Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 54

Thread: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    I know I'm not alone in this but I think the main board here has been taken over and ruined by fanyboys in the last year or so.

    More and more it seems the veteran posters are joining me in the Hidden boards rather than debate boxing and it's not difficult to see why.

    There are so many fanboys and knobs on the main board who turn every thread into a pissing contest about how one fighter is better than another or someone is crap and someone else is overatted.

    It's all so gay and unnessary.

    First off to those who say Calzaghe is shit, and to those who say Hopkins is shit, please BOTH are exceptional fighters who have EXCEPTIONAL resume's. Why feel the need to denigrate either of their acheivements?

    Hopkins wins over Oscar, Trinidad, Tarver, Winky and Pavlik are all great wins. The weight issues just show that Hopkins was smart enough to fight the fights on his terms but don't detract from the fact that he won them all. He's a truly elite fighter, one of the best ever and should be enjoyed whilst we still can.

    Calzaghe likewise has beaten every man he's ever faced, has wins over the British legend Chris Eubank, the two most dangerous 168 lb fighters in Kessler and Lacy and a win over a boxing legend in B Hop. In addition he goes on to fight Roy Jones in another huge resume defining fight. You can nitpick but you can nitpick about EVERY fighter who has ever fought.

    It's a fact that there is not a single example in the history of boxing where a fighter has beaten another great elite fighter in their prime that couldn't be explained away.

    Just have a go. Ali Ko'ing Liston, fight was fixed, Woolcott reffing didn't allow Liston to get up, it was a phantom punch that never landed etc.

    Ali beating Foreman, Foreman was poisoned, something put in his drinking water.

    Pacquaio Ko'ing Barrera, Barrera couldn;t concentrate because of all the metal head destractions leading up to the fight.

    Barrera beating Hamed, Hamed didn't train and thought he was going to win easily.

    Hopkins beating Tarver, Tarver had to lose over 50 lbs in weight after the Rocky film, you can excuse away every fight win ever in history











    Now the second thing that really annoys me is when people say someone is overatted and then if they lose make a post to highlight how they were right and they finally got justification for their hating

    What do people even mean when they say someone is overatted? It's like they are think these boxers are deliberate fraudsters, trying to deceive us out f our money and time to watch them under false pretexes.

    This is an important newsflash to fanboys. There is no such thing as an overtated fighter in the eyes of the casual fight fan.

    From the fan's point of view boxing is an entertainment sport and people watch the fighters that they are interested in. Their ability rarely comes into it.

    Pavlik was popular because he was exciting. He Ko'd the equally huge punching Miranda, and fought a fight of the year slugfest with Jermain Taylor wresting the title away from him in dramatic style. In addition he's a working class kid from an impoverished area and THAT'S why his story appeals. The average person doesn't do a boxrec search, study their opponents and examine punch stats from each fight to determine how good a fighter actually is before they decide they want to pay for a PPV they watch them because they are entertained by that fighter.

    All this overatted bullshit just pisses me off.

    I don't understand why people want someone to fail just so they can say 'I told you so' thinking it makes them look smart when in fact it's the easiest way in the world to make yourself sound like a complete and total dick hole.

    Ok I've had my rant over, I don't really enjoy posting on the boxing talk threads as nearly every thread is slagging off one fighter or another or announcing how 'I was right all along about a certain fighter so please come into this thread and acknowledge how clever I am' threads.


    That's why I'd rather stick to the hidden boards and talk about my bowel movements and organise fantasy based fancy dress parties for the Baggins Clan.

    Thankyou

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1393
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    I totally agree mate, since i have come back here, it has changed alot and is more and more reminding me of that pathetic excuse of a boxing forum Eastside, thats why i spend less time here then when i use to when i was about previously.

    Dont get me wrong the majoirty of people here are great posters like yourself and hundereds of others but there are to many idiots for my liking these days.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1752
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    fanboyism: Definition from definitions.com
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    very true i dont post over the week before or after a big fight, just due to there being pages and pages of nuthuggin going on, and you cant make a personal opinion without the newbs swarming you, something must be done!!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    I totally agree mate, since i have come back here, it has changed alot and is more and more reminding me of that pathetic excuse of a boxing forum Eastside, thats why i spend less time here then when i use to when i was about previously.

    Dont get me wrong the majoirty of people here are great posters like yourself and hundereds of others but there are to many idiots for my liking these days.

    You'll find that most of the veteran posters are still here we just post more and more in the hidden boards now. I'd rather swap True Blood theories with Boxing Gorilla and Diane than compare boxrec searches with an internet warrior these days

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1752
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    I totally agree mate, since i have come back here, it has changed alot and is more and more reminding me of that pathetic excuse of a boxing forum Eastside, thats why i spend less time here then when i use to when i was about previously.

    Dont get me wrong the majoirty of people here are great posters like yourself and hundereds of others but there are to many idiots for my liking these days.

    You'll find that most of the veteran posters are still here we just post more and more in the hidden boards now. I'd rather swap True Blood theories with Boxing Gorilla and Diane than compare boxrec searches with an internet warrior these days

    Sam's def a warewolf, Bilbs... Running throught the field naked in the morning?... Yeah.

    WTF was with the gloves and roling around in the dead chicks bed?.
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    I totally agree mate, since i have come back here, it has changed alot and is more and more reminding me of that pathetic excuse of a boxing forum Eastside, thats why i spend less time here then when i use to when i was about previously.

    Dont get me wrong the majoirty of people here are great posters like yourself and hundereds of others but there are to many idiots for my liking these days.

    You'll find that most of the veteran posters are still here we just post more and more in the hidden boards now. I'd rather swap True Blood theories with Boxing Gorilla and Diane than compare boxrec searches with an internet warrior these days

    Sam's def a warewolf, Bilbs... Running throught the field naked in the morning?... Yeah.

    WTF was with the gloves and roling around in the dead chicks bed?.

    Yeah he's definitely got some dark secret

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2810
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    Yah, this stuff makes it all kinda boring.

    I find that issues regarding weight get tossed around as excuses for losing far too often...

    "My guy should stay at junior welterweight, he's just not that good at welterweight" Never mind the fact that welterweight division is heavily populated with better fighters. Or how about "if they'd fought at junior welterweight, my hero would have won".

    "The weight drop from Heavyweight to Lightheavy obviously was affecting him" ... more than two years after the fact.

    So and So was a natural welterweight, so you can't say the guy who beat him at middleweight is better.

    The list goes on. If your favorite fighter is all that great, he should be able to deal with weight changes. Most of the great ones have.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I know I'm not alone in this but I think the main board here has been taken over and ruined by fanyboys in the last year or so.

    More and more it seems the veteran posters are joining me in the Hidden boards rather than debate boxing and it's not difficult to see why.

    There are so many fanboys and knobs on the main board who turn every thread into a pissing contest about how one fighter is better than another or someone is crap and someone else is overatted.

    It's all so gay and unnessary.

    First off to those who say Calzaghe is shit, and to those who say Hopkins is shit, please BOTH are exceptional fighters who have EXCEPTIONAL resume's. Why feel the need to denigrate either of their acheivements?

    Hopkins wins over Oscar, Trinidad, Tarver, Winky and Pavlik are all great wins. The weight issues just show that Hopkins was smart enough to fight the fights on his terms but don't detract from the fact that he won them all. He's a truly elite fighter, one of the best ever and should be enjoyed whilst we still can.

    Calzaghe likewise has beaten every man he's ever faced, has wins over the British legend Chris Eubank, the two most dangerous 168 lb fighters in Kessler and Lacy and a win over a boxing legend in B Hop. In addition he goes on to fight Roy Jones in another huge resume defining fight. You can nitpick but you can nitpick about EVERY fighter who has ever fought.

    It's a fact that there is not a single example in the history of boxing where a fighter has beaten another great elite fighter in their prime that couldn't be explained away.

    Just have a go. Ali Ko'ing Liston, fight was fixed, Woolcott reffing didn't allow Liston to get up, it was a phantom punch that never landed etc.

    Ali beating Foreman, Foreman was poisoned, something put in his drinking water.

    Pacquaio Ko'ing Barrera, Barrera couldn;t concentrate because of all the metal head destractions leading up to the fight.

    Barrera beating Hamed, Hamed didn't train and thought he was going to win easily.

    Hopkins beating Tarver, Tarver had to lose over 50 lbs in weight after the Rocky film, you can excuse away every fight win ever in history











    Now the second thing that really annoys me is when people say someone is overatted and then if they lose make a post to highlight how they were right and they finally got justification for their hating

    What do people even mean when they say someone is overatted? It's like they are think these boxers are deliberate fraudsters, trying to deceive us out f our money and time to watch them under false pretexes.

    This is an important newsflash to fanboys. There is no such thing as an overtated fighter in the eyes of the casual fight fan.

    From the fan's point of view boxing is an entertainment sport and people watch the fighters that they are interested in. Their ability rarely comes into it.

    Pavlik was popular because he was exciting. He Ko'd the equally huge punching Miranda, and fought a fight of the year slugfest with Jermain Taylor wresting the title away from him in dramatic style. In addition he's a working class kid from an impoverished area and THAT'S why his story appeals. The average person doesn't do a boxrec search, study their opponents and examine punch stats from each fight to determine how good a fighter actually is before they decide they want to pay for a PPV they watch them because they are entertained by that fighter.

    All this overatted bullshit just pisses me off.

    I don't understand why people want someone to fail just so they can say 'I told you so' thinking it makes them look smart when in fact it's the easiest way in the world to make yourself sound like a complete and total dick hole.

    Ok I've had my rant over, I don't really enjoy posting on the boxing talk threads as nearly every thread is slagging off one fighter or another or announcing how 'I was right all along about a certain fighter so please come into this thread and acknowledge how clever I am' threads.


    That's why I'd rather stick to the hidden boards and talk about my bowel movements and organise fantasy based fancy dress parties for the Baggins Clan.

    Thankyou
    Good Post.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,978
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1466
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does anybody else hate the fanboyism that dominates the boxing talk board?

    Don't forget to mention the anti-fanboyism, which is just another side of the same coin. It can be as good or worse depending on which side you are...
    Once in awhile, get outside in fresh air, take a deep breath & with a deep sigh, let out all the things that's bottled up inside you & be free, & you'll get a glimpse of nirvana.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is plain fanboyism causing people to nitpick?
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-03-2007, 05:50 AM
  2. Mabuza dominates Vargas
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-22-2006, 12:46 PM
  3. RAIYMKULOV DOMINATES CASAMAYOR
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-21-2006, 04:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing