.
I thought it was a bit theatrical......but Sam Peter's fat ass didn't even attempt to win that fight. Hell John Ruiz would have been a better fight.
All I am saying is this: If you are going to have all that bullshit, you better bring the goods. And it appeared like he brought them.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Bookmarks