Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Which would you rather have/Which is best for the sport (no matter the weight class)?

Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    Given the choice between the two which would you (as a fan of the game) rather see? A great champion or a highly competitive division? Which is best for the sport and which do you enjoy the best? Is it better to have a Joe Louis with a "bum of the month club" or a Mike Tyson who is unchallenged during his prime years or is it better to have Ali, Frazier, and Foreman or Haggler, Leonard, Duran, and Hearns? Is it better to have an era with just 1 bright star or several equally talented fighters none of them really outshining the other?


    I haven't even asked myself this question until right now and I am not sure what my answer is...and does the question even matter at this point?
    Last edited by El Kabong; 11-09-2010 at 02:56 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2898
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    Well they aren't mutually exclusive. Just because Ali, Frazier and Foreman lost fights doesn't mean they weren't all great champions. Neither are great for boxing without the other. Competitive divisions ideally produce great champions who have had their mettle tested.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    A competitive division like the HW scene in the '70s and '90s, boxing was at an all time high in popularity and with so many quality fighters all around boxing. Having 1 dominant champ for a division isn't good for boxing overall, unless that dominant champ was an exciting HW one like Dempsey, Louis, Marciano, Ali, Tyson.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2164
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    I think it's best for boxing and best for the fighters themselves when it's a very competitive division... Fighters who rise to the top even if they have a couple of losses along the way, really get the credit they deserve in a strong division...
    A really great champ in a relatively weak division always has a question mark over their head to some extent... ie. Calzaghe with like 40 wins 0 losses still a lot of people doubted him... Floyd even still doesn't get paid the respect that he deserves from a lot of people because they feel he dominated a division that wasn't to competitive...

    But then you have the paradox of the question, where you have a really competitive division, but a great champ who rises above and makes all opposition look completely ordinary.... You can't say that boxing would be better off without these rare individuals just so the rest of the division seems elite...

    But yeah, I would definitely say a competitive division is better... And if a champ makes all opposition look in a lower class, they just have to move up a division until they are with equal competition...
    ~ He thinks he's a Tornado,,,... F'ckn real Tornado is comin'...! ~Hidden Content

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Well they aren't mutually exclusive. Just because Ali, Frazier and Foreman lost fights doesn't mean they weren't all great champions. Neither are great for boxing without the other. Competitive divisions ideally produce great champions who have had their mettle tested.
    True but I would say that it's out of the ordinary for an era to have both.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    21,428
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2219
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    with out a doubt a competitive division all day and twice on sundays

    they produce great fights and usually a great champion as well in the end

    for me if a fighter is that good he makes all the rest seem shit it can wear alittle thin over time if he never gets challanged or avoids any.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2164
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saddo View Post
    with out a doubt a competitive division all day and twice on sundays

    they produce great fights and usually a great champion as well in the end

    for me if a fighter is that good he makes all the rest seem shit it can wear alittle thin over time if he never gets challanged or avoids any.
    It's a real shame for Heavyweights in those situations because they can do nothing about it.. But for all other divisions, the standouts can just move up.. Which is a whole other level of exciting.. And I think the real greats over time are the ones who have not just transcended a competitive division, but moved up to constantly look for the greatest challenge..
    For me, that is greater than someone just ruling a single division for so many years.. Even an elite division..
    ~ He thinks he's a Tornado,,,... F'ckn real Tornado is comin'...! ~Hidden Content

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,153
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Which would you rather have: A Great Champion or a Competitive Division?

    competitive division but at same time I like there being an exciting champion with an aura of invincibility. Not seen that one too often eg Tyson, SRR , Joe Louis, Frank Bruno etc

    I think the latter brings more neutrals as fans too - bit like Taylor at darts
    Last edited by Mark TKO; 11-09-2010 at 02:29 PM.
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Another great fight in the Welterweight division
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-15-2010, 01:14 AM
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-31-2009, 10:03 PM
  3. David Haye next great heavyweight champion
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-10-2008, 06:41 PM
  4. Taylor: Bad champion or great opposition
    By The Rookie Fan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-02-2007, 09:15 PM
  5. The next great heavyweight champion
    By toneytoneytoney in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-13-2006, 12:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing