The WBO review cards by 5 Int judges are in.

[IamInuit]

[Abelardus]

I guess that about explains it

[shza]

Very interesting to see the round-by-round.

Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.

[jon09]

And they mean what to this? The decision stands and it will stay that way. I do hear John McCain is working on something to clean up the sport and decisions like this in the future. But I have heard and read stuff like this before.

[J_C]

Very interesting to see the round-by-round.

Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.

I agree with this.

Although it shows Pac was certainly unlucky not to get the nod, it doesnt show that Pac won wide and shit like a lot say. 5 pro judges managed to score 7 seperate rounds for Bradley. Therefore, not a robbery.

[IamInuit]

Gentleman 1 judge had it 7-5

The others were

8-4
9-3
10-2
9-3

[Violent Demise]

I think this vid pretty much explains it all

[fan johnny]

It still doesn't change anything expect that Bradley can now be stripped of the belt.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Very interesting to see the round-by-round.

Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.

I agree with this.

Although it shows Pac was certainly unlucky not to get the nod, it doesnt show that Pac won wide and shit like a lot say. 5 pro judges managed to score 7 seperate rounds for Bradley. Therefore, not a robbery.

This is the same argument presented by miron_lang with regards to the Pacquiao-Marquez III fight. But instead of the 5 international judges, he used the round by round scoring of a number of Pachaters who insisted that the fight is a robbery.

Just out of curiosity, what is the take of the you two with regards to that Pacquiao-Marquez III fight?

[shza]

Very interesting to see the round-by-round.

Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.

I agree with this.

Although it shows Pac was certainly unlucky not to get the nod, it doesnt show that Pac won wide and shit like a lot say. 5 pro judges managed to score 7 seperate rounds for Bradley. Therefore, not a robbery.

This is the same argument presented by miron_lang with regards to the Pacquiao-Marquez III fight. But instead of the 5 international judges, he used the round by round scoring of a number of Pachaters who insisted that the fight is a robbery.

Just out of curiosity, what is the take of the you two with regards to that Pacquiao-Marquez III fight?

I scored Pac-Marquez III 115-113 for Pac. I posted my RBR at the time, noting rounds that I could see going either way. i said at the time that you could legitimately score that fight as wide as 116-112 either way -- therefore not a robbery. Even less so than this one.

So I am being consistent here.

[Enthusiast]

7-5? I thought it's Pacquiao winning 9 rounds in the WBO review?

Very interesting to see the round-by-round.

Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.

[shza]

7-5? I thought it's Pacquiao winning 9 rounds in the WBO review?

Very interesting to see the round-by-round.

Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.

re-read my post

[IamInuit]

43 rds to 18 on 5 judges score cards.

That’s pretty much a shit kicking.

Any questions?

[GOAT]

I guess that about explains it

So true. That explains that IamInuit is able to use Microsoft Excel.

[Dropanuke]

Imagine what Tim would do with a healthy foot!!!!!