Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    mossley
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    If that punch had not landed?
    Hatton went down twice in first rd, JMM went down 3 times and came back.
    Please consider the following:

    Hatton was landing on Paq, not an amazing amount, but he landed more in 2 rds than Oscar De La Hoya did in the entire fight. Paq has said that Hattons puches were hurtful.

    Although Hatton went down in rd 1 twice, he had not gone down in rd 2, in my view he clearly was having more success in rd 2 than rd 1, although Paq clearly took the round.

    Consider the fight was of an incredible pace which could not be sustained, I believe if Hatton had survived another 2 rounds, Paq would have slowed down giving Hatton a chance in the later rounds.

    I am not saying Hatton would have won, all I am asking is would he have had a chance later on if Paq slowed down?

    The fight was an incredible 7 minutes worth of action and to me showed me why no other sport could match it when at its best.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1348
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    Quote Originally Posted by richard (mossley) View Post
    If that punch had not landed?
    Hatton went down twice in first rd, JMM went down 3 times and came back.
    Please consider the following:

    Hatton was landing on Paq, not an amazing amount, but he landed more in 2 rds than Oscar De La Hoya did in the entire fight. Paq has said that Hattons puches were hurtful.

    Although Hatton went down in rd 1 twice, he had not gone down in rd 2, in my view he clearly was having more success in rd 2 than rd 1, although Paq clearly took the round.

    Consider the fight was of an incredible pace which could not be sustained, I believe if Hatton had survived another 2 rounds, Paq would have slowed down giving Hatton a chance in the later rounds.

    I am not saying Hatton would have won, all I am asking is would he have had a chance later on if Paq slowed down?

    The fight was an incredible 7 minutes worth of action and to me showed me why no other sport could match it when at its best.
    and in the fantasy land bunnies also eat sunshine a shit rainbows......

    ..i agree Hatton recovered well after the first and did pressure Manny a bit better than in the 1st, but he was still just as careless and was losing the round clearly even without the KO ending, i don't see it changing one bit seeing how Pacquiao has great stamina and doesn't tire that much in the later rounds, honestly if Manny hadn't Ko'd Hatton there he would have just cut him up or he would have won by TKO due to swelling, Hatton's eyes were already puffy by the end of the first

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    I don't think so, no not at all. Edit: technically anything could happen but its not likely.

    Everything Pac was landing was effecting Ricky, and while JMM may have survived he's just a much tougher matchup for Manny. The way Ricky was coming in, head up, hands only half up, leading with left hooks Manny could counter easily makes me think Manny would have just landed too much and Hatton would have eventually not been able to take it.

    Also Manny's in great shape, it would take a lot for him to wilt.
    Last edited by OumaFan; 05-04-2009 at 05:10 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    21,428
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2225
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    yeah he did hurt Pac in the second but the trouble is Pac dosn't slow down.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1348
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saddo View Post
    yeah he did hurt Pac in the second but the trouble is Pac dosn't slow down.
    exactly, all i think that Ricky hurting Pac proved is that Cotto and Mosley at 147 are too much for him, IMO they hit a hell of alot harder, and are far more skilled

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    Did he really hurt Manny much in that round, I didn't notice it live, maybe Manny mentioned it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1348
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Did he really hurt Manny much in that round, I didn't notice it live, maybe Manny mentioned it.
    he didn't rock the hell out of him, but Manny wobbled a bit, and said himself that Hatton hit VERY hard, both Cotto and Mosley hit harder than Hatton

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2607
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    From what I saw, when Hatton hit Manny with the right hand with 2:36 left in the second, he was also standing on Manny's foot. Manny pulled back and semi tripped, but when right back in for more.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    Pac could have sliced and diced Hatton's face if the fight went the distance. Hatton fans should be grateful. Pac gave him the quick and merciful KO.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1507
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hypothetically: Could Hatton Have Beat Paq?

    Quote Originally Posted by richard (mossley) View Post
    If that punch had not landed?
    Hatton went down twice in first rd, JMM went down 3 times and came back.
    Please consider the following:

    Hatton was landing on Paq, not an amazing amount, but he landed more in 2 rds than Oscar De La Hoya did in the entire fight. Paq has said that Hattons puches were hurtful.

    Although Hatton went down in rd 1 twice, he had not gone down in rd 2, in my view he clearly was having more success in rd 2 than rd 1, although Paq clearly took the round.

    Consider the fight was of an incredible pace which could not be sustained, I believe if Hatton had survived another 2 rounds, Paq would have slowed down giving Hatton a chance in the later rounds.

    I am not saying Hatton would have won, all I am asking is would he have had a chance later on if Paq slowed down?

    The fight was an incredible 7 minutes worth of action and to me showed me why no other sport could match it when at its best.
    Answer: no way, he was getting badly out boxed. People don't realize that even though he was wide open for the right hook than Hatton's hand placement allowed him to see the left cross which Cotto wouldn't see coming, and if he changed his hand placement he would have been nailed by that left hand, and if he continued the same way Pacquiao would have picked him apart wiht the right hook, but you already saw Pacman almost land that same punch twice before he did, and it was only a matter of time, he had Hatton's timing down from the get go, and it was easy to see that it was going to end early.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:07 AM
  2. Would Hatton be able to beat any of the top WW?
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 11:06 AM
  3. who could beat the hatton that beat tszyu
    By paddy448 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 06-03-2007, 07:56 PM
  4. Who can beat Hatton at 140?
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-26-2006, 03:20 PM
  5. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-29-2006, 08:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing