Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

Voters
4. This poll is closed
  • Yes, he should remain rated

    4 100.00%
  • No, he should be moved to the pool

    0 0%
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2303
    Cool Clicks

    Default Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?



    Should Bernard Hopkins (currently #1) remain rated or be removed to the pool, as his last fight was on the 18th of October ’08?

    He does have a fight scheduled for December but would have been out of the ring for nearly 14 months by that time.
    Bernard Hopkins
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    943
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

    I say keep him rated.. if he didn't announce any fights by the end of the year I would of suggested to remove him.. but luckily for him he's announced a fight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4417
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

    Man I'm really torn here guys, gonna have to think about it over night.
    Yes he's fighting, BUT he's fighting a guy who has made a career of losing to older fighters. I respect that it's for charity though. And of course the elephant in the room is Dawson/Johnson II which would be for the championship is really tempting.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2303
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Man I'm really torn here guys, gonna have to think about it over night.
    Yes he's fighting, BUT he's fighting a guy who has made a career of losing to older fighters. I respect that it's for charity though. And of course the elephant in the room is Dawson/Johnson II which would be for the championship is really tempting.
    I'm with you, I feel he deserves to be rated but the inactivity is concerning. I feel he should be demoted at the beginning of November to open the way for Dawson/ Johnson 2
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4417
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Man I'm really torn here guys, gonna have to think about it over night.
    Yes he's fighting, BUT he's fighting a guy who has made a career of losing to older fighters. I respect that it's for charity though. And of course the elephant in the room is Dawson/Johnson II which would be for the championship is really tempting.
    I'm with you, I feel he deserves to be rated but the inactivity is concerning. I feel he should be demoted at the beginning of November to open the way for Dawson/ Johnson 2
    That sounds reasonable, I can get behind that. I'm think worse case scenario Ornelas (sp.?) beats Hopkins by some freak accident and then look who's number one. The winner of Dawson/Johnson justifiably should be our champ, because Hopkins fighting once every 14 months doesn't cut it for me.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1065
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

    The pool is closed and I am a bit late to vote but I'll give my 2 cents on that one: YEah, based on his performances and on the quality of the opposition he's consistently having (well, maybe not for his bout in december but the old man deserves a gift, too). I also consider his age and the fact that being on the very last miles of his career, he tries with all his might to get the best options available to top the whole.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2303
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bernard Hopkins remain rated?

    Bernard Hopkins remains rated by a vote of 4 - 0
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Bernard Hopkins
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 08:14 PM
  2. Q&A: Bernard Hopkins!
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-29-2006, 01:56 AM
  3. bernard hopkins
    By NUCLEAR BULL in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 04:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing