Open scoring, are you for or against?

[beenKOed]

I want open scoring, but after 4 and 8 is BS.
Scoring after each round is best.
After 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 is good too.

What do you think?
Hate it?
Like it?
Don't care?
Don't think it adds anything to boxing?
Want to give it a try?

[armin]

I want open scoring, but after 4 and 8 is BS.
Scoring after each round is best.
After 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 is good too.

What do you think?
Hate it?
Like it?
Don't care?
Don't think it adds anything to boxing?
Want to give it a try?

Horrible idea can affect the fight to much, also instead of being pissed of with a shit decision just at the end you would be pissed off with the scores the entire fight if its shitty/corrupt judges.

[erics44]

i think open scoring is a rubbish idea too

its like knowing what the sex of your baby is before its born

[Beanflicker]

As a fan I don't like it, because it takes away the suspense of the decision at the end. Much more anticlimactic.

For the boxer I think it's a good idea though. I kinda think the boxer deserves to know where he stands in the fight so he can adjust his tactics accordingly.

[bigstinkybug]

there's no incentive to getting a ko... why risk it? even with open scoring, if ther was an incentive, like say"bonus money"... then...

[TitoFan]

I'm against it. Fight the whole fight. If you've dominated, you'll know... at least you should know. Then fight accordingly in the last rounds. But no slam-shut scoring where the guys knows he's lost the fight already in the 8th round.