Just curious about what the general consensus is in regards to whom was better. My cousins argue over this one constantly as many feel that Pernell had the ability to win an easy decision while others say Duran wins easily.
Just curious about what the general consensus is in regards to whom was better. My cousins argue over this one constantly as many feel that Pernell had the ability to win an easy decision while others say Duran wins easily.
Sweet pea would make Duran look like chavez...it would pr should be a victory for Sweet pea but they'll rob him and give Duran a draw.
"Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones
I'm a huge Chavez fan, but I think Duran was technically a more complete fighter.
I just watched Duran v Leonard 1 and his inside work was marvellous.
091
at lightweight, roberto duran would beat pernell whitaker going away. it would definitely go the distance cause whitaker would run all night. there is no way whitaker would stand and trade with duran and would just fight defensively. i don't think it would be a very attractive fight cause whilst duran would want to make it a fight, whitaker would be too cautious and make it a track meet. duran by UD12 by scores of 117-111.
That's the thing, I see that scenario as a possibility but I picture Duran knocking him out late via cutting off the ring effectively and a great body attack or Sweet Pea being on his game and popping Duran and moving all night en route to an easy decision, making him look foolish in the process.
The last time we saw Roberto Duran at his peak was the first Leonard fight, he had been fighting for 12 years before that. He was the most dominate Lightweight in history, i like Pernell Whitaker, i just don't see him beating Roberto Duran at Lightweight.
You're a new poster on this board, so you will soon see that majority of the posters on here see Duran as some sort of lightweight God...I on the other hand is considered a heretic on the guy...I think Sweet pea, and floyd would both beat him at LW and Mosley would absolutely crush him...
"Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones
I would personally go for Swea Pea , i think he would win a UD 116-112 , but of course Duran is a wonderful fighter , its a difficult one to pick but i go for Whitaker.
It wouldn't be an easy fight for either guy. Thats just plain silly. In all reality its most likely 50/50. However, I'd give just an ever so slight edge to Duran due to his power and relentlessness. With that said, Pernell is one of my favorite fighters of all time. I think Roberto looks silly early due to Peas speed, but the lack of power from Whitaker wouldn't be enough to keep Duran off of him in the later rounds.
Pernell Whitaker by UD he beat very good pressure fighters like. Azumah Nelson, Jose Luis Ramirez, Julio Cesar Chavez, Jorge Paez, ETC.
And for the person who said Pernell Whitaker would make it a track meet, have you seen Pernell Whitaker at Lightweight ? he could easily throw 100 punches a round and would often stand his ground making you miss and making you pay.
Roberto Duran did beat some underrated boxers at Lightweight like Vilomar Fernandez, but i don't think he ever really beat a great fighter at Lightweight. Esteban De Jesus was good but not great. Ken Buchanan is the only one but even that had some controversy.
Roberto Duran had very good defense for a pressure fighter, a steady body and head attack. Aswell as cutting off the ring good, but he could be outboxed.
And i think Pernell Whitaker with his great angles, footwork, speed, elusiveness, would be able to win a close UD.
And remember Pernell Whitaker had underrated toughness aswell, he got his jaw broke in the 2nd round while past his prime vs Felix Trinidad. And he still made it too the 12th round.
There's a reason Pernell Whitaker has never legitmately been stopped, and thats because aswell as a great defense. He had underrated toughness.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks