Ok fight fans, i'm new to this board and ive got a silly question to ask.
Out of the 4 major organisations, What title is considered the best to hold, WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO? When i say best, i mean the most prestigious.
Cheers
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Every corner needs one
Array
This may be a daft question.....
Ok fight fans, i'm new to this board and ive got a silly question to ask.
Out of the 4 major organisations, What title is considered the best to hold, WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO? When i say best, i mean the most prestigious.
Cheers
...bigger than Jesus
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
Tradionally they rank like thisOriginally Posted by The Cutsman
Ok fight fans, i'm new to this board and ive got a silly question to ask.
Out of the 4 major organisations, What title is considered the best to hold, WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO? When i say best, i mean the most prestigious.
Cheers
WBC
WBA
IBF
WBO
but to be honest the way the game is today none of thenm necessarily have much credit.
Weclome to the site mate
VIOLENT DARK SIDE
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
I would say the WBC
1.WBC
2.WBA
3.IBF
4.WBO
But a lot of people put stock in The Ring Magazine belt now days.
Every corner needs one
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
Cheers for that mate.
It's a bit confusing with so many titles around!
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
The Ring is clearly the most prestigious and difficult to attain. However, going by just alphabet gangs:
WBC (they have the most Ring Champions out of any alphabet gang)
IBF (IBF only get second place because of the WBA's decline)
WBA (The WBA should be second; however, they have severely watered down their titles ever since instituting 3 titles per weight class: super, regular, interim.)
WBO (Although WBO is the lowest of the alphabet gangs it is the quickest rising. In the 1990's HBO would not even mention it, even when it was being defended in their fight. Since the,n the WBO has gained acceptance as a 4th alphabet title.
Forum Champ
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
Yeah, I've heard more than one boxer say the WBC belt.
Besides, who doesn't want a green belt?
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
None of the alphabets are any better than the other. The fighter makes the belt.
Ive heard boxers say the WBC is the "top" one BUT that's when they either win it, or are about to fight for it
I treat them as guides. If someone wins a belt they have generally proven to be world class. At the very least makes them worthy of a unification match with the top man.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Old Guard
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
WBC belt out of them four
The RING belt is what really matters to fight fans though
Last edited by Kel; 10-29-2008 at 11:50 AM.
Dazed and Confused
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
yea its wbc, wba, ibf, then wbo. and i dont see why the ring belt should matter so much.
Una mas semana
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
The ring belt has the most definitive system. The alphabets can remove a title with no reason, the ring title must be won in the ring literally.yea its wbc, wba, ibf, then wbo. and i dont see why the ring belt should matter so much.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Old Guard
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
What he saidThe ring belt has the most definitive system. The alphabets can remove a title with no reason, the ring title must be won in the ring literally.yea its wbc, wba, ibf, then wbo. and i dont see why the ring belt should matter so much.You have to BEAT the champ to BE the champ.
NZ Golden Boy
Array
Re: This may be a daft question.....
The Ring championship.
Its the only belt won & lost in the ring!!!
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks