British Current P4P

[Rantcatrat]

Here is the Sportinglife.com's current British p4p.

I'm surprised Carl Froch is not number 1. I'd probably have Carl Froch, Amir Khan, and then David Haye. What say you?

[Kev]

Well I agree Froch's resume is better, but realistically when you are a world heavyweight champ you will always be British number one I would imagine. We've only have four heavyweight champs in the past 100 or so years.

Haye is number one in an absolute sense, and as heavyweight champ he's the glamour boy of British boxing.

[Fenster]

You meant to say "I'm surprised Carl Froch is NOT number 1"

I agree Froch should be above Haye but Khan is above both P4P. Froch has the best resume. I think Khan would beat FRoch P4P. That's all she wrote.

[Kev]

You meant to say "I'm surprised Carl Froch is NOT number 1"

I agree Froch should be above Haye but Khan is above both P4P. Froch has the best resume. I think Khan would beat FRoch P4P. That's all she wrote.

More of your subjective p4p nonsense. You have to apply the rankings criteria Fenster. It's all about the criteria.

Haye, Froch, Khan is a fair order based on acomplishments, opponent's, weight class, performances etc.

Your opinion that Khan might be Froch in a mythical p4p matchup has no bearing on where they should rank according to the appropriate criteria. That is why you cannot understand p4p.

Also, God is. The Jews rule. Miles is boring.

And that is all.

[erics44]

i think its based on opinion rather than fact

yes perhaps haye would beat froch if they were the same weight

considering record tho froch has to come out on top

[CutMeMick]

Haye was THEE unified Cruiser champ that's Lineal Blood Line that alone holds more merit then anything Khan & Froch have done to date for my likings.

There is NO way DeGale is top 10, sorry but no.

I think the top 3 are easy Haye, Froch, Khan...

I would have Ola Ofalabi & Matthew Macklin somewhere on there.

[ross]

Froch should deffo be 1, even Kahn has fought better opponents.

What has Haye done in the past year? Fought a retired Ruiz and Harrison and where were they on the heavyweight rankings? Id bet neither were in the top ten! Froch has fought Kessler and Abraham in the last year!

If they were both the same size id pick Froch over Haye. Froch has far too much stamina and fight in him. Although im not fond of him, I am starting to respect him as a fighter and he has a hell of a lot more fight in him. I just couldnt see him sagging and looking like a lost little girl only a few rounds in against a retired 40 year old

[Rantcatrat]

Haye was THEE unified Cruiser champ that's Lineal Blood Line that alone holds more merit then anything Khan & Froch have done to date for my likings.

There is NO way DeGale is top 10, sorry but no.

I think the top 3 are easy Haye, Froch, Khan...

I would have Ola Ofalabi & Matthew Macklin somewhere on there.

Problem is that he didn't really beat anyone of note as a cruiserweight.

[Fenster]

You meant to say "I'm surprised Carl Froch is NOT number 1"

I agree Froch should be above Haye but Khan is above both P4P. Froch has the best resume. I think Khan would beat FRoch P4P. That's all she wrote.

More of your subjective p4p nonsense. You have to apply the rankings criteria Fenster. It's all about the criteria.

Haye, Froch, Khan is a fair order based on acomplishments, opponent's, weight class, performances etc.

Your opinion that Khan might be Froch in a mythical p4p matchup has no bearing on where they should rank according to the appropriate criteria.That is why you cannot understand p4p.

Also, God is. The Jews rule. Miles is boring.

And that is all.

Highlighting the obvious flaws/inconsistencies in a particular system/belief doesn't mean one doesn't understand it.

Shall we go through this all over again? ()

Froch and Khan not only have ZERO form that relates them but also it is impossible to compare the strength, abilty and skill level of fighters around 168 to those around 140. You can do no better than take a GUESS

[boxingbantz]

No Ricky Burns in the British p4p list either? I don't rate him that highly myself but, as a world champion, he should be in there.

[Kev]

You meant to say "I'm surprised Carl Froch is NOT number 1"

I agree Froch should be above Haye but Khan is above both P4P. Froch has the best resume. I think Khan would beat FRoch P4P. That's all she wrote.

More of your subjective p4p nonsense. You have to apply the rankings criteria Fenster. It's all about the criteria.

Haye, Froch, Khan is a fair order based on acomplishments, opponent's, weight class, performances etc.

Your opinion that Khan might be Froch in a mythical p4p matchup has no bearing on where they should rank according to the appropriate criteria.That is why you cannot understand p4p.

Also, God is. The Jews rule. Miles is boring.

And that is all.

Highlighting the obvious flaws/inconsistencies in a particular system/belief doesn't mean one doesn't understand it.

Shall we go through this all over again? ()

Froch and Khan not only have ZERO form that relates them but also it is impossible to compare the strength, abilty and skill level of fighters around 168 to those around 140. You can do no better than take a GUESS

I agree completely. Which is why I base my p4p on acomplishments not on a mythical matchup between the pair.

Froch is clearly above Khan p4p based on opposition fought, opposition beat, comparison of losses etc.

Khan may well beat Froch in a mythical matchup, but to me that is neither here nor there, Froch must be above Khan because he has fought better fighters, beaten better fighters, and not lost to as mediocre a fighter, or been knocked out.

You disagree with this?

Also, dinosaurs and man did coexist. And Miles is still dull.

For now, that is all.