Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Which fighter should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    Both fighters have critics based on who they did not fight but who should regret their legacy the most. I have carefully worded the question. Remember Jones was the more talented fighter.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    Not sure who Galzaghe is to be fair mate lol

  3. #3
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    IMO it's Calzaghe he had plenty of opportunities to move up in weight like Hopkins had plenty of opportunities to do so. You look at RJJ and sure there are some guys he should have and could have fought but RJJ still accomplished alot he won titles from middleweight to heavyweight (skipping over cruiserweight where IMO he would have been VERY successful). Joe like Hopkins stayed in one weight class for the majority of his career....and he RARELY left England to fight which further hurts him because not everyone wants to go to England to fight.


    RJJ has faaaaaar better talent on his record than does Calzaghe

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    From a legacy point of view it's Calzaghe who definitely has more to prove, at least in the eyes of American's

    Jones Jr has already proven himself over and over, in his prime he was nigh on unbeatable.

    Joe has had an outstanding career but only in the last couple years is he finally fighting the big names.

    If he were to lose this certainly there will hundreds of haters on here who will post 'I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO!!!!! and FINALLY I'M VINDICATED!!!!' type crap.

    Whilst the boxing world at large will still respect Joe's acomplishments he really needs this win to put himself amongst the greats.

    And I really think with a win here he will be close to achieving that.

    Whilst I don't think Jones is the fighter he was he's no less the fighter than Mike Tyson was when Lennox Lewis got to him, or maybe even Barrera when Juan Manuel Marquez got to him.

    It's still a huge name on Joe's resume no matter what the haters, naysayers and negativity spinners will say.

    If he wins he will have beaten hands down the two most outstanding American fighters of this generation in these weight classes.

    He needs this win, he really needs this win.

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    It's still a huge name on Joe's resume no matter what the haters, naysayers and negativity spinners will say.

    If he wins he will have beaten hands down the two most outstanding American fighters of this generation in these weight classes.

    He needs this win, he really needs this win.
    Having Jones on his resume is about like him having Eubank on his record.

    That being said Joe does NEED to win because if he does lose espicially to this version of Roy Jones Jr. he will be cast aside as nothing but hype and a beater of bums, a step above Svenn Ottke!

    Joe's legacy won't truly be written until guys like Lacy and Kessler get further in their careers.

    I would still like to see Jermain Taylor vs Joe Calzaghe...I always thought JT would have a better shot at Calzaghe than Pavlik especially after the Kessler fight

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    It's still a huge name on Joe's resume no matter what the haters, naysayers and negativity spinners will say.

    If he wins he will have beaten hands down the two most outstanding American fighters of this generation in these weight classes.

    He needs this win, he really needs this win.
    Having Jones on his resume is about like him having Eubank on his record.

    That being said Joe does NEED to win because if he does lose espicially to this version of Roy Jones Jr. he will be cast aside as nothing but hype and a beater of bums, a step above Svenn Ottke!

    Joe's legacy won't truly be written until guys like Lacy and Kessler get further in their careers.

    I would still like to see Jermain Taylor vs Joe Calzaghe...I always thought JT would have a better shot at Calzaghe than Pavlik especially after the Kessler fight
    Having Jones on his name will be HUGE. Even if people say he is done it's still the biggest name.

    Just consider this.

    Who is the biggest name on Leon Spinks record?

    How about Trevor Berbick?

    Danny Williams?

    Kevin McBride?

    James Buster Douglas?

    These fighters fought Ali and Tyson well past their past (except Douglas) yet it's still what they are famous for.

    Glen Johnson and Tarver both crept into the Ring top 10 p4p's when they beat Jones.

    People hate Tarver because he's famous only for beating Jones but that's because it's a HUGE win, no matter what the circumstances.

    A win over Jones, no matter what his current ability is WAY above a win over Eubank on the world stage.

    Calzaghe will always be remembered for beating Hopkins and Jones above any other fighters if he pulls it off.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2582
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who should regret the weakness in their legacy the most?

    i say calzaghe. roy has done more with his career to be honest he moved up in weight fought the best in each class except for HW but who cares he still won a strap and thats pretty impressive for a guy that started his career in JMW. but calzaghe stayed and dominated in one division basically his whole career. so it will be like this Calzaghe will be remembered KINDA like hagler is which is a great fighter who just dominated some good up and comers and stayed undefeated. but roy will be rememberd like himself he was the p4p best for a while moved up in weight to fight better competition and was the most exciting fighter to watch for this generation.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. PBFs Biggest Weakness..
    By BoomBoom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 09:12 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-15-2008, 09:48 AM
  3. Which PPV's did you regret buying?
    By rvk1331 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-22-2007, 07:37 AM
  4. Kessler: Beyer's weakness is me
    By jangeorg in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-03-2006, 08:44 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing