Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1274
    Cool Clicks

    Default Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    The weight is going to be changed from 150lb to 154 and the weighin is going to be at an earlyer time. www.boxingscene.com

    Not sure how this can happen unless Hatton has agreed to the new changes.

    Hatton had very little chance in this fight anyway but it just got harder for him now.I see him been stopped earlyer in the fight now around the 4th round.

    WBC might aswell give Alvarez the title now

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    It will be funny to hear the moans,with people saying 154 is unfair and that it should be happening at a catchweight. You have to love irony.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    It definitely makes it even harder for Hatton. But to be fair 150 wasn't a big deal, as he's fought at 150/151 many times.

    But as people said of Manny, if he wants to fight for a world title he should fight the proper weight and not be a bitch.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    915
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Be interesting to see Canelo's weight on the night.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1274
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    I hate catchweight fights but if it has been agreed and you have been training for it at a catchweight it shouldnt be changed 4 days before the fight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    915
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    will it really give either boxer an advantage this close to the fight?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brack Vegas
    Posts
    1,399
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1119
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Agreed...if you can't fight at the weight you can't fight at that weights title....end of.....I mean what the hell is the point of fighting for a title if you can't do the weight...pointless and it makes a mockery of the whole Fighting for a Championship Belt....this has to stop now


    Job Biscuit (Pointless)!!!


    eh eh!!!
    It's nice to see you to see you nice

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1401
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    Spot on.
    Besides, he only really ever had 1% chance of winning anyway. Now it's like .5%.

    It's not worth complaining over
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Matt Hatton been stitched up, weight been changed?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm sticking to my guns o this. If it's for the WBC 154 title, the contracted weight should be 154. They signed for a catchweight when the belt wasn't on the line. Now it is, so if you want to be a world champion at light-middleweight, then the stipulated weight should be just that!
    I would have said that doesn't make any rational sense. But for the WBC, there has to be a contract because they removed the weigh-in protections from their rules. Before there is no need to have a "contracted" weight, as long as they are fighting up to the division weight limit. The purpose of a contracted weight is provide leverage over the advantaged larger fighter. That application hasn't changed.

    The boxing commissions already have rules in place to protect the fighters at the weight class limit but the 24-30 hour weigh-in rules will hopefully start to change. Massachusetts State Athletic Commission is leading the way in it's young life. They approved double weigh-ins for the MMA last year temporarily and will move to introduce legislation make it permanent. The cap is set at 1.0625 for the second weigh-in that a fighter is allowed to gain. Example, a fighter contracted to fight at 135 pounds can’t come in higher than 143.4375 pounds on fight night. California started in this direction back in 2005 after the Gatti vs Gamache fight, but dropped into the background in order to let other states take the lead in providing evidence that the current unfair practice is unsafe. There is really only two states that can look into this from a medical perspective and that is Texas and Nevada. I wouldn't expect anything unless the esteemed Senator McCain gets his Boxing Act through for a National Boxing Commission.

    Personally I don't "think" this the cap makes boxing any safer and "feel" it's actually counter productive toward safety. In the spirit of fairness and the out of respect for safety they should have same day weigh-ins and remove the temptation for "qualifying" to fight at the lower classes to gain an advantage.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 12:35 PM
  2. Matt Hatton: Floyd's camp called 3 times and is top name
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-12-2010, 04:15 AM
  3. Is Khan being stitched up?
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 09:23 AM
  4. Hatton v Castillo - The Drunken Weight by Weight.
    By superheavyrhun in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-23-2007, 01:25 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 10:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing