Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: What would change about boxing?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    780
    Cool Clicks

    Default What would change about boxing?

    The one thing you think would do the most good for boxing and the fans. How would you go about making that change?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    The very foundation of judge’s from how they are picked or chosen to where they sit. Promoters should not even know who the judges are let alone be a factor along with broadcasters and sanctioning bodies in who fills the seat.

    You?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    In an ideal world we would have one "world wide" governing body. How would we get there? God knows!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    In an ideal world we would have one "world wide" governing body. How would we get there? God knows!
    Yup that's another must that just wont happen. For instance the Wbc has already told Garcia that he must give up one belt or the other. I don't even think I will ever see true unification again in my lifetime.

    I'd also bring back 15 rounds for title fights.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Yeah, the one or maximum, two organisations would be my change. Two only because it's always awesome to see a unification bout. Best vs Best.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    808
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    In an ideal world we would have one "world wide" governing body. How would we get there? God knows!
    Yup that's another must that just wont happen. For instance the Wbc has already told Garcia that he must give up one belt or the other. I don't even think I will ever see true unification again in my lifetime.

    I'd also bring back 15 rounds for title fights.

    Is that right? Fucking disgusting behaviour if they have said that.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by armyash View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    In an ideal world we would have one "world wide" governing body. How would we get there? God knows!
    Yup that's another must that just wont happen. For instance the Wbc has already told Garcia that he must give up one belt or the other. I don't even think I will ever see true unification again in my lifetime.

    I'd also bring back 15 rounds for title fights.

    Is that right? Fucking disgusting behaviour if they have said that.
    I'm afraid so:


    by David P. Greisman

    The winner of this Saturday’s junior-welterweight unification bout between Amir Khan and Danny Garcia will have to vacate one of his two world titles, according to World Boxing Council President José Sulaimán.

    Khan-Garcia will be for the WBC and WBA belts, though the unification won’t last for long.

    That’s because the World Boxing Council hasn’t recently allowed for its world title to remain unified with other sanctioning body belts, though.

    Just last month, 105-pound titleholder Kazuto Ioka defeated Akira Yaegashi, adding Yaegashi’s WBA title to his own WBC belt. Ioka and Yaegashi had been told beforehand that the winner would need to relinquish one of the titles. Ioka opted to keep the WBA belt and ditch the WBC.

    And in another noteworthy instance three years ago, Timothy Bradley was told he’d have to pick between his WBC title and the WBO belt he’d just won from Kendall Holt. Bradley held onto the WBO belt and vacated the WBC.

    The aforementioned bouts came with the WBC’s blessing in advance. The news of another belt other than their own being at stake for this weekend’s HBO headliner in Las Vegas was, well, news to the WBC’s leadership.

    “It is a real surprise to know … that the WBA title is involved,” Sulaimán told BoxingScene.com via email Thursday night. “The WBC will accept only the WBC. Whoever doesn’t want it, the title is vacant.”

    Garcia is the WBC’s titleholder, having won that vacant belt in March by defeating Erik Morales. The fight between Khan and Garcia has been marketed as being solely for the WBC belt.

    Earlier this week, however, the World Boxing Association made official what had previously been rumored — the WBA returned its junior welterweight title to Khan, who had lost that belt against Lamont Peterson in December. Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone ahead of a since-canceled May rematch with Khan.

    Peterson’s team admitted to using the substance for what it said was medical purposes ahead of the first Khan clash, which apparently was enough reason for the WBA to take the title from Peterson and give it back to Khan. The WBA also lists Marcos Maidana as its “regular” 140-pound titleholder.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    780
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    The very foundation of judge’s from how they are picked or chosen to where they sit. Promoters should not even know who the judges are let alone be a factor along with broadcasters and sanctioning bodies in who fills the seat.

    You?
    The first idea is the best idea this time. Disconnect the judges from the promoters, fighters, sanctioning bodies and any other person with an interest (monetary) in the fight. Give them their own room with the same feed the fans get, maybe the detachment will deep their emotions in check. There is a lot happening around the ring during a fight and I can understand a judge being distracted. Choose the judges from a pool. Some type of tiered pool with the most experienced judges in the top tier. There is no way you would want them to hear the announcers because they always put their own slant on the fight. Any ideas? Come on all y'all, the man has an outstanding idea here, let's help him out!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1864
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Change would be good in boxing, a lot of stuff that has happened in recent years is getting comical. It could only get worse as well. But what could actually be done though? The way boxing is and how established the sport is through all of these sanctioning bodies is just makes it hard to see how they could be broken down. They are blatantly corrupt and money making schemes but it just gets put under the table. I like the idea of the judges not knowing the promotor, but can you see that ever happening?

    It's horrible really, but a radical change in the sport would give it positive image, with all of the corruption and PEDS incidents or late you hope change is on the horizon. But nothing as usual has happened of it.

    I would personally be behind cleaning up the sport, as a young boxing fan I feel I understand change would be good and I would love for that to happen. But in a realistic world, there's too much money involved that's why I don't think anything radical would happen. However, it really does need to though.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,164
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1870
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    i) one governing body - will never happen. That body should have the authority to force match ups, control promoters, tv rights etc.. Yep I am in fucking dream world !

    ii) Judges current scores announced every three rounds - will never happen


    Make as many fights available to general public as possible and not all these fucking ppv, standalone subscription channels etc...

    Even fight fans are not seeing some of the main fighters these days without forking out - so if it continues the casual fan may all but disappear.
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Naked or at least topless round card girls would be good.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,777
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2026
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Naked or at least topless round card girls would be good.


    You got my vote for commissioner.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would change about boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Naked or at least topless round card girls would be good.


    You got my vote for commissioner.

    See how easily people are swayed by politicians.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Big Change in boxing coming??
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-21-2012, 04:13 PM
  2. change your name? HELP
    By jabvargas24 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 09:15 PM
  3. If u could change one thing in boxing!
    By Drago in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-18-2010, 06:59 PM
  4. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 11-01-2007, 01:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing