Calzaghe v Tarver - Who would have won.?

[smashup]

Calzaghe Blasts Tarver: I Would Have Kicked Your Ass! - Boxing News

[erics44]

My money would have been on calzaghi

one route to look at is calzaghi convincing beat hopkins and hopkins convincingly beat tarver

Calzaghi was extremely fit, threw too many punches for tarver and in his prime had a solid chin

[ross]

My money would have been on calzaghi

one route to look at is calzaghi convincing beat hopkins and hopkins convincingly beat tarver

Calzaghi was extremely fit, threw too many punches for tarver and in his prime had a solid chin

Also, with Tarver being a fellow southpaw would Calzaghe have had an even easier time with him?

[skel1983]

My money would have been on calzaghi

one route to look at is calzaghi convincing beat hopkins and hopkins convincingly beat tarver

Calzaghi was extremely fit, threw too many punches for tarver and in his prime had a solid chin

First off Calzaghe didnt convincingly beat Hopkins it was a close shit fight, secondly that route of fighter a beating fighter b so he would be fighter c is flawed and quite silly really.

For my money prime for prime Calzaghe split decision.

[BIG H]

Yeh - close decison win for JC for me

[erics44]

My money would have been on calzaghi

one route to look at is calzaghi convincing beat hopkins and hopkins convincingly beat tarver

Calzaghi was extremely fit, threw too many punches for tarver and in his prime had a solid chin

First off Calzaghe didnt convincingly beat Hopkins it was a close shit fight, secondly that route of fighter a beating fighter b so he would be fighter c is flawed and quite silly really.

For my money prime for prime Calzaghe split decision.

yep you are right about the fighter a beat fighter b shit being flawed, its not silly tho you can tell a lot from it in most cases

In my opinion Calzaghi did convincinly beat hopikins, after 4 rounds hopkins wasnt in the fight

but thats another debate

[BIG H]

My money would have been on calzaghi

one route to look at is calzaghi convincing beat hopkins and hopkins convincingly beat tarver

Calzaghi was extremely fit, threw too many punches for tarver and in his prime had a solid chin

First off Calzaghe didnt convincingly beat Hopkins it was a close shit fight, secondly that route of fighter a beating fighter b so he would be fighter c is flawed and quite silly really.

For my money prime for prime Calzaghe split decision.

yep you are right about the fighter a beat fighter b shit being flawed, its not silly tho you can tell a lot from it in most cases

In my opinion Calzaghi did convincinly beat hopikins, after 4 rounds hopkins wasnt in the fight

but thats another debate

I agree with that, BUT, he was 5 points ahead after 4 round imo, so it was still close (on the cards)

[erics44]

My money would have been on calzaghi

one route to look at is calzaghi convincing beat hopkins and hopkins convincingly beat tarver

Calzaghi was extremely fit, threw too many punches for tarver and in his prime had a solid chin

First off Calzaghe didnt convincingly beat Hopkins it was a close shit fight, secondly that route of fighter a beating fighter b so he would be fighter c is flawed and quite silly really.

For my money prime for prime Calzaghe split decision.

yep you are right about the fighter a beat fighter b shit being flawed, its not silly tho you can tell a lot from it in most cases

In my opinion Calzaghi did convincinly beat hopikins, after 4 rounds hopkins wasnt in the fight

but thats another debate

I agree with that, BUT, he was 5 points ahead after 4 round imo, so it was still close (on the cards)

yep agreed, it was 8-5

[Fenster]

What a bullshit headline. They've stole those quotes straight from twitter. Tarver was calling him out. Calzaghe laughed it off as all good banter.